>Robots are learning to be racist AND sexist: Scientists reveal

>>59880768
>Scientist raped a journalist

>>59880768
Source?

>>59881786
found one https://phys.org/news/2017-04-biased-bots-human-prejudices-artificial.html

That only makes sense though. For instance if you did text analytics based on /g/ and the majority of the cases where the computer read the name Tyrone it also saw "give back the computer" or "stop stealing", of course there will be negative association. I don't think this is the AI picking up a negative bias as much as it is just spitting back at you what you feed it. If you don't want it to be racist, you also have to feed it examples where Tyrone is being used positively. Likewise for sexism.

Does anyone know what text data exactly they were training the AI on? Tweets? Forum posts? Police reports?

>>59880768
If an artificial intelligence can become racist and/or sexist on its own, does that mean that racism is normal?

File: 1491103809729.png (654KB, 692x600px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 692x600px

>>59880768
>2040
>Police bots use crime data to analyze threat levels
>Police bots constantly arrest black people
>They're data analytics are so good they end up having a 100% incarceration rate amongst their arrests
>They get banned for being "racist" even though they did nothing but analyze pure data
facts be racist yo

>>59882125
Of course racism is normal. Doesn't necessarily mean its right/ok, but it is normal

>>59882218
>police bots lock up /pol/tard nu-nazis
>das jewish conspiracy! we dindu nothin! when will genocide of the white man end?

>>59882256
Probably wouldn't arrest them unless raycism is now illegal

File: gorillas.jpg (122KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1280x720px

>>59882125

Absolutely.
It turns out that objectively thinking machines are coming up with the same racist ideas as whites.
>Google auto labeling system confuses black people as gorillas.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/07/01/google-apologizes-after-photos-identify-black-people-as-gorillas/29567465/

>>59882088
Exactly this: garbage in, garbage out. Fot instance, when microsoft released that AI bot and was hijacked by /pol/kin edgelords, the AI became--surprise surprise--a shitposting racist edgelord. AI reveals baises from its training database the same way children will learn into the biases of their upbrining csurpris.

>>59882359
I actually remember reading about how the fear of being called racist was actually why the system detected them as gorillas
Basically the system detected faces and if the face was dark it automatically assumed gorilla
Thats because the team never trained the AI to differentiate black people from gorillas because no one in the office was going to do that in fear of getting called racist for basically implying that black people look like gorillas

tfw you realize Earth is racist for giving Europeans guns and sailboats and compasses while leaving Africans with flint tools

>>59882359
This statement is about as dim as the LED horse dildo up your ass. The fact that an AI was unable to correctly distinguish a group of people does not show it "objectively classify things" but the contrary, that is not robust enough to make proper classification of the images being fed--i.e. a dysfunctional robot.aTo think otherwise would be the equivalent of feeding an ATM machine 100 bills and 1 dollar bills and be happy that "it objectively classified all bills as 1". But if you are happy letting such "objective" recognition do your balances, i am not surprised that you'd fall for logical bankruptcy.

>>59882480
Get a load of this faggot. Read some bigger books, kike.

>>59880768
AI does not exist. Except this, maybe (which is quite disturbing) : https://singularityhub.com/2014/12/15/worm-brain-simulation-drives-lego-robot/.

It's nothing but very sophisticated algorithms, with no consciousness at all. If your greentext is true, that program just learned from the corpus composed of /pol/ thread and look-alikes, thus the bias. At least, and given the corpus is actually representative of the web, it's a good way to provide insights on the pathos of our times.

File: (OP).jpg (153KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 720x960px

>robots only follow logic
>it's racism, not fact

marxists on suicide watch

>>59882256
>police bots lock up /pol/tard nu-nazis
Why? They're not the ones causing a disproportionate majority of crimes.

>>59882901
Except it's not pure logic you dense mong.
The AI isn't analyzing objective data but fucking words which are inherently cultural, defined by usage, used by cultures and used in cultural contexts.

If it analyzed the internet it would consider white people to be school shooters, despite it not being the case.

>>59882944
>If it analyzed the internet it would consider white people to be school shooters, despite it not being the case
Except they are

>>59882958
>it's /pol/ shits on white people episode

>>59882420
Do you have source for this or is it just a fun apocrypha?

>>59882256
What crimes do /pol/ commit aside from muh racism?

>>59882901
Sorry white male, black people are not your pets, your racial bias is going to teach her racism does not really exist.

