Firefox 53 released

There are people that don't use ESR?

>>59959071
I came here to post that

>>59959081
>>59959071
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/52.1.0esr/

>>59959071
What's the point? It's going to merge anyway sooner or later

>>59959114
it means you have to go through about:config and disable all of mozilla's stupid bullshit once a year instead of once every six weeks.

>>59959132
What did you have to disable recently?

>Still using Firefox
>2017

>>59959155
Nothing, since I use ESR. (Actually, Debian is still on 45.8) I also didn't have to investigate any broken addons. It's nice.

>>59959189
Neither did I, that's why I asked you. Well whatever

Alright, let's get this over with.

>New themes, a few gimmicks
Don't use, don't care.

>New permission control center
Chrome has had this for a long time.

>Windows 7+ users on 64-bit OS can select 32-bit or 64-bit versions in the stub installer
Why would you even want this? Sounds like a gimmick.

>Shortened titles on tabs are faded out instead of using ellipsis for improved readability
Just like in Chrome.

>Media playback on new tabs is blocked until the tab is visible
I think Chrome does this as well, although I'm not quite sure. Anyway, good.

>Support for WebM video with alpha, which allows playing videos with transparent backgrounds
Nice, didn't know WebM supported this.

Overall, a lot of gimmick, niche features, no real reason to update except if you actually use them. This is exactly why browsers like Chrome dominate the market: Chrome is just a browser, staying secure and supporting new features instead of adding gimmicks and autism.

>>59959240
but anon, it does support new features

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/53

>>59959071
I haven't checked the updates in ages. What's the difference between ESR and the normal release?
Still running FF 46 here.

>>59959240
Problem being that Chrome tattles to Google and there's nothing you can do to stop it. It also looks like Chrome and there's nothing you can do to change that.

Firefox is pretty shit these days but at least you can dig around in about:config and turn off the botnet and bullshit.
https://github.com/ghacksuserjs/ghacks-user.js

>Two new 'compact' themes available in Firefox, dark and light, based on the Firefox Developer Edition theme
I remember in 2013 when the Australis UI change was in progress and I was using firefox
I used to edit my XUL to get a dark compact theme and they broke that
They broke XUL and it took them 4 fucking years to achieve something we used to achieve by playing with XUL or downloading a XUL from github

I'm glad they finally did it but the whole thing is deplorable

Does anyone know if Firefox 53 adds back the ability to listen to youtube videos in the background? I had to switch to using newpipe to actually listen to music on youtube while my screen is turned off

>>59959045
I've had it for ages

t. nightly user since 2012

>>59959318
>user_pref("ghacks_user.js.parrot", "1200 syntax error: the parrot's a stiff!");

um, weird. I've been using a slightly modified version of this tho
https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.js

>>59959189
>Debian is still on 45.8
Lincuck repositories, everyone :)

>>59959205
Don't bother with retard like that, muh mozilla fuckery is more of a placebo than anything else.

>>59959398
yep, 45.8.0esr released 6th of March

it should update to 45.9.0esr soon

>>59959394
there's one of those in each section. The idea is if there's a syntax error in user.js, the browser just throws up its hands and stops parsing it. So having that pref in there lets you look at that setting in about:config, and if there was an error it'll tell you what section the error was in.

>>59959045
does it come with a forced subscription to lbgtqwtfbbq tumblr profiles finally?
Or is it still not diverse enough?

>>59959240
>Overall, a lot of gimmick, niche features, no real reason to update except if you actually use them. This is exactly why browsers like Chrome dominate the market: Chrome is just a browser, staying secure and supporting new features instead of adding gimmicks and autism.

And mining your data like no tomorrow.

>>59959444
I see, interesting.

why would there be any syntax erorrs in it though?

when is the photon update coming?

is this the update that kills most addons

>supporting globalism

>>59959611
I thought it was 56 or 57?

That stopping media playback was long overdue.

>>59959609
probably never.

>>59959297
ESR lets you stay on an older release but keep on receiving security updates. It's ideal if you don't want to upgrade.

