How come we can't just create a file from a torrent hash

>>60046070
Sounds like a good idea. I'm not OP BTW.

>>60046070
because, the human eye can't see more than 1 md5 cycle per year

>>60046070
How is it better than compression when the file size of the hash is bigger than the data itself?

>>60046336
Uh sweetie you mustn't have torrented anything before. The hash file is far smaller than the actual file.

>>60046336
You clearly know nothing about computers.

>>60046376
>>60046397
>2 minutes delay
Kill yourself samefag

Youre even worse than the "EGGSECUTIVE LOONIX" poster

>>60046070
Yes something like this would be awesome and is totally within the realm of possibility.

The problem with using bittorrent for this is that you need to have a tracker.

bittorrent sync (which has since been renamed) is great for this but only on machines you control

if you want to have a globally accessible, decentralized, fully encrypted and secure universal filesystem share look into ipfs: https://ipfs.io

don't get your hopes up though it's still got a LONG ways to go and might end up being just a pump+dump sv startup meme

as long as capitalism exists file sharing will not be easy

>>60046070
Because a hash has a many files to one hash relation. Now, What would be nice to have is enough redundancy in the downloaded torrent such that we could repair partially downloaded files.