[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Purported iPhone 8 schematics show ‘bezel-less’ front, rear

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 95
Thread images: 11

File: img_0248.jpg (33KB, 440x336px) Image search: [Google]
img_0248.jpg
33KB, 440x336px
https://9to5mac.com/2017/04/13/purported-iphone-8-schematics-show-bezel-less-front-rear-touch-id-same-thinness-as-iphone-7/

>In what is the first supposed leak of ‘real’ iPhone 8 technical schematics, an image posted to Weibo today claims to show technical drawings for the next-generation iPhone straight from Foxconn. The drawings depict an iPhone 8 front and back with minimal bezels on the left and right sides of the screen. Compared to an iPhone 7, the top and bottom bezels are also significantly smaller.

>On the back, the dual camera system and rear flash is stacked vertically in the top-left corner, with a gap for a Touch ID fingerprint sensor below the Apple logo. The image is labelled with dimensions for the chassis, which are comparable to the 4.7-inch iPhone 7 — despite the significantly larger screen

Are you getting the iPhone 8?
>>
>>59872942
>I'd rather stick with touchjizz
>>
no headphone jack no purchase
>>
>>59872964
>no floppy drive, no purchase
>>
>>59872930
They should have made the touch ID in the shape of the Apple logo and got rid of the cosmetic one.
>>
>>59872930
Please no fingerprint sensor on the back PLEASEEEEE
>>
>>59872979
t. cum guzzler
>>
>>59872964
>No headphone jack is bad meme


why do you autists do this? The headphone jack is legacy tech that needs to dye, the only reason companies keep it is because they're too scared to remove a shitty port that NOBODY EVEN USES

it's like using a serial port on some ancient wangblows box, or a VGA port, and anybody who thinks otherwise is probably some poorfag who can't afford the superior sound of digital bluetooth

plus why the fuck would anybody want analog sound anyways? analog is the tech of the 1800's

we moves on from that like, fourty years ago faggot gramps
>>
>>59873003
what color would you dye it?
>>
>>59872930

Apple pls
>>
>>59873003
>headphone jack
>nobody even uses

Confirmed for retarded
>>
>>59872930
SE masterace reporting in. I like my thick phone that stays in my hand. Thin phones are impossible to use without a case to give then grip.
>>
>>59872930
Fascinating.
>>
>>59873003
>port that NOBODY EVEN USES
99,9% of all headphones/audio equipment do, and it's perfect.
>>
>>59872930
>Touch ID fingerprint sensor
Why not just mark people like cattle with GPS sensors and give them actually functional and useful device instead?
>>
>>59873124
Take your meds autist
>>
Copying the disgusting rear-placed fingerprint sensor from Android manufacturers would be the creative downfall of Apple.
>>
>>59872930
Nice camera bump
>>
>>59873073
Get a separate music player faggot.
>>
>>59872942
>>59872973
Am I being hacked
>>
>>59873362
>paying more money for a basic feature that a phone should have in the first place
How's your wife's son doing today?
>>
File: 1470168469468.jpg (8KB, 250x238px) Image search: [Google]
1470168469468.jpg
8KB, 250x238px
>>59872930
>"bezel""less"""
>still has bottom bezel for no fucking reason
it's galaxy s8 all over again. but at least it probably won't have wasted bottom bezel space PLUS software buttons
>>
Who was the first one to do the fingerprint on the back? Swear they were chink phones
>>
>>59872955
>assuming Android aren't costumizeable like apple
>being this brainlet tech illiterate
>despite all that, still on /g/ and hasn't killed himself yet
explain.
>>
>>59873003
I also like my headphone jacks colorful! Which colors do you usually dye your headphone jacks, anon?
>>
File: cryingfrog.png (46KB, 619x453px) Image search: [Google]
cryingfrog.png
46KB, 619x453px
I got a girlfriend today.
Should I explicitly ask her to give me blowjob
because this is what I wanted in my life?
>>
>>59873362
>Take a step back in technology
Just like Apple!
>>
>>59873661
>>59873512
stupid pepe apopo posters
>>
>>59872930
is it going to be powered wirelessly by steve jobs spinning in his grave at 9000 rpm?
>>
File: 1490493752365.jpg (24KB, 290x364px) Image search: [Google]
1490493752365.jpg
24KB, 290x364px
>>59873721
not an argument
>>
>phone leaks
it will be rectangular and have a screen
>>
>>59873661
You "got" a girlfriend today? As in you've been seeing this girl and obviously having sex with her for months now and you've just today decided to be exclusive? I suppose you could ask her for a blowjob anon, sure.
>>
>>59872930
fake. Apple will never put touch ID on the back (either under the screen or it doesnt move)
but the vertical camera position gives it away
there's literally no benefit to doing that
>>
File: qqlol.jpg (90KB, 786x786px) Image search: [Google]
qqlol.jpg
90KB, 786x786px
>>59873601
>browses /g/
>cares so little about his privacy he uses an iPhone
Reddit pls
>>
>>59873601
Fuck off ESL-kun.
>>
>>59872987
That's what I thought too, that would be perfectly possible and look nice, but 2017 is more like Microsoft and doesn't even know what they're doing anymore.
>>
>>59873575
Yes, and every big functionality improvement was always implemented on Android first
>>
>>59874378
>but the vertical camera position gives it away
>there's literally no benefit to doing that
bullshit.
most photos are taken in landscape, so lenses will be side by side and allow a wider angle.
>>
>>59873003
>he shills for apple _for free_
200% SHIGGY
>>
>>59875316
And improved and perfected by Apple

