Chrome virtually spies on you. Firefox tries to preach SJW propaganda

>>59790042
No

>proprietary

>>59790042
Where does firefox preach SJW propaganda in the browser?

>>59790042
>Firefox tries to preach SJW propaganda to you

Put down the pipe, pal

>>59790042
No matter the situation, the answer to that question is always no.

>>59790042
No.
An usable alternative would be welcome tough.

Chromium is my choice right now. I'm already botnetted by Google until i decide i can fully ditch GApps and therefore don't rely on bookmarks sync and switch to Irdium.

>>59790042
links -g

>>59790042
>Firefox tries to preach SJW propaganda to you
>tries
And fails. Fucking everywhere tries this shit. Thank your Jewish overlords for that.
It's a coordinated effort. Not just a few company's.
>Internet Explorer?
You mean edge.
It's m$hit, probably backdoored out the wazoo.
Everything else does it's own form of ad block, where they take ads you don't want in exchange for a smaller amount of ads they're payed to inject.
Brave?

Pale Moon

>IE
call me "Hot Topic" cause I'm all about that Edge™

Chromium with Inox patchset.

File: Undeniable evidence of tranny brainwashing tactics.png (59KB, 553x445px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 553x445px

>>59790063
>>59790068

>>59790590
But i don't use that page as a home page anon, i have my out startpage

>>59790590
It give you the option on install to not have that Anon.
You just openly admitted to botnetting yourself willingly.

>>59790590

goddamn you alt-right faggots are stupid, go back to your own board and stop trying to spread shit.

>>59790622
fugg

>>59790642
>alt-right

Did you just assume my political alignment???? You sound a bit like a nazi 2bh

>>59790688
>epic "Did you just assume my" meme
wow, original

>>59790042
>Firefox tries to preach SJW propaganda to you
I haven't seen any SJW propaganda from my firefox and I've been using it for years.

>>59790590
I literally have no clue where that page is and have never seen it before.

>>59790716
What meme are you talking about? You literally made an assumption you nerd.

File: Untitled1.png (14KB, 964x144px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 964x144px

>>59790238
this

File: app_icon_official_opacity.0.png (2MB, 3072x3072px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3072x3072px

https://vivaldi.com/?lang=en_US

Get Vivaldi.
Right now.
You can use chrome extensions, You can use DuckDuckGo as your main browser... hell its built in.
Its extremely customisable (and i dont mean colors and shapes)
You can right click on any search bar anywhere and make it searchable from main page (Youtube, PornHub, e.t.c, right from the new tab) And much more
Doesnt spy or virtue signal.
It's perfect.

Microsoft Edge doesn't have this problem

>using windows unironically

File: 64c.jpg (91KB, 532x652px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 532x652px

>>59790642
Not everyone who doesnt like to see Left Wing politics ahoved down their throats is a Neo Nazi. Some are centrists or people who just dont want to hear politics all the fucking time

>>59790042
I don't see why people don't just use icecat
It's literally all the good parts of firefox without any of the negatives

File: 1491505816163.jpg (188KB, 969x1024px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 969x1024px

We need to create a new generation of rabidly xenophobic, tinfoil hat tier anti-surveillance focused opensource software

>>59790642
Yes, I am alt-right for not enjoying mass brainwashing

>>59790985
This. It's made by the original Opera devs and has nearly all the features Opera 12 had, now with a modern engine fully compatible with websites and botnet extensions. It's perfect browser for power users.

File: CashbotHD.png (77KB, 255x255px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 255x255px

>>59791003
Microsoft edge doesnt even have a working History function. It has like 4 extensions that arnt virus's and is ran by Microsoft. The second or 3rd company down the list below google on the "Possibly Skynet" list.

File: masterrace.jpg (441KB, 857x611px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 857x611px

It's literally all I use

>>59791154
Jap detected

>>59791028
I would use it in a heartbeat if said developers had the self-awareness and were tongue-in-cheek about it. (Assuming that the software is effective at what it does as well)

>>59791193
Why don't we all just do this?
We can call it the /g/ pack, and create new encryption algorithms for everything from scratch.