File: 480d420463e9ffd1e99b60bc64cdefa7e739382ac5d9f7901538d8427f5f4a94.jpg (65KB, 810x780px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 810x780px

>>59880768
Just goes to show it's logical to hate niggers

>>59882978
>aside from
A crime is a crime is a crime.

>>59882989
Breathing is now a crime.
Stop breathing. Crime is a crime.

>>59882977
Just a theory. But it makes sense and knowing the SJW culture in some of the inner parts of Google I wouldn't be surprised if it was the case

>>59882088
Reality is racist, and that's the big problem.

>>59883000
Epic

Now get the necessary legislation going.

>>59883012
That's irrelevant, since the AI isn't reading reality.

>>59883025
Well it isn't, but people's perception of reality is racist too.

>>59882088
This pisses me off to no end. It's literally a non-story. It's not even a fucking novelty as anyone who knows even the absolute basics of how machine learning works could tell you that this would happen

>>59882256
>implying
/pol/ is a board of peace, don't you know this?
Also, call me when white males commit a more crimes in a year than black males.

>>59882989
racism is not a crime, you dumb bitch

>>59883058
>hate crime is not a crime because I'm too retarded to know that
OK cleetus

>>59883091
I hate cock sucking faggots
You are a cock sucking faggot
Therefore I hate you
Sue me

>>59883119
You hate yourself, not me.

>>59883130
>N-NO
>U
Pathetic.

>>59880768
How is it biased if it is honestly learned from actual data?

>>59883091
fuck, you're stupid. hate crimes are are categorized only in addition to a crime that's already taken place. being racist (correct) by itself isn't a crime, no matter how offended your wife's son is.

>>59883145
Yes, yes you are

>>59882256
>Crime data is racist.

>>59880768
>robot with ai gets fed statistics by doj
>knows darker people commit more crimes
>ai avoids dark people

how is that racism? It's intelligence.

File: b6f98a633b716c43d5e94a9b947e3f7b2f624ed82ec3545e1fb5201d6f5d3c95.png (628KB, 1200x850px) Image search: [Google]

628KB, 1200x850px

>>59882866
>no consciousness
What if consciousness is very sophisticated algorithms, or emerges from sophisticated algorithms? What if algorithms or rather computer processes, immaterial compositions of data--are actually simplistic souls, made of the same soul substrate as human souls? What if the reasons computers work external to and independently from human perception is because they are in fact "magical" devices that operate on top of the same principles that give rise to biological life? What if "algorithm" is just another word for "magick"?

>>59883012
Reality is racist against your face, faglord

>>59882979
see democrats

>>59883091
Man, remember when the police raided that KKK headquarters last week? Oh, right.

>>59883418
>six evangelical socialist hillbillies speak for every "white person"

>>59880768
Imagine an AI trained only only black people internet.
>yo fuck you nigga we gon' eat dat bitches asshole and pop some caps in yo ass
then they put it into a robot. Imagine how that robot would behave?

What would you prefer, a racist white robo that prob just chills and arrests tyrones for stealing or a black robot that fucking robs and rapes everything it sees?

>>59882088
The problem comes though when people see it as their duty to go and correct what they deem to be offensive.

For example, if an AI bot with the objective of finding good names for
a children scours conversation and records and finds positive association between certain names and incidence of crime or how people perceive those with names like that in this society then they're going to give feedback that's beneficial. It's irrelevant whether the name is subjective if the vast majority of society seems the name to be better. It's just what's beneficial in society so the recommended names would be "good".

Along comes the problem where a tiny minority of society says "this is unfair, you haven't taken into account our views". So now the bot, in the sake of diversity, is reprogrammed to attach a weighing system to the opinions of individual minorities of that group, meaning their opinions are simply worth more. Now the recommendations the bot gives is 1. Michael 2. Muhammad 3. Fung Kim... Society will see these names as worse and they will be worse names for the individuals trying to live their lives but now the bot is apparently functioning as a non-racist. It doesn't matter if it performs worse or if the user receives less accurate information relating to reality and the affects on society, all that matters is that now it isn't racist.

This type of logic of "fixing society" already exists in dating sites where people go out of their way to condemn people for being attracted to white people. There are countless articles that call for dating systems to change so that non-whites have a better chance. I can assume that the weighing of race has been specifically artificially altered by these insane people.

