Why isn't there any new news about quantum computers? Was

It's just a meme like nuclear fusion power and that space drive that produces more power than it receives.

>>59868541
They're pretty useless outside of a few fringe applications that maybe like 100 people in the whole people care about.

>>59868567
whole world*

"It can be a 1 AND a 0!"
M A G I C

>>59868541
No I actually went to a talk about quantum computers from a business in Europe that is working on them. Quantum computing is further then people know. The last year there were things they still struggled with which they discovered were easily solvable. Now it is just a matter of setting up production for quantum computers which they will actually deliver in 2020 according to their roadmap. The estimated time for quantum computers to be able to crack AES is already in 2022 which isn't that far away anymore. For now the quantum computers already have 50 qbits.

>>59868610
any introductory book for programming in them or are they going to port shit like java to be usable on it?

>>59868610
Yesterday they said tomorrow. Alphabet computers (each letter of the alphabet is a state) will be relevant before quantum computers ever are.

>>59868541
There was a maymay about quantum computers being able to crack all encryption. If this is true, why aren't we working on a new encryption algorithm that is resistant against quantum computing?

>>59868692
Because it's already been invented you fuckhead. Just Google it, holy shit.

>>59868692
There already is such a thing. The one time pad.

>>59868642
Unfortunately I'm a sysadmin/network engineer so I don't know where to look for good rescources on programming for them.

>>59868648
Since the event I attended was for the customers they would need to have real balls to lie about it since they're already taking orders and if they can't deliver there image would take serious damage.

Also they aren't the only once being close to completing the machine. IBM for example is also very close already.

>>59868737
To be fair they started working on fusion reactors in the 1950s as well and we still don't have anything viable.

>>59868737
Honestly? Go to your local university. Find the guy teaching the honors section data structures and algorithms course for seniors. Ask him.
It's pretty likely that he will actually know, understand, and be able to teach quantum algorithms.

>>59868610
AES is already completely broken thanks to a flaw, anon. You don't need a quantum computer to crack AES.

>>59868924
[citation needed]

>>59868692
Because I'm not a pedo?

>>59869082
>le nothing to hide maymay

Some people would love it if you didn't encrypt your bank account.

>>59869082
Anon, we think you are a pedo. Please post your bank credentials so we can check whether if you paid a dark net dealer for cp or not. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear, amirite?

>>59868924

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/19/aes_crypto_attack/


> “This research is groundbreaking because it is the first method of breaking single-key AES that is (slightly) faster than brute force,” Nate Lawson, a cryptographer and the principal of security consultancy Root Labs, wrote in an email.

>>59868541
Like one of those guys said:

>Neven—who helped write the Google research paper, released earlier this week, that details the company’s experiments—compares the D-Wave to the airplane the Wright brothers flew at Kitty Hawk in 1903. The Wright Flyer barely got off the ground, but it foretold a revolution. “Their airplane took a trajectory through the air,” he says. “That’s the point”

So basically these computers might be useless right now, but they will be a revolution once people really know how to use them.

>>59869022
I'm just giving you a free tip. You can ignore it.
>>59869204
That's not it.

They have a very specific use. They'll not be used in general computing.

>>59869183
>sharing my bank credentials to everyone on the internet is the same thing as letting the po po look through my hdds
LMAO do you guys actually hear yourselves?

>>59869337
>That's not it.

Well then be daddy and show us what we need to see.

>>59869405
No, thanks. Don't use AES.

>>59869434
Give us a good reason to use Twofish, Kuznyechik or Camellia. Otherwise, eat shit.

up

>>59869696
Eat shit then, anon.