Are printers still the most vulnerable system in a network

No because thanks to IoT people will soon have hundreds of connected devices that never receive firmware updates.

>>60018276
We should ask Brickerbot.

>>60018493
Here is a link to make it easy for you people.

https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/alerts/ICS-ALERT-17-102-01A

I actually have an unsecured IoT device in my house so I can use an alibi when I get caught port scanning/hacking/cracking - I just tell the police someone did it remotely.

>>60018617
implying its illegal to scan ports

>>60018617
What can someone do by finding an open port for an IoT device (like a garage door or thermostat)? Can they really get into your server/pc this way?

>>60018617
great job posting it here anon

>>60018428
>"SMART DEVICE"
>EVEN FASTER KEKING

>>60018276
Still? Most places still use 20 year old printers, so yes.

>>60019598
>implying someone hacking into his network didn't post that to try and ruin his alibi

I'm on to your games, hackerman

File: 1490210460560.gif (2MB, 695x392px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 695x392px

>tfw printing pictures of your waifu all over campus

yes

File: 1442957073144.jpg (158KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 720x480px

>>60018428
> we're connecting every piece of machinery and control systems directly to the internet
> what could go wrong?