Thank you, Apple
>>
>>59873003
>nobody even uses
>most used audio interface
You wish, cuck
>>
>>59877079
most people just use the headphones that come with the phone.
they don't know nor care that it's now a lightning connector
>>
>>59873003
people actually fell for this
>>
>>59872964
/thread

t. BT earbuds owner who uses his cable earbuds while his BT ones charge for hours every day.
>>
WHERE IS THE IPHONE 7s ??!!!

WHY IS ERYONE TALKING ABOUT THE IPHONE 8, when the 7s isnt even out?
>>
>>59877349
>Given the major changes Apple plans to introduce to the iPhone in 2017, it seems unlikely the device will receive an "S" name, so there's a good chance Apple may decide to skip directly to the next full number, naming the 2017 iPhone the iPhone 8.
https://www.macrumors.com/roundup/iphone-8/#naming
>>
>>59872930
Looks like a G6 ripoff
>>
>>59877302
Except that I get 24 hrs of listening time from 1 hr of charge time on my airpods. Combined with the fact that I listen to them 4-5 hours a day, I need to charge them maybe once a week.
>>
>>59879526
You do not get 24 hours of listening. You get an hour tops from those tiny 100mAh batteries in there.
>>
>>59879699
You get about 4 hours of listening time on the actual pods and 24 hours with the charging case.
>>
>>59873003
I know this post is just fishing for replies, but the saddest thing is there are actually people out there who legitimately believe this.
>>
>>59879737
I doubt the airpods themselves get 4 hours of continuous play, and them sitting in a charging case is not listening.
>>
>>59879755
Are you stupid?
>>
>>59872930
If this is really going to be the iPhone 8, Hello Note 8!
>>
>>59879788
>Advertisement
No, but apparently you are. Post a video of 4 hours of consistent music playing on airpods and then we can talk.
>>
>>59872930
>Are you getting the iPhone 8?
Not even if you paid me.
>>
File: 1492032871986.png (46KB, 174x238px) Image search: [Google]
1492032871986.png
46KB, 174x238px
>>59879806
>"Out of the three truly wireless buds I tested, the AirPods lasted the longest amount of time on a single charge—about 5 hours."
>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/02/battle-of-the-buds-how-apple-airpods-stack-up-against-other-wireless-earbuds/
>>
>>59879844
If I was paid to own an iPhone I'd gladly take it. Would keep using my S7 Active though.
>>
>>59879844
Sure you won't mr Xiaomeme shill.
>>
>>59879737
>and 24 hours with the charging case
So you mean having to stop using them to charge multiple times without having to charge the case?
>>
>>59879855
>5 hours
>Nowhere does it say 5 hours of continuous play like you stated here: >>59879737
>>
File: 1446224955884.jpg (125KB, 451x492px) Image search: [Google]
1446224955884.jpg
125KB, 451x492px
>>59879858
>wanting a device that spies on you
>not using a C2D laptop with Coreboot and the ME disabled to access the internet
>not using an iPod classic for music and podcasts
>not using a flip phone and removing the battery when you're not making calls
Wew.

