>years and years of fearmongering over running out of ipv4

>>59886670
It happened decades ago, NAT just worked better then anyone expected.

>>59886670
>oh shit guys, we have a problem! Quick, publicize it so solving it is easier!
>get everyone on the new protocol!
>smooth the transition!

>damn guys, why the fuck did nothing go wrong? It's almost like we worked our asses off to smoothly transition and alleviate all issues

>>59886789
Not an argument

>>it's fucking nothing
>Two layers of CGNAT is fucking nothing

>>59886789
This.

Liberalism works.

What happened to IPv6? Literally no one is using it

>>59886882
Painfully slowly transitioning

>>59886882
2/9 peers I'm connected to are ipv6.
I'm ipv6

>>59887008
>9 peers
nice sample size there faggot

>>59887026
https://u2.dmhy.org/details.php?id=17326&hit=1

There you go. Count the ipv6.

>>59887039
I don't have an account on your botnet website

>>59887066
Meh. You can't fix "pleb."

>>59887039
i'm not clicking that shit nigga

>>59887311
>he's never heard of U2
You really don't belong here.

>>59886670
We actually do need more IP addresses. However IPV6 is a literal disgrace. Network engineers don't want it, nor give a fuck about it. It's overly complected and is actual homo. It also has snoop elements to it. IPV6 will probably fail. IPV6 != future.

>>59887342
>doesn't know about some chinese tracker for anime
>"lol you don't belong here xDDDDDD"

File: 5443643.png (135KB, 1134x977px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1134x977px

>>59887375
This

Even Theo de Raadt has talked about how bad it is.

>>59887039
>130 seeders
no thanks

>>59886670
>ork engineers don't want it, nor give a fuck about it. It's overly complected and is actual homo. It also has snoop elements to it
Google, Microsoft, Farce Book et al want you to use it to make you easier to track. good goy.

>>59887375
> However IPV6 is a literal disgrace. Network engineers don't want it, nor give a fuck about it.
IPv6 is fine, It's actually simpler than IPv4 and easier for routers to handle. It's network engineers who are a disgrace, most of them too lazy to learn any new technology.

>>59887375
even basic networking with ipv6 is a pain in the ass, if you want to connect to ipv6 manually enjoy memorizing what, 60 characters?

>>59886684
I'm ambivalent sbout NAT. I think it's elegant, but at the same time it's no longer possible for two computers to connect through the Internet without NAT traversal. It's no longer direct

File: IPV4.jpg (548KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 900x675px

>>59887523
Kek.

The only country on the planet with significant up take of IPV6 is ching cong japan (probably need for all the sex robots) as the men no longer have sex with the sexy slanty eyed women.

The rest of the world doesn't give a fuck about IPV6 AT ALL.

It's almost like it's a solution looking for a problem.

It is garbage, it will never be adopted even with google trying to push it (makes it easier to track you + send you ads)

IPV4 is here to stay until maybe the IETT pull their finger out of their assholes and stop licking google pussy to come up with a beter solution.

Also, Ian killed himself because of ipv6

When will IPv8 come along and fix all these problems?

>>59887603
Every 4th person to join my gameranger rooms has to be kicked because of NAT. Freaking sad, only a handful of people still play red alert 2.

>>59887523
He's not wrong this time...
In particular the last parts.

My take on IPv6 at home has been to block it on iptables, the only use for it nowadays is to get spied on.

>>59887654
When companies decide they can finally spend a few bucks and upgrade that 30 year old legacy device running some ancient COBOL program. So never.

>>59887659
What do you mean has to be kicked?

>>59887659
That doesn't make the least bit of sense, unless several players are trying to connect from the same place at once.

>>59886882
i absolutely refuse. its hard enough to memorize an ipv4 address or a phone number, no need to add fucking letters into it

>>59888052
Ever heard of DNS?

File: golden_wind_bs.jpg (104KB, 500x489px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 500x489px

>>59888052
>memorizing ipv4 addresses

>>59888052
what if i want to connect to a gameserver that i dont own via ip?

