arch doesnt have these problems >hurr ubuntu is easy they

just change your resolution then famalam

>can use arch
>too dumb for ubuntu
made me think

File: Screenshot at 2017-04-09 13-54-24.png (99KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 640x480px

>>59812620
this is the only resolution option here

>>59812651
thats unusual; which graphic card do you use?

>>59812621
ubuntu us just broken i even used the nvidia xconfig utility and nothing

>>59812621
To be fair this is entirely possible because you build Arch for your system from the ground up, the time you spend installing it is the time you would spend fiddling around in another distro just getting good audio/visual settings

>>59812692
gtx 1070

>>59812721
Enable the nvidia proprietary drivers.

you have to be a special kind of tard to fuck up ubuntu

>>59812710
>you build Arch for your system from the ground up
Nope, you just install some packages.

>>59812740
I have those installed the nouevou ones don't even work in This card

>>59812865
you can try the xorg-edgers ppa, and look if there is a newer driver version there; however i'm not sure if it might break your system

>>59812929
I don't need to installed arch installed x typed "X" into the command line and it had both my monitors at full resolution out of the box sure it's a black screen but the point is it found the right settings

>>59813086
im glad something worked out for you in the end

>>59813126
And now I'm installing mate anyway

You can't edit the xorg configuration file?
And you fell for the arch meme?
And you got arch running and downgraded to Ubuntu?

What are you doing with your time.... Ffs

>>59813149
>Got arch running

Arch is a piece of cake Ubuntu usually is except when you have to use the minimal CD cause your card doesn't work with the open drivers so no live cd will even boot

>>59812710
>because you build Arch for your system
You configure it for the system rather than build.

>>59812721
Lies this is a VM
>>59812592
Low quality bait

>>59814295
>640x480
>low quality bait
No shit.

>>59814295
That was absolutely not in a vm it was just Ubuntu being goofy really

>>59813149
>downgraded to ubuntu

lol Arch sucks, pacman sucks Ubuntu is way better

i use Mint, installed Arch with Gnome 3 in a vm to see what the hype is. Total shit, why would i want to build every piece of software I want when other distros do it for me?

>>59815734
you get that :^)