>/g/ recommends me to install firefox nightly >decide to

>>59824045
>/g/ recommends me to install firefox nightly
When did this happen? The browser wars have been over for like two years. Chrome won.

Is qtwebengine botnet?

File: 1384235761035.jpg (25KB, 680x383px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 680x383px

>Gah. Your tab just crash
>Gah

even crashing firefox is better than gugle

>>59824186
Just get ungoogled chromium, not that hard.

>>59824203
you can't take the water out of a watermelon

File: dried_watermelon4.jpg (415KB, 700x467px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 700x467px

>>59824292
Um, sweetie.

>>59824337
gr8 b8 m8 they're not dried you can clearly see from the reflection that they contain water

File: southernplate-watermelon-jerky-400x300.jpg (39KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 400x300px

>>59824424
Um, no sweetie

>>59824439
but does it have the same taste, tho?
ofc you can ungoogle chromium, but it wont be usable

>>59824549
Unusable how? I haven't noticed anything wrong with ungoogled chromium.

File: 2016-05-05.png (61KB, 1004x1374px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1004x1374px

>>59824045
I have never seen that page.

>>59824058
Ahahahahahahaa. No. Only tech illiterate people and Google shills use Chrome or its derivatives.

File: dlr.jpg (18KB, 426x562px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 426x562px

>>59824045
> chromium
> ungoggled
Better try Iridium, if that's your thing.

>>59824640
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-selection_bias

>Gah

Only Tumblr people say this.

File: 2016-09-17.png (21KB, 1029x419px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 1029x419px

>>59824654
It's true though. Why do you think Chrome has such a massive marketshare? Not because it's the best browser. IE was the most used browser for a long time. Google just knew how to effectively shill their browser.

>>59824680
>>59824654

File: 2016-09-19.png (34KB, 1035x715px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 1035x715px

>>59824693

>>59824733
So you run these yourself. I don't think there's a formal fallacy for "lying."

File: 2016-09-01.png (109KB, 1036x2640px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1036x2640px

>>59824760
They were posted on /g/ (date is in file name). So all users of /g/ were able to participate. I've actually only made one of them myself. The others were from others. At times Chrome was ahead. But Firefox ended up winning every time.

>>59824789
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-selection_bias
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking

>>59824805
Make a poll to prove the opposite then.

>>59824811
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-selection_bias

>>59824823
*yawn*
can you actually reply with a proof that >>59824058 was right, instead of posting your inappropriate wikipedia links? i've shown you more than enough proof that most of /g/ uses firefox

>>59824843
>proof
Try reading.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-selection_bias

>>59824045
This happens all the time. I want to use Nigthly but it just fucking crashes.

>>59824852
yes, polls are a legitimate form of gathering data. asking people which browser they use is a very simple question everyone can answer. probably not to 100 % representative. but if multiple polls at different times with different objectives form the OP (some where Chrome defenders) all show the same result, you can assume that they are good enough.

>>59824878
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-selection_bias

>>59824974
You can't even explain it in your own words, can you? Otherwise you'd see why posting that link over and over is just hilariously stupid.

File: 1488838845373.jpg (95KB, 375x500px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 375x500px

>>59824045
>Gah. Your tab just crashed.
>We can help you!

Tumblr tier browser

thats why i switched to chromium after i had some tabs crashing

>>59824045
>installs nightly
>complains about a crash

Remind me again why I visit this board when it's full of retards.

>>59824652
ungoogled chromium contains the full set of iridium patches

>>59825001
It went over your head, eh? Rather explains your Failfox usage.

>>59825050
>blames RAM errors on the browser
Like no ones had tabs crash on chrome.
Fucking kill yourself.

>>59825125
>moving the goalposts
it's ok to admit defeat. we're all anonymous here

>>59825147
>still doesn't understand why self-selected responses are unscientific

>>59824045
>Gah!

Insert voldemort.jpg

>>59825165
>still has nothing to show that would support his hypothesis of Chrome being favored by /g/
>still only tries to argue by dismissing opposing arguments with something he has just learned last week in school

>>59824058

People who recommend Firefox usually stick up their nose at the though using anything but Nightly despite having no reason to use it.

>>59825202
You're obviously new here. Lurk moar.