>>59888138
whoops meant for >>59888093

>>59886882
Almost 20 of connections to Google are ipv6

>>59888138
If you connect to that one often put an entry on your hosts file. Now you don't need to remember the number, only the name.

>>59887726
What the fuck is wrong with cobol nigger?

>>59888168
ok thanks

>>59886670
yes it was and today it is even more so.
people talk about IoT being a giant security risk and all but in reality most of private internet doesnt need internet routable IP's NAT is more then enough for you avarage user(home&mobile)

once IPv4 kicks the bucket and you only get IPv6 its going to be the golden age of ddos and intrusion.

>>59887598
>memorizing the addresses when networking

Didn't realize /g/ was this computer inept.

>>59888181
I thought you died with the meteors.

File: candle.jpg (16KB, 200x185px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 200x185px

>>59888181
> You take no candle!

>>59888221
i am looking forward to this, already upgraded my programs for ipv6

>>59887342
Who the fuck cares about some shitty normie band?

File: pfsense.webm (59KB, 500x332px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 500x332px

>>59887598

Wow, so hard.

Just came to say ipv6 is pure shit and badly needs replacement

>>59888181
>Running some ancient warehousing program from 1980 written in some 1960s version of COBOL on some mainframe from the '70s that only uses reel-to-reel tape as storage, yet it has to be connected to the WWW and talk to the companys webstore somehow is COBOLs fault.

Okay. Pretty sure it wasn't what he meant, but okay.

>>59888243
fuck off back to momsnet faggot

>>59886670
Stop calling everything "le meme xD" you fucking moron.

>>59888243
>>59888371
>hey wow i want to connect to my ftp server but im not near my computer!
>normally i could just write down the simple 10 digit number and connect but now i need to pull out this napkin and spend 30 minutes writing the whole string
are you really saying it is easier to deal with ipv6 than ipv4?

>>59888159
A whole 20 connections to to all of Google, truly a huge amount of users.

File: main.png (248KB, 1021x872px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1021x872px

>>59887039
>https://u2.dmhy.org/details.php?id=17326&hit=1
Is this some minecraft fansite?

>>59888138
>>59888168
Or just register a domain on a shitty TLD for like $1/year.

>>59889183

This situation will never happen for these reasons:

1. Your FTP server is not intended to be accessed remotely. You have no ports forwarded, so it wouldn't be accessible anyway.

2. You intended for your FTP server to be accessed remotely, so you either save the IP address in your email, write a script that updates an IP address on a remotely accessible server, or you actually have a domain pointed at that address.

I have a sub domain pointed to my home IP address, from a domain I already own, because I host a few things. People connect to my services via IPV6 all the time.

Like I said, you're just technically incompetent.

>>59889277
>minecraft
What's that?

>>59889338
situation happens literally every day for me since i use my ftp remotely from my phone to stream music

>>59889400
https://www.google.com/search?q=dns+for+dynamic+ip+free

>>59886882
>What happened to IPv6? Literally no one is using it

Some absolute cucks use it because they can't afford good internet.

how hard would it be to fuck with ports to let some given port (65536?) define "we're going into the extended range now; similar to how utf8 gets done

>>59889484
ipv4 is easy to remember, this is unnecessary for personal use

>>59889596
Yes, and so were 2 digit phone numbers. But now we have address books.

>>59889635
phone numbers are just as long as ip addresses though, ipv6 is unnecessarily long, they could have just allowed letters in the protocol and suddenly it would open trillions of combinations

>>59889298
The kid wants to connect to other game servers (without known FQDN)without having to write the IPs down on a post-it.

That's literally why the hosts file was invented. Your answer is retarded.

>>59889684
Then save the IP? I'm confused at how you have trouble saving a 256 bit number in this day and age.

File: 14404909597932w.jpg (15KB, 336x365px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 336x365px

>>59889553
Not exactly this, but what about using reserved IP ranges instead of ports? Like, say, add a fifth field: 127.1.0.0.1? Or maybe even using ports as an identifier, like you said.

Also, there's probably something really stupid about this that I'm missing.

File: 56778897856784.jpg (30KB, 670x503px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 670x503px

>>59890719
>save your ip on a mobile device

>>59890836
Why is this bad?