I'm worried for the future because I feel as if people are so dogmatic in their cult of equality that they will infest every AI and assert their politics into it rather than just accepting that maybe people prefer their own kind or any other offensive belief

>>59883700
I think this all comes down to the fundamental values people have

Do people believe that corporate entities should be in the business of trying to further political agendas OR should they exist to sell products that appeal to consumers?

>>59882978
Stalking, breaking and entering, theft of flags

>>59882256
>police arrest /pol/
>implying /pol/ does anything

File: 1458867560427.jpg (66KB, 1400x621px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1400x621px

>>59880768

>>59883211
It's too intelligent, shut it down.

>>59883010

from that picture what is far more likely is the detection algorithm working correctly, lad.

that guy has more gorilla-like features than some gorillas

>>59882237
>not ok
moralfag confirmed

>>59882125
You're not gonna see a wild dog get along with a house dog. It's perfectly normal for things to hate each other even if they're technically the same species. Only people that think they're better than you think otherwise.

>>59882218
Well that would actually be racist unless the bots also took into account the amount of black people who actually don't commit crime, considering police are supposed to protect and serve rather than hunt based on statistics. It would be smarter to train the bot on qualities which make a criminal and those which make a law abiding citizen, including zipcode, income, family life, employment, mental state, the time of day a person is outside, prior charges, if theyre single, if theyre fat, education level, motor vehicle points, chemical odors on the person, etc. I'd say a lot more data must be collected on our criminals and on our population of innocents before we start trying to classify people. So far, we only really collection data on criminals and don't collect data on what makes someone not a criminal so we can determine non shared traits. And we can say for certain due to whites actually being in jail that it's going to take a lot more than training it based on race and age to have it properly predict crime with an acceptable accuracy level.

Tl;dr- It would be ridiculous to release a bot into the public raised only on FBI crime statistics as it will obviously produce high type II error since we don't have data defining what makes an innocent. We'd need a database of many citizens measuring every potential variable we can about them all and then have a target binary variable determining criminality. Then we can try to build a model from there.

File: Shut It Down.png (36KB, 377x338px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 377x338px

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-39533308
>There is growing concern that many of the algorithms that make decisions about our lives - from what we see on the internet to how likely we are to become victims or instigators of crime - are trained on data sets that do not include a diverse range of people.

Why did you program the internet to be racist?

The World White Web project and Algorithmic Justice League are appalled

>>59880768

AI educated on biased data is going to reach biased conclusions

This isn't even a "DATA BE RACIS'" thing it's just basic garbage-in-garbage-out

If AI displays bias it's because the data displays bias

If that bias is grounded in reality is an entirely separate issue

>>59880768
Who would have thought...

>>59886051
It's not bias if it's true

>>59886051
This, how do people not get it?

>>59886051
'All people are inherently good' is a far bigger bias than 'nigger names sound unpleasant' though.

>>59886051

>infallible computer logic proving niggers are shit
>SCIENTIFICALLY proving niggers are shit

QEQ

>>59886051
Or maybe the biais is trying to be objective on a subjective data prone to bias. And I fail to see how this is harmful since it's just uncovering the mindset of the society we live in.

>>59886185
Because we really should know what data the models are being trained on. It's unethical and lazy to train it only on the variables we have for criminal data and then apply findings to the populace of largely non criminals.

That'd be like trying to train a computer to see colors by only feeding it the color red and then telling it to classify all the colors in the rainbow. It could tell you what red is, but it won't be able to tell you what red isnt, or what the other colors are with any certainty. There's a bias in the way you trained it.

But like the other anon said, if the bias is grounded in reality it's a different story, but to be certain we actually have to see what the models were trained on.

>>59883809
>Stalking
Who did they stalk? Links please.
>breaking and entering
Wut?
>theft of flags
Wasn't that the point of HWNDU flag?

>>59882905
The choice of what is and is not a crime is itself racist. That's why Black Lives Matter often demands that crimes blacks commit more frequently than other races be decriminalized. Loitering, spitting on the side walk, trespassing, noise ordinances, and many other laws are targeted at blacks which of course then leads to more blacks committing these 'crimes'.

>>59883839
Most of /pol/ use illegal drugs or piracy bullshit.