File: 1484757497575.jpg (8KB, 250x247px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x247px

>>59791204
>create new encryption algorithms for everything from scratch

Pffffffft, oh god, he's seriou

He thinks /g/ could invent a new encryption algorithm that wasn't garbage

But seriously, though. No. You just implement existing algorithms well (harder than it sounds) with no intentional backdoors or flaws that can be exploited.

If (1) Chrome spies on you, and (2) Chrome is free software, what stops you from ripping the Google out?

>>59791237
7.4 billion lines of code. Have fun auditing ;^)

>>59791237
I wouldn't even know where to begin to edit open source software since I'm just a filthy casual.

>>59791232
>Pffffffft, oh god, he's seriou

>He thinks /g/ could invent a new encryption algorithm that wasn't garbage

Reach for the stars kiddo

>>59791204
>/g/ takes 3 entire threads and 3 days to fizzbuzz
>/g/ takes 6 threads on the span of an entire week to sum the primes below 2 million
>Even to this day they can't beat a single whiteboard
/g/ is incompetent at anything that isn't mindless consumerism

>>59790762
did you just assume my mental capacity?

>>59790042
Edge is pretty good on the upcoming Windows update.

File: 1478388350818.png (572KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 600x580px

>>59791304
You'd probably have a better chance of reaching them than /g/ inventing a worthwhile encryption algorithm.

>>59791403
You cant even play WebM's on edge and what >>59791045 said.

>>59790042
>SJW
filtered

>>59790042
Firefox is the lesser of two evils.
But since Eich got sacked the browser keeps getting worse. I wish they stopped fucking up with the interface and addons engine.

As for chrome it keeps getting slower with every build, unless you use ugoogled chromium or something like that you may have issues. Google probably went overboard with the spyware code.

>>59790985
>closed source

>>59790590
Chrome is even worse.

>>59791310
What about we just take Servo and start from there?

>>59790042
Where is that SJW propaganda in firefox?
I can't find it anywhere...

>>59790042
use surf or lynx

>>59792995
>>59790590
Read the thread cunt

>>59790042
Yeah, being exposed to opinions you disagree with is definitely as bad as having your personal data bought and sold. I think I have PTSD from reading the New Tab page in Firefox.

>SJW propaganda
>can't stand women having equal rights
>doesn't use a browser because that
>extreme retarded retardedness

File: share-logo-ru.png (7KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 240x240px

I use Yandex.

Feels comfy.

>>59793209
Women already have equal rights you faggot. SJWs tries to degrade and insult men for being and doing manly things. They are cancer breeding feminists and faggots. They will kill human beings if allowed to be "progress". kys

There's the fact that the SJW took over the browser after they fired its creator have been making the whole project steadily worse.
Every major update almost always fucked the browser up in some new original way.
Firefox is still less awful than Chrome, but that's despite the current management of Mozilla and not because of them.

Having the idiots, who brought firefox to blink of extinction, push their drivel on the UI is just another demonstration of massive bad judgment.
It's certainly not a productive use of resources.

>>59790642
4chan is their board.

>>59793264
>Women already have equal rights you faggot.
Are you a woman working for a company ? Studies still show a pay gap.
>SJWs tries to degrade and insult men for being and doing manly things.
>SJWs tries to degrade and insult men
so tell me how fragile and insulted you feel
>doing manly things
>manly things
>manly things
fucking god how fragile and insecure can you be
>They will kill human beings if allowed to be "progress".
Now that's retardedness. Enjoy your shitty life.

>>59793209
this

They object based on their political/ideological stance.
>hypocrites at best, fighting an equal enemy
>retarded at worst, fighting a perceived imaginary enemy
99% of the time it's retarded and self fulfilling arguments that they have/use.

>>59793305
>>59793307

t. firecucks employee

>>59793301
I really hate this new meme where people think 4chan was always /pol/. It's only really repeated by people who started posting in 2012 or later. The rest of 4chan has always hated /pol/ and /new/.

