Who funds the gnome developers and why don't they want the

they want to be unique rather than usable

>>59840685
Microsft Windows funds the devs, which sould explain the second part of that question.

Redhat

>>59840685
GNOME is the mother of the 90% Linux/Unix DEs out there.

>>59840993
What a whore

There's nothing wrong with GNOME.

>>59841005
Ur mum

>>59840685
It's usable, for tablet.
For desktop you must use tiling wm, velox\sway\orbment etc.
GTK+4 is best toolkit for GUI. It will use vulkan for rendering.

File: hw_4.gif (296KB, 300x100px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 300x100px

>>59841042
mullins ausfahrt

>>59841042
Tell me more about GTK+4

https://www.gnome.org/foundation/

>>59841070
it's the future and gnome is the only project with the manpower to adopt it quickly, this will only be more true once canonical gets in on it

if you are using anything other than gnome you hate progress

File: customization_converted.webm (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x768px

>>59841292
this

>>59840685
>inb4 that one guy who hates GNOME bombards the thread with bull shit

Do people not know that you don't have to use the software that comes with GNOME? Its literally the only argument Unity faggots have. KDE and Xfce on the other hand are normal people that don't care.

>>59841024
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/printing-booklet-duplex.html.en