>Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the

I have decentraleyes, https everywhere, privacy badger and ublock origin and I don't pass the last two tests. Also have do no track enabled in chromium.

>>59935316
you should install either uMatrix or NoScript and RefControl / RequestPolicy

>>59935316

You won't pass them if you install a shit ton of fucking addon ? Do you even understand what fingerprinting is on a web browser ?

File: 1492435210271.jpg (53KB, 700x730px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 700x730px

>>59935236
I wonder if anyone appears non unique now with the canvas fingerprinting

>>59935439

Well if you use a fresh install of firefox you might be, but if you want to be really bleeding edge on that just use tor, i2p or freenet.

Every other time I tested my browser was unique, now it's nearly unique. The match is probably me from a previous test come to think of it.

>>59935316
I have the same add-ons on mobile Firefox and fail the last two as well.

>>59935316
>>59935521

>Does your browser unblock 3rd parties that promise to honor Do Not Track?
why would you want to pass this one? you are basically blocking 3rd parties regardless of their DNT promise

>>59935439
noice

>>59935236
Is this botnet?

>>59935236
unique as well, wtf?

>>59935439
canvas blocker

Also https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.js/

>>59935316
Just use a useragent shuffler. Your fingerprint will always be unique but you'll always have a new, random fingerprint

File: i.jpg (108KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 640x640px

>>59936720
https://multiloginapp.com/how-canvas-fingerprint-blockers-make-you-easily-trackable/

>>59936756
a more complete list:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Firefox/Privacy

>>59936820
Didn't realize canvas blocker randomizes fingerprint on every request, that's indeed dumb and useless

>>59936820
>there are many people with same OS and GPU and their computers generates identical images. Especially on Apple hardware.
then why not make a plugin that just generates common fingerprints instead?

>>59936815
Wouldnt it be trivial to track you based on other, constant identifiers?

File: 1492364882344.jpg (85KB, 560x442px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 560x442px

>>59936997
yes