When is nightly 56 coming out?
Can't find any 56 builds yet.

>>59959621
Better gay than jew.
t. cute programmer.

>>59959071
Great option. Just lose to Icecat.

File: ra.jpg (97KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1280x720px

>>59959899
this might interest you
http://release.mozilla.org/firefox/release/2017/04/17/Dawn-Project-FAQ.html

>On April 18th, Firefox 55 will remain on Nightly. This means Firefox 55 will remain on Nightly for two full cycles.

out of curiosity, by using nightly do you report bugs as well?

>>59959957
Thank you for the link. I wasn't aware they were phasing out dev edition.

>do you report bugs as well?
No. I just use ff nightly because it's faster than the other release channels, and isn't actually unstable either.

>>59959957
>report bugs
I used to, but my daily drive OS got the shaft from Mozilla, so I won't be doing that no more.

>>59959351
it worked when i tried last week

>>59960089
what os are you using anon?

>>59959558
Because you're meant to look through all the stuff in that file and change any options you don't want. Some of the settings will break some sites.

One example. It looks like they changed this now, but the version I got a month or two ago had tls.version.min set to block TLS 1.0. (SSL3 is already blocked, I believe) Turns out I visited two sites regularly that wouldn't negotiate anything higher than that. One is since fixed, the other isn't.

>>59960390
templeOS

>>59959071
This is the final update for ESR 45

>>59959045
4 versions till XUL is gone

>>59962670
Good thing 52 ESR lasts till next year.

>>59959351
there's an about:config setting that fixes it.

no longer supports java

>>59963519
Is that a bad thing? Use ESR if you must.

>Windows XP and Vista are no longer supported. XP and Vista users running Firefox 52 will continue to receive security updates on Firefox ESR 52.

I guess by 57 they'll drop win7 and 8 as well, so the loss of XUL will be totally irrelevant.

>>59963590
They dropped them because they're not supported by microsoft, so no need to care about them.

Desktop version of ff has been shit for years it's good on Android tho

>>59959318

how the fuck do you load that the ghacks-use.js up? i've been looking for 10 minutes on how to install them

also, why not just use Pale Moon or Waterfox

>>59963519
WTF? I love FF now.

>>59963670
Just drop it into the root directory of your profile.

>>59963707

there is prefs.js in there

>>59963731
Yep, that's the right directory to put user.js in then.

>>59963731
User.js will write and override settings for prefs.js. It would be wise to backup that file.

ok, so what version of ESR do I download, 45 or 52?

>>59959045
>Not compiling Inox
What the fuck anon.

>>59959045

Oh god my dick is hard now, thanks anon.

Is this still made in China or did they bring it back to the US?

We have work computers still sitting on some old as fuck version cause we're not allowed to update.

>using firefox instead of waterfox
>using firefox instead of brave
kill yourself

Notify me when this thing is as stable as chrome and doesn't crash whenever it wants.

>>59965175
Consider yourself notified.

>>59959132
>it means you have to go through about:config and disable all of mozilla's stupid bullshit once a year instead of once every six weeks.
Which will be irrelevant for all branches of Firefox next year once WebExtensions is the only extension API on all branches.

>>59965329
Unless they plan to stop fucking with the UI, and adding anti-features like telemetry, pocket, safebrowsing, and so on, then no, there'll still be things you need to disable every version.

Even if you leave all that aside they're enthusiastic about implementing the latest features, lots of which are high-entropy fingerprinting vectors (canvas, webrtc, beacon...), those will need to be turned off.

>>59959045
>The last few characters of shortened tab titles fade out instead of being replaced by ellipses to keep more of the title visible
Good. That has been something that has been bothering me.
With all of my 4chan threads in their own tabs, I only see "(1) /g/ - thre...", which often isn't enough to identify the thread properly.

>>59963590
Someone (probably an MSFN user) will have a kernel level compatibility pack out for XP within the next year or so.

