So from what I understand, after a certain amount, the cache

>>59951518
You're dumb

>>59951572
*Your
retard.

The best deal in the Ryzen series is the 1600.

Cache sizes are only relevant for the engineers to worry about, the caches in the final products were sized specifically because they're the most efficient. They wouldn't waste die space if the cache didn't help.

>>59951596
WEL SORRY BUT YOU'RE MOM LIKED MY DICK SO FUCK OFF SHITHEAD

>>59951572

That's why people ask questions? To no longer be dumb?

Kys.

>>59951610

I'm looking for the best cheapo option for my gf who uses Corel draw and word. I will occasionally be using it for vidya. My main pc has a r7 1700, I just need a cheap cpu.

>>59951518
>So from what I understand, after a certain amount, the cache size has diminishing returns on performance
no.

>>59951664
The 1400 should be more than sufficient for that.

>>59951718
same guy here

Looking at the prices though the 1500x would be the better deal of the two imo. The 1500x has all the same things plus more cache and higher clockspeeds and a better stock cooler as well. I think that should make up for the $20-30 difference

>>59951784

I was planning on buying an aftermarket cooler and ocing anyway, so the stock cooler isn't much of a draw for me anyway, I can use the savings towards a decent cooler

>>59951704
Please elaborate.