>Ryzen is just 2 CPUs stuck together
How does a multi million dollar company just nigger-rig things like this?
Pentium D
But they're on the same fucking die.
>>59912997
Q6600
>>59913028
you're only marginally less retarded than H.M which means you are still an order of magnitude worse than the average moron who posts on this dead board. please leave
>>59913055
>H.M
Whom?
>>59913204
>*Whom've
>>59912779
>Kaby Lake is a 6 year old architecture
How does a multi-trillion dollar company just nigger-rig things like this?
>>59912779
You're right, AMD made a CPU out of fake cores, unlike Intel's real cores.
you think they'll fix this with zen2?
the latency between cores is way too high
>>59912997
D's nuts
you really should be asking yourself how a "nigger-rigged" cpu shit on intel's entire lineup
>>59912779
What's the fucking problem with it if it works?
>>59913238
And it's all built on P3 architecture anyway.
>>59913242
Well, they kind of did it with FX series where they called 2 ALU 1 FPU complexes 2 cores because MOAR CORES.
>>59913524
Because that means when a program isnt designed to use whatever black magic AMD pajeets coded itll run worse than a pentium
And that Ryzen 5 is a triple core processor in 2017
>>59913219
>Behooved?
>>59913037
The Core 2 Quads were two Core 2 Duos in the same package, not stuck together.
>>59913674
Shekels deposited into account confirmed.
>>59913674
>Because that means when a program isnt designed to use whatever black magic AMD pajeets coded itll run worse than a pentium
>making literally proveably false claims
>tyool JC MMXVII
>>59912779
I have found the sources of all the Ryzen problems.
This one is slightly shorter than the rest.
>>59914173
Literally the exact same shit.
>>59914173
>a fucking MCM for the core 2 quad
You're right, it's not the same. At least AMD had the competency to fab Ryzen's two CCXs on the same die, instead of nigger-rigging them together in packaging.
>>59912779
Everyone, the current state of /g/
>implying that's all there is to it
>implying there was no other processes or engineering involved to achieve this
>implying it even matters if it works
Congratulations on quite possibly the most fucking retarded thread this year.
sage goes in all fields
>>59914199
I can't belive their marketing department fucked up something like this
>>59914953
I don't know if you noticed, but they have no marketing department.
>>59913219
>>59914154
Go the fuck back to plebbit I'm so sick of seeing these dumbass fucking boilerplate pun chains on 4chan. There is no karma here; you will get no upvotes.
>>59912779
it's not two CPUs retard, it's sets of cores than can be added and subtracted into a die and interconnected to work as one. It means modular CPU architechture, they can easily swap out die space dedicated to a CCX with an integrated GPU. It's efficient, scalable design that allows you to design different dies much much easier and performance isn't hindered much. It also helps make the binning process much more flexible.
That's the reason AMD can scale to 32 cores, 128 PCie lanes and 8 channel memory while Intel is at 24, 44 lanes and 4 channel memory.
Look at the Haswell-EX die and tell me Intel doesn't do the same, come on, I'm waiting.
>>59915379
So it's nigger rigged
>>59916769
Irrelevant number masturbating, Intel cores are at worst 20% faster, PCI lanes is a meme over 40 and 8 channel memory is useless
>>59916926
Is this the power of delusion?
>>59916926
>i don't know shit about servers
>>59916952
yes
>>59912779
>Core i series is just an upgraded pentium iii.
How much of a lazy cunt can intel be.
>>59915361
FUCKING
T H I S
H
I
S
>>59917024
even if you used a jigsaw to shave off the part in contact with the seat she'd still be a fat fuck
>>59917024
>IRL_ditto.jpg
>>59912779
>Core i7s are just 4 CPUs stuck together
How does a multi-billion dollar company just nigger-rig things like this?
>>59912779
> oh shit, Xeons are just multiple CPUs glued together!
multi-billions companies can do it too, famalam.
>>59913055
What are you saying about Her Majesty, rebel scum?
>>59916926
Intlel is too shit to even function.
>>59919288
Intel, ladies and gentlemen.
>>59919358
B-b-but if you used 64GB DIMMs on the Intel instead of 32GB DIMMs it would be different!
>>59919358
b-but muh optane, m-muh 48TB of slow ""RAM"" will surely crush puny 4TB of RAM AMD supports
>>59919434
>having to swap out your nigger Kabylake-only NVDIMMs because they ran out of write cycles after a week
>>59919434
The thing is that no system besides Linux supports that much memory, and neither do Intel's CPUs, they're like at 5TB per socket tops.
>>59912779
>he buys 1CPU if he could get a 2 in 1 CPU