After the last updates... can we finally say that Vivaldi

the last update was a bug fix. why a bug fix makes it suddenly /outbrowser/?

>>59765804
Updates

>>59765795
No.

It's still slower, inferior, and more bloated than the standards /g/ should be upholding.

It's not fully open-source. 600mb of source files is not solely source code, they are binary blobs.

>>59765795
>Not using Comfy Iridium with Widevine

>still inferior to chromium in every single way
>still aesthetically unpleasant & poorly designed

>>59765795
Did they open source it?

>>59765910
>Widevine
useless

Still waiting on inclusion of a mail client before I uninstall Opera 12.xx
Also, custom context menus

>>59765795
Vivaldi is pretty nice except for the fact that it's a closed source botnet. I mean, it starts up very quickly, and the UI is pretty nice, I would use it if I could trust it.

>>59765795
I fucking love it

>>59765817
>You bought in to the botnet because muh rendering speed
?

>>59766775
>It starts up very quickly
I used it for months and can tell you that is not the case at all.

>>59766929
Yes it is, starts up a lot quicker than chromium (slowest) and firefox.

>>59766958
It really doesn't. Firerfox, I found, to be slowest, followed very closely by Memevaldi. Chrome is blistering when it comes to opening.

>>59767130
On Ubuntu Vivaldi starts up almost instantly (cold), Firefox takes a few seconds (granted I run it in a firejail) and Chromium takes longer than any of them. Perhaps you're using windows?

If I was going to use a chromium alternative, it would be Brave not this closed cancer shit.

>>59767204
Yeah, I'm not autistic and like to use my computer for things.

>>59767284
>Yeah I'm an adult who likes to play videogaymes

No need to be ashamed anon.

>>59767845
>implying I'm an adult

>>59767999
Even worse

>>59767999
>implying being underage

Opinion disregarded.

I'm using Vivaldi right now, I find it pretty comfy, but since it's just a chromium skin, there is little possibility it'll ever get faster then chromium in boot times. The customisation is nice though, and I like to have my tabs at the right side instead of at the top, which chrome wouldn't let me do back when I still used that botnet.

File: 71mIAfYp6cL._SL1500_.jpg (59KB, 1219x1500px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1219x1500px

>>59765795
Well since /g/ consists of traps and the logo kinda looks like pic related, I guess it could be true.

>>59768207
>implying that I'm underage when the rules clearly state that no one under 18 can access this site.

File: -font-b-Prostate-b-font-font-b-Massager-b-font-U-shape-font-b-Aneros.jpg (129KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 800x800px

>>59768318
actually more like

>>59768338
>Implying I'm implying what you're implying.

>>59768358
>All these implications being implied
wew

File: orig.png (19KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 256x256px

>>59765795
stop playing with toys anon.
just use Yandex, its the best browser you can get.

>>59768426
>putinnet
>ever

File: 1489840184301.jpg (4MB, 3231x2980px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3231x2980px

>>59768452
your loss my friend.
>best mail service and best browsing experience.

>>59768503
I'll happily take it Vladimir

>>59765795
No. It will never be /ourbrowser/ by definition of a data miner.

Who /palemoon/ here?

I've always wondered if /g/ ever written anything before and if it was any good. So many people are so critical of software that I wonder what stops them from making a browser/text editor/distro/ whatever that's actually good.

>>59768932
You don't have to be a chef to know something tastes like shit lad.