>>59879865
>using offbrand chinese shitphones
"No"
>>
>>59879874
3 hours of listening time with a 15 minute charge isn't bad at all. And since I keep them in the case while I'm not listening them anyway, I run out of battery on the actual pods very rarely.
>>
>>59872999
only good front fingerprint was the S7's with a slim design and other useful capacitive buttons next to it. iPhone home button takes up too much space and doesn't add much. I don't even use a lock screen on my phone though so idc about some useless fingerprint thing.
>>
>>59879904
>3 hours of listening time
>>>59879737 says 4 hours
>5 hours of listening time? What do you need 4 hours of listening time for? These can do 3 hours, I swear! They only work for two? I said they'll work for an hour, goy!
>>
>>59879943
They give you 3 hours of listening time if you keep them in the case for 15 minutes.
With full battery they give you 5 hours (claimed by Apple), I said they give about 4 since I actually own a pair.

Are you that retarded?
>>
so its basically the s8 with an apple logo?
>>
>>59879985
4 hours tops of idle (not continuous sound) time is not enough for someone who has to list the amount of music he listens to in number of albums. I will keep to my M50X's with 3.5mm plug, and you fuck off with your ear-dicks.
>>
>>59880023
>15 minutes in the case will get you 3 hours of playback
http://www.soundguys.com/apple-airpods-review-good-11072/
>>
>>59880121
>Apple's hardware runs better on Android
No way in hell this is real. Post a video, not just unsupported claims.
>>
>>59872930
fake af
>>
>>59880151
It says they manages 4 hours on Android and 4.5 hours on iOS
>>
>>59880151
Why would this surprise you? Apple sucks shit at optimizing their operating systems.
Windows 10 runs better on Macbooks than MacOS does.

http://www.laptopmag.com/articles/windows-10-vs-os-x
http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-10-unequivocally-better-than-os-x-on-apples-new-macbook/
>>
>complain about no headphone jack
>wanting to use pleb tier dac in phones
>not carrying battery back to power your desktop grade dac and paring it in Rhodium coated, pure 7N silver usb cable, vacuum jacketed and oil insulated.

Am I in /g/ or what?
>>
>>59872930
That's not touch ID on the back, that's the "wireless" charging area.
>>
>>59873003
>nobody uses vga ports
>vga ports somehow worse than objectively cancer shit like DP
KYS
Y
S
>>
I really dont get why people want phones with no screen bezels, especially from Apple. Phones with really slim top/bottom bezels look bad. The thick top/bottom bezels, speaker, and home button design is nice and that set is what makes an iPhone an iPhone.
>>
It's fake. If not, it's an early concept. Apple would never put Touch ID on the back like that. It's ugly and looks stupid. Besides, it's not even in a comfortable place.

If integrated into the Apple logo, sure, but not like this. Disgraceful.

I do, however, love the camera design. About time they just combine them.
>>
>>59872930
No thanks I'll just buy iPhone 7 Plus.
>>
>>59872930
>camera bezel
>touch ID placement somehow worse than Galaxy S8
>>
this looks horrendous
sad where phones are going
honestly, Apple design has been shit since 2014
>>
>>59883729
Meant >camera bump
>>
>>59874378
Why can't they locate the touch ID sensor in the logo?
>>
>>59873003
9/10 bait
>>
>>59873287
but i can unlock my phone as i'm pulling it out of my pocket
>>
>>59873003
>guaranteed replies
>>
>>59881304
back is allegedly made out of glass, why would they need an ugly, special area
>>
>>59883774
1. there could be internal pcb restrictions like it's alleged for the S8
2. logo is currently mirror-polished, but touch id would ruin that with fingerprints.
>>
>>59883157
>It's fake. If not, it's an early concept.
rtfa
>As shown in the table, this is supposedly an image of design drawings for the iPhone 8’s Engineering Validation Test third revision. EVT is an early stage in the Apple product development cycle, the device must still pass through Design Validation Test and Production Validation Test stages before it is finalized.
>>
>>59883788
people on the internet just like to hate.
touch id on the back is a valid design trade-off for an edge-to-edge display.
in the future when touch id can be integrated in the front glass, apple can even keep the design.
>>
>>59872930
At the beginning apple was the one who was dictating the trend in the smarthone industry, now apple is following the trends of others.
Wew I didn't through we would get to this point.
>>
no. i'll just buy some chinkshit when my chinkshit finally breaks
>>
>>59873003
I love how retards like you are called out every single time they try to voice their worthless opinions.
>>
>>59873003
Bluetooth latency can be greater than copper
>>
>>59880236
Biggest lie in the world. No windows os can out perform a linux or Unix kernel. Especially win10 which is the slowest its ever been. Windows is shit with ram and wastes cpu processes
Thread posts: 95
Thread images: 11


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.