https://benchlife.info/intel-x299-w ill-announce-by-navin-in-computex-2

>>59997928
>15% faster!

>iGPU that is. Ecks Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

File: hamer.jpg (52KB, 957x621px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 957x621px

>>59997928
>Ryzen9 is gonna have 16Cores on X390

Not this time

>Intel can casually reschedule a chipset/cpu-launch to six months earlier
wtf

>>59998425
They have the blueprints of their products scheduled to be launched years ahead. Did you think that they would dispose all of their resources to launch the most innovative product?

>>59997928
It will still cost $330-1,050+ for all the good goys out there.

they'll really have to find a way to justify the system either with 7700k-tier performance just with more cores or actually (gasp) bring prices down, otherwise most people will just continue buying 1700X's.

>>59998737
It seems so far their response has been to do nothing and hope nobody buys Ryzen on the backs of retarded shills and gaymurr benchmarks showing delidded, watercooled 5GHz i7-7700K's.