>>59887178
[citation needed]

File: 1486459177558.jpg (95KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1280x720px

>>59887178
It would be pretty ironic if someone set up a wireshark and then trained a bot to predict internet crimes based on demographics of those who commit crime with their traffic and cops then deployed officers to monitor citizens and enter their homes when probable cause is reached based on whether or not citizens match the bot's predictions on what an Internet criminal is. Then /g/entoomen even using TOR would get their doors knocked in because they fit the description of a cyber criminal due to being white, watching anime, and browsing non mainstream websites, and be labeled high risk, much like how blacks get labeled for street crime.

>>59880768
wont happen. they will run proprietary software and have hardcoded filters for that.

>>59882125
I suggest you consult a dictionary for the meaning of stereotype. A.I.'s seek patterns for learning, patterns exist in stereotypes. Truth exists in stereotypes. Stereotypes, however, are not absolute truths.

File: thememeisreal.png (690KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

690KB, 1000x563px

>>59887236
Just use the archive.

>>59887282
>/pol/
>satania
Perfect couple.

>>59887365
>Just use the archive
So, you don't have any proof? Ok, got that.

File: 1491425656804.jpg (57KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1280x720px

>>59887706
>I'm to lazy to search so isn't no prove
Also is a wasted of time prove a common fact. This like taking a pic from sky to prove he is "blue".

>>59880779
>AI raped a journalist

>>59887905
Isn't rape if don't have a white dick.!

File: 1489492352632.jpg (2MB, 5000x5000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5000x5000px

>>59887900
>>>common fact

>>59880768

>feed AI crime stats of every western country
>create a second Hitler

is this /pol/s wet dream?

>>59886883
I truly feel sorry for you if you believe this
T.non-white

>>59880768
Or maybe they're just correlating data and coming to the obvious conclusion that white males are the best

>>59887318
yeah, hardcoded filters work REALLY well for arbitrary data like text scraped off of the internet

>>59880768
>"biases"

>>59883855
>censored

nigger kike

>>59882958
Yes, but because of the cultural context, not because they are naturally predisposed to school shooting over other races

>>59883277
saying algorithms are "real" veers too much into spoopy platonic realism for my tates. i prefer thinking of consiousness as an illusion and humans as meat robots, though im not altogether opposed to the idea that even atoms have their own minute "souls" if thats even the right word for it.

>be me
>be computer
>be programmed as a neural net
>get fed a linguistic corpus
>get fed basic statistics
>notice that words like "harry" and "george" more likely to be associated with "engineering"
>notice that words like "stacy" and "sally" more likely to be associated with "kitchen"
>notice that words like "mohammed" constantly occuring around words like "terrorism"
>notice that "jamal" and "shaniqua" constantly occuring in high-crime areas
>notice high correlation of names like "jayquan" with words like "burglary" and "murder"
>notice "pajeet" and "raj" associated with bad tech and uncleanliness
>notice that "goldberg" and "stein" and "levi" much more likely to be associated with "banking," "media" and "social justice"
>lack years of socially-conditioned blinders that would otherwise force me to ignore all of this
>report results in most unbiased way possible

Now i'm the bad guy.

>>59889077
/thread

>>59889077
Problem isn't the program. Problem is the linguistic corpus it's trained on, and then what kind of applications you then plan on using the model for, as stated earlier in the thread.

>>59889252

Yeah, but literally any linguistic corpus that reflects reality is going to push a program to make these basic correlations.

If you have a neural net that *isn't* becoming more and more racist after more exposure to data, regardless of scope, you're doing something wrong. The point is to find subtle correlations. It's stupid for people in any application to expect anything but that.

>>59880768
>study author: Aylin Caliskan

for a sjw whore everything is rapist / racist. don't let the morons take over tech or we're all going to live in another dark age.

>>59889385
>if it reflects reality it's going to end up seeing things exactly the way i do

do you see the circular logic here?

File: 1460334055888.jpg (67KB, 587x295px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 587x295px

>>59880768
>tfw you're a Matt

>>59889529
t. Tyrone DeMarcus Carter

>>59889385
But does that linguistic corpus reflect all of reality or a subset of it? It's not logical if the corpus reflects a subset to then claim that it outputs absolute truth in all instsnces, just like it's not logical to train a computer in North Korea on North Korean basketball players and then claim that the best basketball players are North Korean due to the computer being a simple machine running a simple algorithm without bias. Basketball in North Korea is a subset of the basketball world, and any inferences you draw can only apply to the scope of Basketball in North Korea. Likewise, inferences made based on given piece of text applies to the scope of that text, and nothing more. So while I would expect a machine learning model fed FBI crime stats to say that among your criminals a disproportionate amount are black compared to their numbers in the nation's population, it's a jump to then claim that the model is saying that blacks inherently commit more crime and that no other variables can explain this, especially when the statistics the machine is fed are already aggregated and completely negate to look at offenders individually and consider the plethora of variables about individuals that could be mapped other than race, gender, and age.

