Which one wins? I am a long term chrome user, just because I

Use both.

>>59922394
Tab mix plus. That addon has option of opening links to different sites in new tab without using middle click.

File: nightly.png (138KB, 620x277px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 620x277px

Make sure you install the best version of Firefox

>>59922394
>not using edge

Edge has ublock origins, lastpass and tampermonkey.

I would switch to edge if it got uMatrix. I would also like HTTPS everywhere.

>>59923161
POO

>>59923161
>Edge
>Ubuntu
Tipical Microshit shill, can't read.

Everybody loses

Chrome has the cleanest layout, no useless buttons. Also profile switcher >> switch between work and personal profiles.

>>59923161
>uhide meme

>>59924287
Chrome looks like shit on GNOME.

It was never a war. Chrome won after Firefox lost via walkover pretty much.

>>59924388
You could have just said GNOME looks like shit.

>>59922394
>botnet vs sjwshit
you choose


I prefer Opera. Chinese botnet doesn't bother me as much as Google datamining and NSA backdoors.

>>59923146
what makes it better?

>>59924747
Placebo

>>59922394
Chrome is botnet.

>>59922394
When I installed Gentoo I emerged firefox because chromium's source tarball was like 1gb while firefox was only around 200mb and I didnt want to think about how long it would take to compile that big of source files. But the more I look into it, it seems that chromium actually has more advanced security features like sandboxing, seccomp, etc.

>>59922394
A working adblocker
HTTPS everywhere
NoScript
RequestPolicy Continued
Self-Destructing Cookies
uBlock Origin

>>59922394
Firefox is neat to mess with, but takes like 12 minutes to open.

Chrome has the much more preferable search bar/URL bar combination. It could use some more customization applications though.

>>59926455
I'm serious, I've seen many people here recommend Nightly over regular Firefox, and I don't know why. I'm truly interested in knowing the benefits

>>59927280
It's faster and has a better icon.

>>59927325
As fast as chrome or just faster?

File: brave.png (24KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 300x300px

>>59922394
this one wins ofc

>>59927335
I tested ungoogled chromium against FF nightly about a month ago.
On average, I'd say chromium loads pages a bit faster, but it isn't really noticeable unless you have both browser open next to each other.
The issues with chromium though are that loading pages can be inconsistent, in that it will occasionally take a very long time to load a page for some reason. The UI is also not as customizable as Firefox.

If you really value the Google sync feature then you might as well stick to chrome/chromium. Otherwise give ff nightly a try.

>>59927373
>Otherwise give ff nightly a try
I'll be sure to do so, thanks

>>59927335
just as fast as the google ultron browser

>>59922394
Opera always wins. Get with the times

FF is good and has been basically the same year over year, don't have to worry about shit breaking, or losing your extensions

File: fe58fb93640cc29ca0f035f0d9ae3d39.jpg (69KB, 564x752px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 564x752px

>>59923161
>says to switch to edge
>edge is so bad that even he doesn't use it
What did he mean by this

>>59922572
Wut, why wouldn't you just middle click you nigger

>>59927280
Nightly uses 4 processes (e10s) instead of 1 like the current stable FF making it much faster (note: you can have 2 processes on stable branch if you edit about:config). Chrome already has multi-process so they're pretty much comparable speed-wise. I like FF's UI better and am not a fan of Google having ALL my data so I stick with FF. Firefox Photon is coming later this year which means big changes (especially to extensions).