>>59793321
>personal attack instead of arguments
so how's your life going

>>59793331
desu the whole internet hates /pol/ and /new/

>>59793305
studies only show a paygap when comparing ALL men in ALL fields to ALL women in ALL fields (yes this includes janitors to CEOs). This does not account for time worked. T

>>59793337
>arguing with cucks and sjws
>>59793331
you both need to gtfo to >>>/reddit/ where you belong

>>59793331
4chan has always been /pol/

>>59793351
Hello r*ddit!

>>59793346
Researchers are way less retarded than you are. They know how to account for time worked and you're finding excuses. There have been specific studies for the IT sector which showed a pay gap. Don't even start on the women rate in CEOs.
>>59793347
i have a life bye

>>59793347
>all I have to do is label the people I'm arguing with and I automatically win
Classic intellectualism from the alt-right.

>>59793351
>all I have to do is repeat the same thing over and over and it becomes true
Are you all brain-dead?

>>59793337
Yep, personal attack on two people. With a conspiracy theory of smaefagging.

>>59793321
M8, workforce is based on skills/opinions/etc... having a well rounded team is important for all businesses.
>sometimes that means women are specifically needed to round the team
>usually it's just a type of perspective and life experience that they want

You're fucking retarded if you object to that.

File: bullshit asymmetry.jpg (20KB, 600x348px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 600x348px

>engaging with /pol/tards in debate
dont do this

What about Lynx?

>>59793367
LISTEN TO YOURSELF
You are using logical fallacies to try and prop up your lies (specifically appeal to authority.). Learn to question researchers. Even researchers can bend data to suit their narrative.

The woman CEO rate is all due to personal choice. Less women want to give in the work to be a CEO and thus there are less females in the CEO positions. Are you willing to try and strip women of their free will and force them to be CEOs or are you going to strip men of their positions?

>>59793428
Just go to /pol/ or preferably shut the fuck up you fat unlikable faggot

>>59793447
really? Are you just going to call me names? Why aren't you going to argue with my points? Is it because they're breaking your narrative?

I'm not even alt right.

>>59793428
That's a rational. You're actually looking for a reason to justify something rather than explain something.

Facts remains.
>most CEOs are men
>CEOs get jobs because of who they know

New Survey Reveals 85% of All Jobs are Filled Via Networking
>https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-survey-reveals-85-all-jobs-filled-via-networking-lou-adler

Your argument is one of selective justification. Not one based on overall explanation.

>>59793463
>A-AM I B-BREAKING YOUR NARRATIVE SJW LIBTARD HUH TRIGGERED YET SNOWFLAKE GO TO INFORWARS FOR DA TROOF NOW
>b-but i'm not alt-right!
sure
whatever you say

shoo shoo

you'll fit in more on >>>/pol/

>>59793463
You are the one calling names to avoid proper arguments you retard.
>>59793428
>things are like that because I decided so
more like
>things are like that because they fit my narrative
If you think women are naturally less inclined to lead than men you're such a retard it's not even funny anymore.

>>59793428
Also. I actually got my current job by 'networking'.

My current employer also actively tries to get women to round the team off. It makes complete sense. We are far stronger as a team with the wide range of people we have.
>makes sense
>is repeated at every scale
>from shop who wants male/female till operators
>to software development house who want same wide range of people with different perspectives on life and how to solve problems

>going back to using Internet Explorer


nice bait

>>59790042
Anon they even got rid of Eich so they could spam SJW messages on the browser.
Let them have their fun.
Chrome is stealing what remains of their market share.

Old time firefox users have moved to Palemoon anyway.

>>59793007
I still don't see anything bad.

>>59793519
I haven't moved to palemoon. Why would I?

>>59793496
>If you think women are naturally less inclined to lead than men you're such a retard it's not even funny anymore.

this.

My goto person to fix shit in my job, just happens to be a woman. Is also the only person who regularly makes me go...
>'wow, I can't understand that way of doing it, but that's a far better way of doing it, teach me senpai'

That guy just has no real world experience of working with the wide variations of people that exist.