>>59959158
Literally no good alternative

>>59965374
>Unless they plan to stop fucking with the UI, and adding anti-features like telemetry, pocket, safebrowsing, and so on, then no, there'll still be things you need to disable every version.
You don't seem to understand the implications of WebExtensions being the only extension API.

How's the memory usage?

>>59966040
How does that affect anything I mentioned?

>>59966058
You won't be able to turn any of it off.

>>59966068
All of that stuff gets turned off through about:config. Not through addons.

>>59959240
>Chrome is just a browser, staying secure and supporting new features instead of adding gimmicks and autism.

It's got even more gimmicks and autism than Firefox. Enjoy your google tracking design.

File: 1491302410949.jpg (32KB, 189x189px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 189x189px

>>59959351
The fuck, you can't listen to YT videos in the background anymore?
Now I'm really glad I haven't updated FF in ages.

>>59963649
It's actually the opposite.

>>59964682
>using meme browsers

faggot

How many weeks until addons are fucked?

>>59966352
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/SDK/Guides/XUL_Migration_Guide

>From Firefox 57 onwards, WebExtensions will be the only supported extension type, and Firefox will not load other types.

Firefox 57 release date being 2017-08-07, I'd say about ~3.5months (15-ish weeks)

>>59966440
then will firefox finally be dead? or will there still be shills defending it

Fucking piece of shit detected that I was on an outdated version and 'updated' back to the 42 official build. Fuck cuckzilla. Made me disable the Ethernet to turn off the automatic update.

>>59966936
nah

>>59959045
atleast it's not shooting to 50% CPU with 1.5GB RAM with one empty tab open for an hour or until I close it.

>>59967248
This never happens to me. I have only seen high CPU if I go to a site with a ton of video embeds and it doesn't go over 50%

>>59959240
Firefox today:
>We'll build a browse just as good as chrome is right now.
Meanwhile chrome gets better and firefox is always behind.

>>59967277
Used to happen in the 40 something versions

>>59967296
Still didn't see it then. I use Firefox pretty normally, though. I only open like 15 tabs max with 8 extensions loaded and close the browser completely when I'm done.

>arch still on 52.0
>muh bleeding edge

so will servo be worth all the pain lads?

>>59967353
by the time servo lands, it'll be obsolete

>>59967404
don't, i can't take that now.

>>59967353
this>>59967404
And when servo lands you won't be able to use most addons.

how long before firefox is too sexist and they rebrand to firevulpine

>>59965378
Does anyone mind posting an screenshoot of how this looks? Can't have access to desktop atm

>>59959132
Mozilla keeps your about:config entries between updates. Wtf are you on about

>>59967486
Did you just assumed Fox gender?

>>59959045

> Ended Firefox Linux support for processors older than Pentium 4 and AMD Opteron


REEEEEEEEE

>>59967863
how this is a bad thing?

>>59965750
Seems like it would be easier to compile firefox for windows XP than to make a new kernel for firefox

>>59967863
>being poor

kek

File: XhZaYo8[1].png (63KB, 1304x768px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1304x768px

>>59967510
Pic related.

I run stock iceweasel 31 that came with debian, any reason to update?

>>59967935
I unironically love the screenshot meme.

File: Untitled.png (76KB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1920x1040px

Here's with the "Compact" them that they're building. There're dark and light modes to.

>>59968028
Yeah they ported the developer edition themes to the new theme APIs. It looks like Mozilla is actually going to incorporate parts of the compact themes into their next design of firefox. The upcoming "photon" theme has a compact mode that reduces padding on elements and makes the back/forward arrows in the toolbar the same height like the small icons mode in firefox <=28

File: 4Req605.png (158KB, 2732x1536px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 2732x1536px

>>59968090
https://www.ghacks.net/2017/03/31/firefox-photon-new-design-mockups-show-interface-and-more/

Yup. It's pretty ok looking. Their animation demos look pretty good. In particular, the new context/drop down menus look amazing.

>>59959297
>46
I'm on 37

>>59968129
ALL THAT FUCKING WASTED SPACE!!! WHY CAN THEY NOT JUST MAKE THIS SHIT MORE COMPACT????

fucking wasted browsing space.

