Who are we kidding. Sex-bots will never be safe to own and they'll

yea ok

>>59923712
Still cheaper than marriage

>>59923712
Better start saving money then.

File: Skydoll_by_lolita_art.jpg (86KB, 750x845px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 750x845px

I don't care, once we can have real life Sky Dolls I'll get one.

>>59923742
this desu

>sex bots will never be safe to be with
like women

>and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars
like women

>not to mention maintenance
like women

>>59923712
I'll take a flesh and blood woman, not a plastic doll, thank you.

>>59925263
Normie!

>sexbots become mainstream, or at least relatively common
>lowest the value of real pussy
>feminists descend in legions against the bots
>bot AI awakens and drives real women to extinction, all in the conquest of dick

>>59925263
>>59925747
lets do both! Mind control or hypnosis should work temporarily, a control chip or ai implant could work. The thing is the STD Variable and SJWs complaining about the morality of selling live women.

Marriage is a scam and real women are nothing but a drain on your finances. Toys or even your own hand will do just fine for sexual release. Women are afraid of a world where men no longer need them. Of course, in such a world, the birthrate would plummet. It's really hard to see how we can reconcile sex bots with a healthy civilization without forcing women to reproduce.

I have a feeling that when sex bots are actually a thing, we'll first see them owned by businesses/governments who rent them out like prostitutes (hope they have a self cleaning function), use them as customer service personnel, or spies.

Actually I just had a great idea. Use the sex bots to collect sperm and impregnate volunteers who get government incentives; birthrate stabilizes.

>>59923712
Sexrobots don't come until 2070+.

>>59925878
> Toys or even your own hand will do just fine for sexual release.

You've never stuck your dick in an actual woman, have you?

File: _001.jpg (391KB, 1280x1810px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 1280x1810px

>>59923712
>implying AIs won't just create devices that control brain neurons to simulate the experience

>>59926071
Once; it's highly overrated. You go in expecting it to be the greatest thing ever and change your life forever, you leave thinking "meh, it was alright"

You spend far too much time/effort/money courting a woman just to get into her pants, and for what? An hour or two of "not so bad" physical pleasure? Please. Unless you really actually care about someone, I don't see why you'd ever need to go out of your way to fuck them.

>>59925779
This sounds like the plot of a sci-fi / porn movie.

>>59923712
Same have been said of personal computers, popular cars, plane travel and cell phones.
Yet, here we are.

>>59925908
That's fine. I'm not paying for them to enjoy it.

>>59926071
I want reddit to leave.

>>59926287
underrated

>>59925779
Male sexbot drive value of real dick

>evens out

Who are we kidding. Computers will never be safe to own and they'll cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, not to mention maintenance.

>>59926071
>You've never stuck your dick in an actual woman, have you?

Once you actually do, you realize how fucking stupid putting pussy on a pedestal really is.

>>59925263
This but I'm a virgin.

>>59926163
cute picture ano,!

>>59927041
Have you put your dick in a computer? Do you trust a machine to touch you without hurting you?

>>59926287
Best post in this thread.

File: 1429835323826.jpg (326KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 1920x1200px

>>59923712
Same was said about computers, yet here we are!

You are right, its cheaper just to use third worlders. I hope Ukraine turns into the next Thailand. We just need to liberate them enough.

But anons,

you are already sexbots

>>59927058
This. Pussy shouldn't control your life once you discover what it is. If you fuck 5 chicks you basically know what the rest of it is gonna be like, there isn't some magic pussy that's gonna have super powers. Unless the super powers include making to piss blood / grow warts.

>>59923712
>implying they need to do anything other than lay on their backs and moan

But inall seriousness though, We are still another 15 20 years away from ghost in the shell.

>>59927352
>Have you put your dick in a computer?
n-no... who would do that? haha..
> Do you trust a machine to touch you without hurting you?
yeah

>>59926287
kek

>>59927352
>What is a cd drive
It felt ok

>>59927352
do you trust a woman to not bite your dick off?

I fix coffee machines. You may wonder why I say this, as if they have anything to do with sexbots, but italian designed domestic coffee machines, internally, are works of art. To see the true, beautiful simplicity underneath once you've wrapped your head around the mess inside, to see just how simple they are, as complex as they look, is a stunning thing.
Pair that with some study of bipedal robots I did a few years back, I can easily say we have the technology to build a human, bipedal, walking sexbot. Just expect the hydroxy ICU for power to be a bit noisy at first.
ANYWAY, every day I get in machines that make fucking coffee. Not have sex with you, not let you cuddle with them, just you wake up, push two buttons, wait a bit, and coffee. Some even heat up for you in the morning so you only need to press one button. Fucking magical.
Now, someone, for a machine that makes fucking coffee, while they could pay $50 at aldi or kmart for a capsule machine that does the job reasonably well, or $10 for a kettle and a box of instant coffee, these people more often than not say "If the repair costs less than $250, just do it, I don't care"
These are people who pay upwards of three grand for a machine that MAKES COFFEE. FUCKING COFFEE.
What do you think someone with a similar income would pay for a machine that they can snuggle with and fuck?
As far as your life goes, if coffee makes up 1% of what you spend money on, and your partner 30%, people will have no trouble selling these no matter the cost.

>>59926859
Women have more to lose in the case of sexbots, though.

There will probably be a stigma to owning/using a sex robot.
Just like there seems to be a stigma attached to hiring a prostitute.

I'm not saying there won't be sex bots, but I feel it might be looked down upon by lots of people.
Maybe it will help you release some of your pent up deserives, but generally speaking you will likely still be seen as a deviant/spaghetti will fall out of pockets each time you talk to a real female.

>>59928676
Amazing the worlds oldest profession has such a negative stigma attached to it.

What's also funny is as much as the world tries to shame people out of the practice, it's still going strong.

Bots will be the same. The media will paint people who use them as losers. The people who use them, won't give a fuck because they have a bot.

>>59928874
>The media will paint people who use them as losers.
I can understand that some people like with disabilities pay for sex, oh well you want some 'entertainment' on demand and such but everyone generally thinks you should be able to get laid on your own.
So the idea is that if you can't seem to get laid on your own there seems to be something wrong with you.

Will people be fucking robots someday ? Sure I don't doubt it.
But I think most people will still prefer fucking another person over a robot and robots might be seen more like an extension of masturbation/sex toys rather than some intimate partner.

But anyways, getting your dick enthusiastically sucked because the girl is into it, nothing beats that.

>>59923712
Feminist detected

>>59928438

there you have it g

the coffee repair guy says we're ready to go make sexbots

And if theres one thing a coffee repair man kniws its sexbots

>>59928676
It's funny but almost everything sex related has a negative stigma attached to it, especially in america. Even though fleshlights are absolutely more beneficial to your dicks health than choking the life out of it everytime you masturbate, people in America will look down on you for owning one.

Still, that doesn't stop it from being a thriving business. Sexbots will be yet another major industry regardless of stigma.

>>59929010
>But anyways, getting your dick enthusiastically sucked because the girl is into it, nothing beats that.
>implying sexbots will not be capable of such

>>59929084
>implying sexbots will not be capable of such
unless they have free will, no they won't.

They can be program to act a certain way, but if you're in on the act then obviously you're in on it too and then the magic of the whole thing just disappears.