>>59793529
australis, signed addons, telemetry botnet, safe browsing lists from Google and soon a new incompatible and far less powerful addons engine

Mozilla keeps making the browser less and customizable and powerful.
But hey, at least they get to preach about social issues!

>>59793467
Indeed most CEOs are chosen because of their links to other people, just like most high level jobs. This can be used to show that less women know people in high positions. Ass kissing is one of the easiest ways to get to the best jobs. This, however, doesn't mean that people who simply know a lot of investors will keep their jobs.You still need to be good at working as a CEO.

--------------------------------------------
If the wage gap was real, then why aren't companies entirely filled up with women as companies can save fuck tonnes of money.

>>59793585
So palemoon doesn't have that? How? Is it just FF24 with security updates then?

>>59793585
>australis
agreed
>signed addons
I see you don't like security
>telemetry botnet
>>full FOSS software you can audit and modify
>>don't even need to because it's in the settings
>safe browsing lists from Google
>still didn't understand that URLs are checked locally and nothing is sent to anyone
>soon a new incompatible and far less powerful addons engine
The thing that prevented FF from having proper isolation when every single fucking decent browser on the planet has improved security tenfold since 5 years ago ?

>>59793529
Only browser that has reasonable memory usage instead of webshit/blink style retardation of process per tab

Only browser extensions like downthemall will work on post Firefox 57

Respects your gtk theme instead of trying to impose its own styling across windows Mac and Linux like Firefox does post Australis.

Current, backported security updates from Firefox

Amd64 by default on wangblows, firefuks still won't do this unless you first uninstall

Others more but I can't be arsed to bother

>>59793585
>soon a new incompatible and far less powerful addons engine
I think people who get upset about this are the type who think that extra features trump everything and don't understand the importance of good software architecture. XUL and XPCOM need to fucking die. When Apple chose KHTML instead of Gecko to build WebKit from, it was because the Gecko codebase was polluted with XPCOM.

>>59793644
>retardation of process per tab
When will you fucking understand that improving the shitty state of security in consumer software is ten times more important than saving 10 fucking megabytes of RAM ?

>>59793477
that made... barely a lick of sense

>>59793644
>Only browser that has reasonable memory usage instead of webshit/blink style retardation of process per tab
>I know nothing about operating systems, virtual memory or computer security: The post

>>59793587
>If the wage gap was real, then why aren't companies entirely filled up with women as companies can save fuck tonnes of money.

You're shifting the goalposts and argument to wage gap. Which is real in a lot of cases. NOT ALL CASES.
> a lot of cases do exist though

From the local shop who has women working for less, to the factory divided by gender roles where women get paid less because of the job role they do.

Your lack of real world work experience is showing.

Once worked for a printing factory
>women doing stitching job
>men doing printing job
>both unskilled
>if anything, the women were much more skilled
>literally had a mentally disabled person man worker
That place paid the women less than the men. The bosses were dicks and wanted workers for nothing. They treated workers like shit. I spent a few weeks there installing hardware and it was a toxic working environment.

I have seen lots of workplaces like that. Have also seen some great workplaces too.
> wagegap is a myth meme is so fucking false, it really is

>>59791014
>Racial equality is a left wing idea
European right winger here, holy shit you guys have gone off the deep end. Equality is an issue for society, not for political parties.

>>59793477
not an argument

>>59793737
not an argument

>>59793658
>Blah blah blah security blah blah I suck cocks.
Just turn of JavaScript nigga like turn it off111!!
Why the fuck am I running your shitty as code on my computer. Why do I have to run that crap wasting CPU cycles, ram, my fucking power bill to run your fucking website? Its got a fucking server, we have the fucking "cloud" so why are you running code on my damn computer?

>>59793757
>disables every single interactive thing on every single page
>literally lives in the woods
We actually could get a not-1990-tier Web with proper security if it weren't for middle-aged retards like you.

>>59793756
I was not arguing with you. I was simply pointing out your retort lacked any semblance of substance to it.
And also good job with your response,
>I'll repeat what he said, thats sure to get him.

>>59793644
Does it get improvements to the layout/JS engine?