>>59959297
ESR gets one major update a year. Between the major updates it gets smaller security updates.

File: Untitled.png (43KB, 1643x160px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1643x160px

>>59968901
It's in touch mode. They've implemented touch controls, mouse controls and a minimal mode which makes it even smaller.

Picture related.

>>59968923
ah

>>59968129
Wow, they stole the dinosaur. Is there a single solitary thing that Mozilla *hasn't* ripped off from Chrome yet? Besides a relatively stable browser, of course.

>>59963890
Just download 52. ESR 45 is on its final update and support is terminated this june. Has mozilla merged beta with aurora yet?

>all these anti Mozilla shills

You know if Firefox keeps losing people we will have no blink/WebKit alternative, right?

>>59967530
he means for each new 'feature' they add

>>59968997
Palemoon is going to overtake firefox eventually.

>>59969044
Not likely.

>>59968968
Beta and Aurora merge together in 54 so within the next week or so.

>>59968997
>everyone who wants to use their browser for 5 minutes without crashing is a shill

fuck me, this version actually runs smoother on my rig + the new compact theme is pretty spiffy.

>>59969044
Ok furfag.

>>59969435
webm?

>>59969473
Despite being made by a furry, it's more stable, caters to power users better, and is less degenerate than SJWfox currently is.

>>59968997
>WebKit
What's the appeal of this?

>>59969590
What's the differences between all FF clones?

>>59959611
Most addons are extensions. The only thing Firefox is gonna kill is plugins which most probably you're not even using.

>>59969823
It's so shit it doesn't even support all extensions.

>>59969823
Icon

>>59969532
https://mega.nz/fm/Byp3Sa7Y
i'm too lazy to resize it...

>>59969590
>SJWfox SJWzilla cuckcuckcuck XDD
Kill yourself.

https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/04/05/faq-on-ceo-resignation/

>>59969966
>mega
At least upload it to mixtape

>>59969966
Learn how to MEGA, nigger.

>>59959045
who is using this in 2017?

>>59969996
>>59970009
>my.mixtape.moe/lfqtso.webm
your gratefulness makes it all worth it. be happy i'm bored enough to bother with this shit

>Ended Firefox Linux support for processors older than Pentium 4 and AMD Opteron
FUCK
Guess I'll compile my own Pale Moon releases from now on.

>>59963519
PICKED UP

>>59959351
>Does anyone know if Firefox 53 adds back the ability to listen to youtube videos in the background?

Why would you need this when Newpipe exists?

Firefox sucks on Android. Just use Lightning Browser and Newpipe. There's 2 ways of playing audio with the screen off using that.

>>59969990
That's just damage control

Did anything actually change? Web components? Service Workers? HTMLDialogElement? Any feature worth mentioning?

>>59970440
>"they are pandering to SJWs, therefore they are SJWs"
>except they have this lengthy blog post stating that they don't give a duck about their contributor's beliefs, they wanted Eich to stay, they have no official stance on gay marriage and deny every connection to the cause
>if they were really SJW, or pandering to them, they would never say any of that since a. It's a suicide with that demographic and b. A SJW doesn't care about /pol/ enough to pander to them
>"t-t-that's damage control"
Your post is damage control. All that "SJWzilla Firecuck is shit for cucks kek" is nothing but shitposting.

You're damaging the FOSS community with your shitty FUD. Get a fucking life or shut the fuck up.

Is this the version that's killing addons?

>>59970765
no

>>59970765
Yes

>>59959351
Nope.
>>59970243
Can I use uBlock, Descentaleyes and Random Agent Spoofer with Lightning Browser? No? Then I'll keep using Firefox.

Furthermore, using an open source browser in Android is useless if you're still using Google's WebView. You're still being tracked by their telemetry unless you use AOSP's WebView, but no phone comes with it.

>>59970765
You can't upload new legacy addons to the store anymore, so it's the start.

>>59959240

2/10

(((You))) made me respond.