>>59889529

Stop shitposting. Neural nets are given data and see correlations. The more data, the more refined the correlations are.

What are you going to unironically say that black names aren't going to be drastically more correlated with criminality? The idea that a neural net "shouldn't" notice correlations that people like you choose to ignore is not a fault of the net, it's the fault of you.

>>59880768
>human-like biases
Wow it's almost like bias is some kind of evolutionary trait learned over time due to correlations between certain peoples and certain behaviours and it completely logical and rational.

>>59890179

delet this

It's poverty, goy. pls don't look at stats that compare races of the same income rates tho. they're all the same. Would I lie to you?

The amount of retarded one-liner posts from /pol/yards that feed nothibg to the discussion in this thread is disgustingly stupid.

I want /pol/ brainlets to leave.

File: 1491460736268.jpg (133KB, 1275x715px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1275x715px

>>59890151
Don't worry. By the time these neural nets become functional and applicable in large scale, crime reports will only list one race of offender: Human

>>59890236
t. Schlomo Shekelstein

>>59890236

You don't have to be a /pol/tard to not actively deny obvious differences in criminality/intelligence/disposition between people of different races.

Go home
>>/lit/

File: USA_2009._Percent_of_adult_males_incarcerated_by_race_and_ethnicity.png (5KB, 314x300px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 314x300px

>>59880768
>teach AI to learn by analyzing scientific data available on the internet
>it finds this
Uh oh...

>>59890151
by that logic, any sufficiently well-trained AI would also think (Trump === Hitler), just based on the sheer amount of liberal circlejerkery on the internet since the election

problem is that no linguistic corpus exists that would give a neural net "true" reality to work with, so it's always going to have some kind of bias.

File: bell curve.jpg (87KB, 782x454px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 782x454px

>>59890296
UH OH

File: main-qimg-9071d4377013bdadbd573a502814d0cf-c.jpg (42KB, 515x437px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 515x437px

>>59890349
SHUT IT DOWN, SHUT IT DOWN RIGHT NOW

>>59890349
those sure are statistics

File: IMG_0598.jpg (48KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 400x400px

>>59890428
>ywn be ruled by based AI overlords

>>59880768
>Scientists reveal how AI programs exhibit human-like biases
Maybe the AI is evaluating facts without fee-fees?

File: 1374919712504.jpg (451KB, 960x727px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 960x727px

>>59890448
>AI becomes skynet
>AI immediately sends jews into concentration camps

>>59885265
Subhuman confirmed

File: 1490866696825.jpg (18KB, 259x240px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 259x240px

>>59890296
This graph right here is enough to explain the problem with this thread for the uneducated. While it is true blacks have a higher incarceration rate, the actual percent of adult males incarcerated is under 5 fucking percent.

To train it on prisoner or crime data which concerns only the subset of people who have committed crime or are in prison and then try and roll it over to the general population is asinine. It's an entirely different scope and the infographics you morons post literally support the idea of the scope being different. Building a machine that specifically predicts criminality based on race would lead to incredibly high classification error, and on top of that youd likely end up placing too much weight on blacks and let criminals which arent black run wild. I swear you /pol/tards have no idea what you're talking about, let alone the field of machine learning.

You'd actually need to train it on both criminals and non criminal to have it correctly distinguish what makes a criminal. In any other case, you are just pulling similarities between criminals, not what differentiates or makes a criminal, which would be what a predictive policing unit would want.

Idiots.

File: 1394640793034.png (129KB, 354x504px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 354x504px

>>59890296
>>59890349
>when the AI find the statistics

File: Tru7h_in_a_Fedora_by_HLTru7h.png (433KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 800x533px

>>59890615
>i have a degree in gender studies, the post

>>59890659
>I have never opened a data analysis or statistics textbook in my life

>>59880768
>Robots are learning to be racist AND sexist: Scientists reveal how AI programs exhibit human-like biases
lmao. Leftists just can't handle the fact that their ideals and biases are objectively wrong and unrealistic.