>>59793696
>You're shifting the goalposts and argument to wage gap
yes, that's why I put it in a seperate part.
>Which is real in a lot of cases. NOT ALL CASES.
There are laws against wage inequality. Why isn't there news of many, many court cases against this?

>Once worked for a printing factory
were the men working longer hours than the women?
what company was this and is it still a company that's alive and not dissolved due to court cases against them?

>>59793756
not an argument

>>59793653
The change kills tab groups, one of the main reasons to use FF still.

File: chono slap.gif (3MB, 355x200px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 355x200px

>>59791031
>"equal education for everyone" is brainwashing

>>59793757
Now it really sounds like you don't understand computer security. JavaScript is not the only attack vector. The multi-process model is mainly a mitigation for when shellcode is running in the renderer process, and there are a number of ways that this can happen, including bad file format parsing or crashes triggered by malformed CSS and HTML.

>>59793823
Then bug Mozilla until they add a WebExtensions API for manipulating tabs. Use ESR in the meantime if you must. You're going to take a temporary hit in UI flexibility, but it's worth it to kill XUL/XPCOM.

It's always been stupid that Firefox's interface was written in XUL. It's a language that no one actually uses on the web, so Firefox's renderer has additional complexity for no reason. Now that HTML/CSS is powerful enough to build user interfaces with, Firefox should switch to that.

>>59793670
It my computer and my ram. It doesn't "belong" to some third rate website to pull in some half dozen emoji wefonts, some atrocious css , some slide show of hipsters drinking coffee all so some self important douche can jerk off about security.
>>59793791
Fwiw security is a meme, as least when it comes to rugmumchers like you. Security IRL is more than "muh sandboxing".
>>59793849
Nigga you're the one that doesn't get security. If a link is suspicious, I'd use someone else's computer, or a VM that is separate from my files. Security is a process, having threat models and shit.
I don't need sandboxing any more than I need js or some other shit when all I need is to check some documentation.
Nor for that matter, should anyone need this security crap if all their doing is watching YouTube or fagbook

>>59791268
>>59791288
Ungoogled chromium exists, you do realize that?

>>59793839
The fuck is equal education even refering to in this context? Is this even an issue in nonshithole countries?

>>59793926
Apparently, college is supposed to be just as necessary as anything up to high school.

>>59793926
Anyone who owns a computer to use firefox with doesn't really have to worry about equal education, do they?

>>59793891
>You're going to take a temporary hit in UI flexibility
Rather a radical hit in usability.
>but it's worth it to kill XUL/XPCOM.
I don't care about the API behind addons, I'm not an addon developer myself.
>It's always been stupid that Firefox's interface was written in XUL. It's a language that no one actually uses on the web, so Firefox's renderer has additional complexity for no reason. Now that HTML/CSS is powerful enough to build user interfaces with, Firefox should switch to that.
I think that the fact the interface of FF is rendered by the same engine that renders pages, with DOM and CSS and ability to control this from JS is a powerful feature.

>>59793926
>Is this even an issue in nonshithole countries?
Generally speaking not but school district gerrymandering has resulted in segregated schools in some places like America. Needless to say, the black schools don't get as much funding as the non black schools. Apparently northern states are the worst sinners on that front.

>>59793903
>It my computer and my ram. It doesn't "belong" to some third rate website
I wasn't saying it does. I just thought you sounded like the type who looks at the numbers next to processes in the task manager and concludes that the multi-process model is inefficient because Chrome's numbers add up to more that Firefox's. In reality, these numbers are almost meaningless. Pages are shared between the processes and pages from tabs you aren't using might even be swapped out. Also, memory exists to be used. If a web browser can get a performance advantage by caching things in RAM, that's good. If you need the RAM, a good program can respond to memory pressure by dropping its caches.

>If a link is suspicious, I'd use someone else's computer, or a VM that is separate from my files.
Yeah, this only works if you're the perfect arbiter of which links are """suspicious.""" Going by your posts in this thread, I'd say you're probably not. That's okay though, because no one is. Malicious code can be anywhere on the web, because of attacked sites, malicious ad networks or CDNs, or even poor user input validation allowing XSS. I don't know how you can be comfortable with the knowledge that one mistake can result in an attacker getting access to your computer at the same privilege level as your browser.