>>59825232
Did you just crawl out of /b/ or something?

>>59825232
jesus christ, jewggle did a bad job at training you for this. ask your mentor for a better script

>>59825232
>ad hominem
now you've definitely given up

>>59825260
Don't use words you don't understand.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

File: output-2017-04-10_15.26.01.webm (2MB, 840x524px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 840x524px

>>59824045
You think that's bad? Watch this!

>>59825273
>completely dismissing what I wrote
>calling me new (attacking me directly)
yes, i would call that ad hominem

>>59825307
You need to learn the difference between an argument and a statement.

>>59824045
>Ungoogled Chromium
kek is this meme still going?

>>59824622
That's because it isn't """ungoogled"""

>>59824805
>>59824823
>>59824852
>>59824974


>I can't make a point in my own words

Then you should stfu and go back.

>>59825399
Run it through Google translate a few times if you need different words.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-selection_bias

>>59824045
Use Waterfox

Gnome Web Master Race

>>59824045
>Ungoogled Chromium
Literally does not exist. FF is for people who value privacy.

>>59824045
this is what you get when you trust Hit/er.

>Use an unstable version
>encounter a bug

WOW XD

File: 1464746458878.jpg (26KB, 655x527px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 655x527px

>/g/ would rather sleep in a condemned apartment building than a mansion with cameras in it

>>59825420
You don't even understand what it is yourself. You just keep posting that link as if it would make a difference. Not being able to explain it in your own words proves even further that you actually have no clue what you are talking about.

>>59825420
Look, I can post random links to wikipedia articles without explaining how they are relevant to the discussion in any way too!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conospermum_glumaceum

>>59826028
That would be:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)

>>59826324
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Edinburgh_District_Council_election,_1984
Checkmate atheists.

>>59824439
>>59824337
>sweetie
mentally deranged trap or troll detected

>>59826678
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)

>using nightly for everyday browsing
you retards never cease to amaze me

>>59826786
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winsome_Evans

Nightly is the best version of Firefox, and just as stable as the stable branch.
I've been using it for almost a year now.

>>59826786
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innenministerkonferenz

>>59826950
>just as stable as the stable branch
except when it isn't. like in OPs case.

>>59826989
It's a fake picture.
That's not what the crash page looks like.

>>59826924
>>59826975
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)

File: Capture.png (35KB, 858x640px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 858x640px

>>59824680
why are you showing straw polls? they literally mean nothing.

https://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php

>>59825376
it actually is though. It's very easy to verify since it's open source and since you can capture network traffic at the OS or router level to confirm. It basically just involves removing google API keys from the source.

>>59824292
You can tho

>>59827226
Because we are talking about /g/. And there are no publicly available stats of the browser usage on /g/. So the next best thing is to just ask.

>>59827497
Which is less than worthless because of:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-selection_bias

>>59827047
not that guy but nightly literally fucked html5 like a week ago and you couldn't watch any videos be it jewtube or anywhere else, it's not suited for everyday browsing and no one should be recommending it, if you're gonna recommend something at least say dev edition

>>59827532
If you would just understand what that actually means, you would see that you are wrong.

File: Josuke.jpg (810KB, 900x1038px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 900x1038px

>>59825557
>>59825376
>>59825369
>>59824652
When there's this much shilling against a privacy-respecting browser, its because its doing its job.

>>59827257
>>>59825376
>It basically just involves removing google API keys from the source.

Not just that, it also remove any binaries when building (regular Chromium download pre-built binaries by Google, ungoogled-chromium builds everything from source), applies domain substitution (to change every Google domain in the code to nonexistent ones - if there would be privacy-invading code left, it will fail to connect because of this) and applies patches from Iridium and Inox.

It's an excellent browser overall. My issues with it are the same of regular Chrome/Chromium: it fucks your workflow if you have too many tabs open.

>>59827556
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot

>>59827691
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot

>>59825628
But i was told that it's rock stable and has no problems.

>>59827786
Did you not read what it was?

>>59827542
Werks on my machine

>>59827226
>chrome users dont generally block analytics websites
wow, color me surprised

File: 1477910764750.jpg (120KB, 519x535px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 519x535px

>>59824045
>Gah