>>59970809
>Furthermore, using an open source browser in Android is useless if you're still using Google's WebView. You're still being tracked by their telemetry

[citation needed]

I'm not signed in. So no.

Why would they remove background audio?

>>59970843
The Google Jew wills it!

Just use Newpipe. Much better than using a browser and has 2 ways to play audio in the background.

>>59970444
>4502 bugs found.
Yep, some changes. Sheesh anon, check the developer release notes for that stuff.

When are we getting Chrome extension support?

>>59959045
So in short: more bloat and nothing new?

Boy, I'm getting kind of sleepy. Maybe we should all just take a nap.

>>59970765
No version is killing addons. WebExtensions has thousands of developers. Most Firefox' addons have a Chrome version and those that don't are going to be replaced with backed-in features (like TreeStyleTabs), rewritten using the new APIs that Mozilla is developing or just going to be useless anyway since they're changing basically everything in the browser.

The truth is most of the addons don't need the amount of customization XUL gives them.

XUL is also a huge security risk, since they can execute and modify everything Firefox can. So an extension could wipe out your /home/ directory (or root, if you're regarded enough to run a browser as root), download shit, execute other programs, etc. The amount of work Mozilla has to put every time someone wants to upload an add-on to their page is ridiculous. Also, every browser update can break addons.

XUL extensions were a mistake. A expensive one, at that.

>>59970945
But they'rek illing addons.

>>59970945
Yeah but lots of fags are mad that downthemall is pretty much dead after Firefox 57.

haha

>>59970878
I wasn't aware they had a separate changelog for normies.

Thanks anon.

>>59965927
pale moon w greasemonkey and adblock is tight as fuck and doesn't devour as much cpu

>>59959132
>He doesn't use a custom user.js and symlinks it to his profiles
ISHYGDDT

>>59959364
Can't honestly put up with daily updates.

>>59971757
>look at my post with no value
I see you

>Will I still be able to test add-ons with Developer Edition?
>You can continue to test unsigned add-ons on Nightly builds or load WebExtensions temporarily in Beta and Release builds.
>We are also continuing to provide unbranded builds of the beta and release branches which are able to run unsigned add-ons - including bootstrapped - for development and experimentation. These versions will not be verified by QE, but will receive updates , which is an improvement to the unbranded builds we currently provide for add-on development..
>The majority of Developer Edition users won't experience any disruption. However those developers who rely on unsigned add-ons will need to use Nightly builds until we have finalized the unsigned add-on builds specifically for those developers.

Classic Mozilla

>>59966140
Pretty sure he's a phone poster

firefox nightly is better

>>59968964
wew

>>59968964
I hope you're trolling

>>59966049
I currently have ~270 loaded tabs in my session.

>user_pref("dom.ipc.processCount", 100);
>user_pref("dom.ipc.processPrelaunch.enabled", true);
10.3 GB

>user_pref("dom.ipc.processCount", 1);
>user_pref("dom.ipc.processPrelaunch.enabled", true);
5.4 GB

Pick your poison.

>>59968129
cuntfox for todlers

>>59970945
>Most Firefox' addons have a Chrome version and those that don't are going to be replaced with backed-in features (like TreeStyleTabs),
NO NO NO!
Chrome doesn't have the addons I'm using and they're not building in those.

File: 111.png (122KB, 1390x787px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1390x787px

>>59968923
but it's still big as fuck.

>>59972972
fuck you, Hernandez

>>59959045
I like the new dark theme!

>>59972972
for you.

>>59970726
Visit some hacker den someytime and read a thread on firefox.
if it's still in the archive after being locked that is.

Which actually useful addons are really going to be killed?

>>59959045
>Media playback on new tabs is blocked until the tab is visible
Oh man finally

firefox with ublock medium mode is pretty comfy. firefox still sucks on android though. meme forks are a joke.

File: cure.jpg (45KB, 460x842px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 460x842px

>>59972972

is there a better dark skin than FT DeepDark?

>>59974767
Flash? Can't play your childhood flash games anymore once Firefox 58 is released.