Security is a process, but you're describing a process that leans very heavily on your intuition about which websites are safe. That's not security.

>>59790590
>default page

>>59793959
>I don't care about the API behind addons, I'm not an addon developer myself.
That's shortsighted. If the API to create addons was better, more people would create addons and the existing addon developers would become more productive. Also, XPCOM pollutes the entire Firefox codebase, not just addons. It's no surprise that Firefox devs want to get rid of it. Developer satisfaction is a huge thing in open source, since you can't force people to work on code they don't like. You'd better hope XUL/XPCOM gets removed from Firefox, since if it stays, Firefox might die from stagnation instead.

>I think that the fact the interface of FF is rendered by the same engine that renders pages, with DOM and CSS and ability to control this from JS is a powerful feature.
Agreed, but XUL is retarded. Firefox would still have this strength if the interface was HTML (and I've heard Firefox devs are planning this.)

>>59793305
>you are fragile
>you are insecure
>that is retardedness
>Enjoy your shitty life
>only point being made is muh wage gap
>wage gap is a lie constructed by feminists
All you did was insult him without making a valid argument
Sounds like a feminist to me

>>59794094
>That's shortsighted. If the API to create addons was better, more people would create addons and the existing addon developers would become more productive.
Instead, the new API made it impossible for the developer of tab groups to continue. Very productive indeed.

>>59794133
The new API is never going to fit every possible use-case in the first release, but if you don't bite the bullet and switch, you'll be stuck with shit forever. Mozilla don't have the resources to maintain two extension APIs and no one wants to work on the shit one.

>>59794188
New API would be OK as long as it provided the same functionality, but apparently it doesn't.

>>59790042
>Firefox
>gnome

Someone explain me why do the SJW have to ruin everything.

>>59794248
Because they want full control

>not installing seamonkey
>aka firefox without the cancerous UI

>>59791567
You can play webm on Edge.

>>59790985
>you can use DuckDuckGo as your main browser.....
>browser
Wut?

>>59790590
Don't universities have more women than men these days?

>>59794879
It has to be VP9 encoded though, which 4chan doesn't allow.

>>59795277

My course was over 50% women. Then again it was biology related. Most of the teachers were p. decent though.

>>59793209
>Equality

It's a fucking meme that only exists on paper.

Thought you guys might like this embedded in the article are two prominent /g/ memes
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTczODk
>There's been a bug going back to early 2002 about properly integrating Mozilla with KDE
>That bug, Mozilla Bug 140751, has been open for the past twelve years
>A Phoronix reader pointed out this comment yesterday with trying to spearhead new efforts to improve the KDE + Firefox integration and getting Firefox to use KDE's Dolphin file manager.
>Justin Dolske of Mozilla was quick to remind everyone that while there's many KDE Linux users, overall the number is very small.
>Richard Newman of Mozilla also argued, "Mozilla isn't a company that's trying to win the market. It's a community that's trying to change the world.

>Richard Newman of Mozilla also argued, "Mozilla isn't a company that's trying to win the market. It's a community that's trying to change the world.

>>59793305
The wage gap IS A MYTH! ITS NOT FUCKING TRUE! THERES NO PROOF THAT IT IS! ALL THE STUDIES THAT SHOW A GAP DONT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT DIFFERENT JOBS!

File: pol.png (423KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 1600x1600px

>>59790063
>>59790068
>>59790192
>>59790590
>>59790642
>>59790688
>>59790716
>>59790751
>>59790762
>>59791031
>>59791163
>>59791391
>>59792122
>>59792995
>>59793209
>>59793264
>>59793273
>>59793305
>>59793307
>>59793321
>>59793337
>>59793346
>>59793347
>>59793367
>>59793371
>>59793375
>>59793428
>>59793447
>>59793463
>>59793467
>>59793477
>>59793496
>>59793508
>>59793519
>>59793557
>>59793666
>>59793696
>>59793696
>>59793707
>>59793737
>>59793756
>>59793839
>>59793926
>>59793949
>>59793950
>>59794017
>>59794109
>>59794248
>>59795277
>>59795989
>>59796004
>>59796723

>>>/pol/

>Firefox tries to preach SJW propaganda to you
what?