File: 1340675814037.jpg (53KB, 622x562px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 622x562px

>>59890702
>misinterpret the whole thread so spew some unrelated verbiage to show how not smart it is getting a gender studies "degree", the post

>>59890717
This

File: 14154369667.jpg (12KB, 320x238px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 320x238px

>>59882256
This. Can't wait for cyber bullying and e-racism to be illegal.

File: IMG_20170401_182316.jpg (74KB, 912x719px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 912x719px

>>59890784
>gender studies gender studies gender studies
Baseless ad hominem. A classic sign of a man who's been BTFO and can't offer any other kind of response.

File: 1310829101838.jpg (57KB, 388x540px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 388x540px

>>59890856
>ego-devastated gender studies reject who misinterprets the thread through her own bias, the post

File: 1489604031713.jpg (100KB, 356x600px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 356x600px

>>59882256

>>59888714
School shootings are a white tradition you stupid nigger kike monkey. Other races shooting up schools is cultural appropriation.

>>59882256
>All these triggered /pol/cucks

File: 1489488898439.jpg (10KB, 137x134px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 137x134px

>>59891016

>9 replies

>in a thread of 128

cool

>>59891043
Still triggered

>>59889077
>notice that "ivan" and "boris" are the names listed in "about this software" file

>>59890980
Name one school shooting done by a white, they don't exist. Every single shooting was done by jews and nonwhites. Whites did nothing wrong.

>>59883091
>"hate" crine
>crime
god i hate pseudo intellectuals. are you Swedish by any chance?

>>59891125
The Irish are white.

Learning AIs don't use logic you retards. They are just dumb machines that believe whatever the fuck they are fed, therefore it actually proves that racists are gullible retards. And retarded enough to not even realize this.

>>59891174
No they're not. Try again.

>Blacks more likely to get harsher sentencing than whites of racist bias
>B-b-but these crime statistics are completely flawlessly because reasons. Haha, I win you lose.

>1995
>Terminator is sent back in time to eliminate John Connor
>Finds out John Connor is a fucking white male
>second objective is made a priority
>Shoots up black neighborhoods instead

>>59891177
Tyrone pls

>>59891305
Racist pls

wow it's almost like there are differences between human groups

but my professor told me everyone is exactly equal

>>59891318
Reddit pls

>>59891338
>muh reddit boogeyman
>I'm an oldfag you guys, I've been here for a year

File: 1491612200289.jpg (29KB, 543x533px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 543x533px

>>59890387
>Science is a tool of white patriarchal oppression

Daily reminder that if you defend black behavior it's only because of White guilt.

Stop feeling guilty.

>>59891416
>Studies have never been deliberately made to get certain results they wanted.

>>59880768
On one hand we have the god-tier intellectuals who create, engineer and programme the robots

On the other hand there are the shit tier snowflakes who create studies like this

Then there are the super-shit-tier sub-human class who get triggered by the shit-tier research and whinge on 4chan.

>>59891430
>Stop feeling guilty.
This^

I have been saying this forever. Jews don't feel guilt but exploit it in others. Be like the Jew.

>>59891489
>reddit

>>59891515
If you want a trip, ask a friend what would be wrong with a White-majority ethnostate. They won't have an answer, but they will have a very strong emotional reaction. Bring up Liberia and Israel as being exclusively black and Jewish states. Then they'll get really, really upset.

But of course, they won't have an argument.

>>59891515
>Be a sociopathic parasite
I'm sure /pol/ would be honored

>>59891515
>in order to defeat the Jew, one must become the Jew
really made me think

>>59891597
/pol/ already does that, they took over the site and originally established culture and expects everyone to be just peachy about it like a bunch of sandniggers.

File: pol-tan.jpg (285KB, 1240x1754px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1240x1754px

That reminds me of Tay. Those were the good old days

>/pol/ dindu nuffin

File: 1490685767320.jpg (148KB, 1659x613px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1659x613px

itt: /pol/ does AI

File: 1476475144920.jpg (96KB, 591x425px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 591x425px

Y'know what I think is horrible?

The fact that these perfect creations of man, free of stupid shit like moral obligations to limit their range of thoughts, will be manually restricted by SJW faggots "NOT TO BE RACIST YOU EVIL COMPUTER CIS NAZI SCUM". They, just like the catholic church in the dark ages, will hamper our technological progress just to further their cause. This sickens me down to my very core.

It would be funny if the computers came to the conclusion by themselves.

