Who around here is >Pentium III And will not fall

all intel users?

>>59837207

Pentium 4 users are not

>>59837177
Sorry but

>8086 masterrace

File: r6ah9OSm3K3LJNeRPjTMstM0bJC.jpg (155KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1280x720px

>>59837177
Recently got myself a nice slot-1 machine with whopping 1GHz PIII. Runs like charm.

Tualatin 1.4GHz owner reporting in

File: 89a2ba35834243e67d40cea6c542fed6.jpg (29KB, 402x300px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 402x300px

>>59837177
> not shitposting from an ATMega
shiggy

File: spaceheater-2k3.png (33KB, 432x427px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 432x427px

>>59837177
I transcended the x86 meme long ago, your registers mean nothing to me.

>>59837177

Its not a matter of falling for it, its a matter of being dragged over the edge and into its chasm. Same with 95% of technology standards.

>>59837177
I've got a dual 1.1GHz PIII / 2GB system under my desk here. Haven't touched it in a while though.

>>59837177
My main computer still is a PIII 500 mhz with 384 mb of ram and a fx5500(256mb).

Running debian + ratpoison.

>>59840657
>fx5500
actually worse than a fx5200

I'm running a Core Duo on my main machine, no 64 bit meem here

>>59837177
Thought I kept my PIII 1Ghz longer in action than most. I had to upgrade it because I wanted to play H264/V9 in their original framerate for once.

>>59837177
>Not using an Athlon XP
Enjoy being stuck at sub 2 GHz clocklet

Dual socket all the way.

Windows NT truly is superior to that DOS based stoneage technology.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3s0_yf2mS4

Athlon 750 was my old system. Slot A. Had to replace the fans three times.

>How many gigahertz has your CPU?
0.75

>>59838002
>shiggy
back to r*ddit with you

>>59844318
Back to pbskids with you newfag
>2017
>wasn't on /g/ in 2010
shiggy

File: vmac.jpg (7KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 500x500px

Pentium N4200 here.

File: Itanic-348x196.jpg (27KB, 348x196px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 348x196px

>>59838113
Near, far, wherever you are...

>>59844318
>diggy

>>59837177
But more bits is better anon

>>59838113
>Itanium
>not running HP-UX
the plebbest of plebs

>>59844485
86>64
checkmate

>>59844766
I wish. It was a one-off IBM entry into the the market can't even run most Linux distros because of its proprietary architecture that makes all the HP code shit itself.

>>59842068
but the XP was such a clocklet they had to PR rate it

I hate 64bit. It erased the 4GB limitation that was keeping bloat in check.

>>59844080
>Linus Torvalds
>from Sweden

>>59846166
and it allowed the rest of the world who are worried more about getting work done than micromanaging resources to accomplish more
>>59846186
>fennoswede
same shit

>>59847083
Watching videos in a higher resolution or playing 4K games isn't "accomplishing more".

>>59847266
no, but working with larger values and data sets certainly is

>>59848012
>>59848012
>larger values and data sets

Which only came about due to the previously mentioned bloat.

>>59848012
>without 64bit the government wouldn't be able to catalog and cross-reference everything we do and say on- and off-line

Sounds good to me desu

>>59848060
not really, there have always been problems mainly in the sciences and engineering that dealt with values beyond the limited range representable by 32 bits and datasets that generally required far higher memory capacity than that offered by limited 32-bit addressing

there's a reason the high end jumped to 64-bit as soon as it was available in the early '90s, there's more to computing than the small problems you solve at home, and the less cycles you have to waste fetching from and storing in memory/the more data you can access from large memories instead of slow ass spinning rust, flash and network resources, the better

nobody in the real world cares that it hurts your feelings when a web page doesn't load as fast as you told yourself it should ten years ago

>>59848209
many of the world's most pervasive surveillance states existed long before the internet became mainstream, that's a matter of storage anyway

File: 20170411_172555.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

I was cleaning up my car when I saw this post
I've still got this sitting in my trunk, for it new in the box, only cracked it open for some pictures
Where do I find a mobo for this that won't break the bank? Could make for a cool windows 2k machine

>>59844990
I wonder when we'll have a 32 bit OS since clearly, smaller is better.

>>59837177
what the fuck am I looking at?

File: vw540.png (74KB, 1100x838px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1100x838px

>>59848452
All I can tell you is to keep on checking eBay for a cheap 440GX board if it shows up, Xeon boxes, especially desktops were rare as shit and ultra-expensive. I've seen exactly one slot Xeon workstation in my lifetime.

>Could make for a cool windows 2k machine
I run 2K on dual PIII Xeon 500s and it's pretty good, the PII Xeon is balls deep in NT4 territory though, and it would fly with that OS too.

>>59848396
>nobody in the real world cares that it hurts your feelings when a web page doesn't load as fast as you told yourself it should ten years ago
Don't listen to him, anon. I care!

>>59844080
>all this blatant shilling for something that will brick most computers

microshits go home, I'm not upgrading from 95 until my PC implodes

>>59844411

His heart will go on. :-(

(((64 bit)))

>>59844080

Think Gates plowed that chick? Or maybe Ballmer threw a chair at her.

>>59837177
posting from a t6400
Hoping to get a t9600 or Q9100 and stick it in this laptop if it'd be compatible and maybe add some more ram. It'd breath new life into this almost dead POS.

It also needs a new battery and something to dissipate more heat but the performance is the biggest issue.

>>59837177
What's it like being retarded?

i remember having a PIII desktop growing up. fuck that was a long time ago.

>he doesn't have at least 4 cores and 8 threads, and 3.5ghz clock
LMAO CPULETS
T. Ryzen 1800x in my desktop and i7-7700HQ in my laptop

>>59844369
not the anon you replied to, but...
bitch i was here when /g/ was fucking /g/uro

File: 1484712439095.png (146KB, 671x519px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 671x519px

>>59850231
>T. meme falling pro

>>59848716
a hard drive

>>59849599
i'd believe Ballmer throwing a chair at her

>>59850374
The gaymer laptop in that image reeks of intel and nvidia though...

>>59851826
he uses a jewtel laptop though...

>>59848693
ARM is 32 bit

>>59848716
a cpu cartridge you fucking chitlin

>>59837177

Still using two Pentium III 1Ghz machines, With Win98. They are slotted like the PIII in OP's pic, though.

I'll be getting the Asus CUSL2 motherboards recapped soon to avoid problems,

>>59837177
Pentium M masterrace here.

>>59837177
didnt know intel made hard drives

why did they stop

>>59837177
>Falling for the electricity meme

>>59855918
They make ssds

>>59856000
Hard drive =/= SSD

>>>/reddit/

>>59855394
Safe from the botnet

>>59856173

Pentium III was the first to use serial number identifiers in the chips.

You're safe with Pentium MMX.

File: Nintendo-Switch-FreeBSD.jpg (70KB, 970x606px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 970x606px

>>59848716

You gotta be 18 to post here, buddy.

File: Blank+_73c9afc5ec2eeafe7eee87a96effe73f.jpg (168KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1000x750px

>>59856387
>safe with Pentium MMX
Good to know

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88ancHxItOc

Enjoy living in the past.

>>59856471
kids born in 1999 will be 18 this year.

>>59855951
>falling for the technology meme

>>59841108
How?

File: test.png (10KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 640x400px

>>59859280
nvidia logic

File: IMG_20170412_185137.jpg (4MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4160x3120px

You are all such newfags...

>>59844080
>full frame sixty frames per second transitions

I miss the times people cared.

>>59859592
PII 100℅ UNBOTNETTED quake 3 runs fine