>>59793707
How is pushing for everyone to get a free education at all related to racial equality? Are you saying that all racial minorities cant afford an education? Wow thats racist, you ass backwards Europeans sure have gone off the deep end.

File: Pale_Moon_Icon.png (67KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 256x256px

>anything but

ungoogled chromium doesnt have this problem :^)

>>59790985
>https://vivaldi.com/?lang=en_US
>Get Vivaldi.
>Right now.
>You can use chrome extensions, You can use DuckDuckGo as your main browser... hell its built in.
>Its extremely customisable (and i dont mean colors and shapes)
>You can right click on any search bar anywhere and make it searchable from main page (Youtube, PornHub, e.t.c, right from the new tab) And much more
>Doesnt spy or virtue signal.
>It's perfect.
Browser that is closed source is worthless. Doesnt spy, my ass.

>>59796935
Get out faggot

File: 788cfc7b3003be2153cbf3c862b3af6c9805bbac3886ecb782fa6aec972837e4_1-1.jpg (238KB, 800x522px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 800x522px

>>59796935
Faggots like you should be banned on sight

>>59790042
>giving your personal data to corporations because words offend you
#JustMicroshillThings

>>59790590
Do you actually have an argument against what she says, other than "hurr durr sjw?"

>>59790688
>Did you just assume my political alignment???? You sound a bit like a nazi 2bh
You think THAT is what made the Nazis bad? Not the systematic genocide, not the invading peaceful European countries, not the suppression of individual freedoms?

>>59790688
I lold

>>59791237
Chrome isn't free software.

>>59793264
>Women already have equal rights you faggot
Not in places where they're denied equal access to education. That is LITERALLY all the "Firefox SJW" screenshots in this thread are advocating.

>>59793347
>>59793359
Please refrain from using the r-word in the future. Thank you.

>>59793428
>The woman CEO rate is all due to personal choice. Less women want to give in the work to be a CEO and thus there are less females in the CEO positions. Are you willing to try and strip women of their free will and force them to be CEOs or are you going to strip men of their positions?
Free will, as an absolute determinant of human behavior, is a myth. Everything we do is influenced by our upbringing and the culture we live in. And if you're going to use the "personal choice" meme to argue that women being underrepresented as CEOs isn't a problem, then you'll ALSO have to agree that men dying on the job isn't a problem either, because men made the PERSONAL CHOICE to work on those dangerous jobs. Sure, they only took on those jobs because that's the only way they could make enough money to survive, but it's still their personal choice and trying to change things means you're denying their agency which makes you literally worse than Hitler.

>>59793587
>If the wage gap was real, then why aren't companies entirely filled up with women as companies can save fuck tonnes of money.
The whole reason some employers pay women less in the first place is because they think women are less productive workers than men. They set wages in proportion to the perceived productivity of workers. So from their perspective, hiring women wouldn't actually be saving money, they'd just be having more employees, but the total wages paid, and total productivity, would be about the same.

>>59793926
>shithole countries don't count

>>59793949
In modern western countries at least, it basically is.

>>59795277
Depends on the field desu.

>>59796004
Absolute, true equality can never exist 100%, but that doesn't mean we should make no effort to move in that direction. It's equivalent to saying "well, if some diseases are incurable, what's the point of having doctors?".

>>59797004
>people who acknowledge that racism still exists are the real racists guys!

>>59797577
Yeah. It's really gay and faggots like you want to defend such bullshit.

>>59790042
IE is on life support because south korea still requires to use it.

>>59797829
>but that doesn't mean we should make no effort to move in that direction.

Absolutely retarded. There's a reason why competent female cops and security tend to be dykes.

>>59793919

But maybe I want to try and become a leet haxor as a hobby lad