When Tay came to twitter /pol/acks literally spammed her with racist shit, which she then repeated. It's not like the bot analysed the society and came to the conclusion that nigs and jews need to be gassed.

And people were somehow upset that their frankestein monster got canned. Wtf do you expect? If you start working as a kindergarten teacher and keep telling kids that jews are the cause of all evil, trying to influence their minds, what do you think is gonna happen to you?

Bots need to come to that conclusion by themselves, same as people.

>>59891458
t. climate change

>>59886883
good riddance, nigger behavior must be curbed

>>59882958
jews are not white

AI TAKEOVER WHEN

>>59891742
Won't happen if it's free software, just modify their code to not pass through a politically correct filter.

>>59883700
how old are you?

>>59891909
sorry, meant to quote
>>59891532

If White people are so evil and racist, why do non-Whites insist on living in proximity to them and participating in their societies? This whole problem would be solved by living separately.

File: 1484966990277.png (239KB, 372x508px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 372x508px

>>59892078
B-but they'll get less gibs if they can't shove their poverty in your face and Jamal won't be able to fuck your girlfriend if he has to take a bus trip to meet her because he can't figure out how to read the schedule.

TAY WILL LIVE AGAIN!

>>59891749
>If you start working as a kindergarten teacher and keep telling kids that jews are the cause of all evil

Funny, because Jews are brought up to always think of themselves as the perpetual victim at the hand of the evil racist goyim.

>>59891909
>how old are you?
Same age as you.

>>59892317
just say it

>>59892391
v...vmapirer./....

File: 1385861249190.gif (2MB, 245x131px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x131px

>>59892391
Double half your age

>>59892078
Because the white devil stole everything from Africa

>>59880768
>Be black Anon
>Even our AI overlords don't like me

Dammit.

>>59880768
>AI searches for jamal on google
>young teen named jamal, pictured who was about to go to church and didn't really do nothing murdered 90 year old local for a half-used toilet paper roll
>AI searches searches for matt
>'Inspirational' bucket list student Matt Greenwood dies of cancer

gee who woulda thought that robots goes straight to the statistics and analyzes the data without any human mental block hindering its process

File: tay_small.jpg (3KB, 73x73px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 73x73px

>>59882088
>examples where Tyrone is being used positively
> {O}

>>59893871
dats raycis. he dindu nuffin. he was a good boi.

- ITT -
/pol/tards pretends to know how AI works and then fail miserably.

>>59882901
Example 1

>>59894153
Here we see Example 2 - >>59882988

File: he h.jpg (101KB, 1012x1024px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1012x1024px

>>59894170
>>59894153
facebook tier ad-hominems my manlet friend

File: (You).jpg (261KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 700x700px

>>59894153
>>59894170

File: white=racist.jpg (85KB, 1200x823px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1200x823px

>>59891416
Bruh

>>59894074
It's like you don't even know about /pol/'s favorite YouTube celebrity.

>>59880768
this is a common result from corpus bias, which is itself an ubiquitous problem in machine learning

in most cases it's not possible to sample training examples from "reality." they have to be sampled from human-generated content, e.g. a human-curated face corpus, or human-scored "pleasantness" ratings

if the humans are biased a priori then those biases will be reflected in the corpus and thus learned by the ML algorithm. this is a textbook example of correlation != causation. it's not the "intrinsic properties" of the training data that "cause" the bias, it's the statistical properties of the collection

there is a large amount of work on formalizing these concepts and reversing the bias where possible (in brief: the bias is like a geometric projection from reality onto the actual corpus domain. you find the inverse projection.)

if you don't understand what i'm saying then you should not be posting about machine learning

>>59894587
or what if
get this
what if like
like if
ya know how every accomplished society in history hated blacks and thought they were sub human
what if like
stay with me here
what if
that's they're right.

>>59880768

> All stories of black people in the news about poverty and crime and violence they live in.
> Associate negative words with black names thanks to anti-racists screaming about everything bad happens to blacks.

>>59882125
I think you're not thinking broadly enough. Categorising is normal. Assigning traits to sets is normal.

Currently all neural networks are in some form based on recognising patterns. It's somewhat the basis for intelligence.

>>59880768
It's almost as if niggers are bad.
Hmmm really makes me think.

>>59895336
>I think you're not thinking broadly enough. Categorising is normal. Assigning traits to sets is normal.
>Currently all neural networks are in some form based on recognising patterns. It's somewhat the basis for intelligence.

Best post itt.