>>59976499
Flash isn't going anywhere.

>>59976076
no

>>59959659
Should be 57.

File: shrug.png (20KB, 560x407px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 560x407px

>>59976076
I honestly like the new built in dark theme better. Just switched

What does Firefox have to do to become the #1 browser once again?

How does it defeat the almighty Chrome?

>>59978937
Ive used both. I think FF has better extension support, it's open source and just feels better to me. I also like the layout and aesthetics more.

>>59978995
yeah that's why i use firefox too, last I checked there were some useful add-ons firefox had that chrome doesn't have.

but it seems like firefox will never be on top ever again... well maybe competition is a good thing for everyone.

>>59959045
How do I get Adblock on Firefox on android? I'm using a Verizon ellipsis 8.

>>59979105
? google?

https://adblockplus.org/android-install
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/ublock-origin/

>>59978937
It needs to embrace more diversity and throw that on the main Mozilla page without any mention of the product they should be pushing in the first place, and not mention Firefox in any obvious place on the website, and have absolutely no call-to-action button to download Firefox in plain sight on their website, just like they're doing now.

There's nothing for world domination quite like confusing the fuck out of everybody who visits your page and doesn't know exactly what they're there to download.

The compact dark theme is giving me strong arc-theme vibes

File: firefox_2017-04-20_00-17-18.png (2KB, 109x57px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 109x57px

The gap to the left of the tab is pissing me off.

File: file.png (440KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1920x1080px

>>59968901
>>59968923
>>59972972
>>59980460
>>59959045
>"COMPACT"

LOL

GET ON MY LEVEL YOU FUCKING PLEBS, HOW HARD IS TO DO THIS (pic related) THE FUCKING OFFICIAL THEME?

Does it finally support a single input bar?
Does it use GTK3?

File: 1373016595749.jpg (47KB, 292x227px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 292x227px

How updates until the add-ons become unusable?

>>59959240

>Improved graphics stability for Windows users with the addition of compositor process separation (Quantum Compositor)

This is significant improvement.

>>59972438

Can you open the same tabs in Chrome and post memory usage?

>>59981536
significant improvement my ass. Now I don't have hardware acceleration anymore on Windows 7.

Go to hell Furryshit, I'm going to Opera and Chromium

>>59968129
Will I be able to style this though?

>>59983754
Doesn't have anything to do with hardware acceleration I believe. Your lack of hardware acceleration is probably due to your own stupidity or the driver not being stable

>>59968129
looks like shit

>>59984109
it's because of this shit that it requires now:
>Platform Update for Windows 7
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/jj863687(v=vs.85).aspx

...which is not fully supported on Windows 7

>>59984811
Seems to work for me.

>>59980460
>tabs on bottom
oh wow.

>>59981573
With both browsers using default settings except for the two below for firefox, and using ublock origin with both at default settings, opening the same 120 tabs on both resulted in 4.8GB for chrome and 6.5GB for firefox.

>user_pref("dom.ipc.processCount", 100);
>user_pref("dom.ipc.processPrelaunch.enabled", true);

>>59985005
lucky you

>Media playback on new tabs is blocked until the tab is visible

This is the best change of all but it is not turned on by default, you have to make a change in about:config

media.block-autoplay-until-in-foreground

set it to True

File: IMG_1034.jpg (17KB, 172x225px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 172x225px

I've been using waterfox since /g/ told me to about 6 months ago.

Have I been cucked?

File: 20170420_002.png (588B, 325x31px) Image search: [Google]

588B, 325x31px

>>59985697
Nightly user here

>>59959045
Update disabled every single one of my plugins and having to go through each to "reenable" them with big popups over multiple tabs.

>>59959071
>ESR latest version X
>Your browser is outdated and is not supported anymore, update to version X+1 to continue browsing the site or fuck off
every time

>Two new 'compact' themes available in Firefox
>still less screen estate than google-chrome
what are they doing?

>>59985766
Waterfox consistently crashed on me no matter what I did. I've been using pale meme until a few months ago when it lost support for tree tabs. Now I just use Firefox and mitigate it's horrible bloat ( seriously more than 4 open tabs and it dies, and I am not on a toaster) with auto suspend tab addons.

What does /g/ think of Sleipnir btw? I know it's a chromium-like but I don't see anyone talking about it

The compact themes don't fit with windows 7's aesthetic. I don't get why they're so popular anyway they don't even look good.

File: 1492700420279.png (292KB, 2023x1291px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 2023x1291px

>>59986997
I think it looks great on Windows 7

>>59987199
The rounded edges on the windows and the transparency don't fit it imo. I also don't like that the new tab button is like its own tab rather than fading into the background. I wish Mozilla would revert firefox back to the 28 theme on windows 7 at least

>>59987265
You're not forced to use the new theme, you dimwit.

File: ms-office-dark-theme.png (120KB, 1279x759px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1279x759px

>>59987265
Eh, I personally like it. Been using it since it was released under the name "developer theme sark". Ideally would be FireFox's current theme but with dark fog and toolbar instaed of blue Like Office 2010.

Is using Nightly as your main browser worth it?

>>59987745
Imo, no. Use stable. Nightly recently broke uB0 (it works now), and I've encountered different UI glitches thoughout the time.

>>59987745
>>59987841
I've used nightly as my main browser for years now, uB0 breaking was about the worst thing that happened in the past year and that was fixed very quickly.

If you want some features that nightly offers right now and not in the future then go for it, it's completely fine in terms of stability.

is there an extension to show SSL cert details in the address bar? I'd like to see the common name part of the cert without having to click through three windows

>>59986897
Happens with like 1/100 sites, who fucking cares kid

>>59986897
Modify user agent string

>>59960390
Prob WinXP or Vista.

>>59987745
I recommend Beta. You can expect features to remain in place for 6-8 weeks pretty much, there's basically no sudden breakages. It's not too far behind Nightly if you're interested in new features.

>>59988066
>>59988145
Well they aren't doing this for fun, sometimes site gets really broken if your browser doesn't support some useless gimmick they happened to take a liking to.
Last time I fell for ESR meme it was 4chan-x. When moot broke the site once again the updated version required 26 no less for some reason, with 24 being the latest ESR.

>t. still on 28

>>59968923
How do I enable compact mode for compact theme then? Not very intuitive...

I'm on 53 and i cant download anything
anyone else have this problem?

>>59963611
without further support != is now incompatible
firefox now REQUIRES dot net to work on windows

>>59959240
>Chrome is just a browser, staying secure and supporting new features instead of adding gimmicks and autism.


Ha ha, no. It does, however, score highest on HTML5 compatibility. Mozilla need to pick up the pace as Edge is only one point behind Firefox these days.

I'm happy they are killing the old addons. Your web browser shouldn't be build on stupid gimmicks. Tree style tabs are for rural retards and the other shit is useless. The only thing I am sad about is classic theme restorer. I might transfer to edge soon anyways because I like it's integration with one note. You can highlight stuff. I don't use chrome cause the search function is annoying. Like you search facebook and it says press tab to use facebook search.

>>59990464
Eat shit and die

>>59959240
you missed the overhauled compositor, Schlomo
>mfw little ol Mozilla still holds its own against a multi billion dollar company
Literally NO excuses :)

>>59959045
>53
but I'm already using 55?

File: waterfox_2017-03-12_22-51-07.png (104KB, 1920x216px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1920x216px

>>59980953
Not all of us are retarded. Love Waterfox so comfy to style

>>59964682
memeeeee

File: 1413149927233-0.jpg (11KB, 202x255px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 202x255px

>>59965329
>once WebExtensions is the only extension API on all branches.

So there is literally no reason to use Firefox over Chromium now. Good to know.

>>59968129
/g/ is getting butthurt, I for one like this minimalist flat UI design. However, it looks too much like Edge.

>>59959071
There are people who don't use Nightly? WTF?

File: 1492742840473.png (100KB, 1920x216px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1920x216px

>>59994334
Retard.