[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

When is Nvidia planning on fixing their awful DX12 drivers?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 32
Thread images: 5

File: 1491163475070.png (953KB, 1122x622px) Image search: [Google]
1491163475070.png
953KB, 1122x622px
When is Nvidia planning on fixing their awful DX12 drivers?
I mean how the fuck can your driver leave your single GPU solution sitting on its ass at half utilization?
>>
>>59733016
Nobody will ever adopt DX12, they already have vulkan support.
>>
>>59733025
This. DX12 is a failure. Move along..
>>
File: 3pracb.jpg (24KB, 471x308px) Image search: [Google]
3pracb.jpg
24KB, 471x308px
>>
File: Screenshot_20170404_125254.png (233KB, 1730x945px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20170404_125254.png
233KB, 1730x945px
>>59733025
Don't be dumb, it's even worse that over half of these titles are used in benchmarks.
>>
>>59733025
Do they not have the same problem in Vulkan..? It seems they do.

>>59733016
They haven't improved it now, years after DX12 was introduced. So maybe never.

They're probably waiting for DX12 and Vulkan to be adopted more before they suddenly come out with a new architecture that uses a hardware scheduler again.
This is exactly why they never opened up DX12 support on Fermi: It would have outperformed Keplar and other newer cards in DX12.

Instead they've focused on stifling adoption of it with games they partner on. Look at BF1, a console port pretty. It runs shit on DX12 for AMD like no game does. It's an intentionally crippled rendering pipeline that doesn't make use of DX12 on PC like it does on the psuedo-DX12 on consoles.
>>
>>59733016
It saves power, it's a feature!
>>
>>59733048
I knew there were at least a dozen DX12 games, but it's surprising to see how many are DX12 only. I didn't know that was a thing.
That's sad. I really don't want Windows 10. I was hoping to mostly use Vulkan on Linux.

I guess the only DX12 exclusive game I want to play there is Forza, at least.
>>
>>59733016
Stupid goy. DX12 is a meme and DX11 will reign supreme forever. Delete this thread. Now.
>>
>>59733048
The only one that really uses any of it is ashes of the singularity. Others are little more than dx11 code in a dx12 wrapper for marketing reasons.

DX12 will probably die but it could still go either way if something unexpected happens.
>>
>>59733016
DX12 works on Nvidia fine, you just need to do a lot more work.
You need to do manual memory management and threading manually.
And as obvious, even with Nvidiabux that's a shitload of lowlevel work nobody will do.
>>
>>59733095
Hard to explain that to people, but benchmarks nowadays have Tomb Raider, Civ, Sniper, Deus Ex, Hitman, Warhammer, etc, all running either DX11 tests, DX12 or both, needles to say the latter makes everything look like shit.
>>
>>59733095
> Others are little more than dx11 code in a dx12 wrapper for marketing reasons.
Not true for all of them.
It's true for BF1.

The Divisions DX12 is pretty good, for example. Rise of the Tomb Raider, though it has horrible optimization elsewhere.
>>
>>59733016
Rise of the Tomb Raider is a GAMEWORKS game.

What the fucking shit is Nvidia thinking?
>>
>>59733016
All DX12 titles should come with a "If you're using a Nvidia graphic adapter, use DX11" or just simply refuse to run on Nvidia, why would anyone chose a worse experience?
>>
ITT:Nvidiots buyers remorse
>>
>>59733152
because windows is for gaymen and to doubt DX12 will survive is to doubt windows will survive.
>>
>>59733025
But nVidia's Vulkan support is even worse than their DX12 support.
>>
>>59733144
79 fps is ENOUGH
It's saving power. Very energy efficient.
>>
>>59733184
That can't be right
>>
>>59733016
It has to do with nvidia's scheduler vs amd's. Nvidia can't really into DX12. On the other hand nvidia's DX11 is much better than AMD's on lower end CPUs
>>
It's going to be nice having absolutely no excuse not to buy a full AMD build.
>>
File: kekarotto.gif (438KB, 239x200px) Image search: [Google]
kekarotto.gif
438KB, 239x200px
>tfw nvididiots roasted me for getting a 480 all those months ago
Oh look how the tables have turned
>>
>>59734712
Right?
Poor Volta.
>>
Just switch to dx11 mode. I don't see the problem here. Just as with amd and their inferior dx11 performance you'd play in dx12 mode to compensate. Just do the opposite with Nvidia. Simple.
>>
File: 1268453211722.jpg (30KB, 298x403px) Image search: [Google]
1268453211722.jpg
30KB, 298x403px
>play game coded by the most incompetent AAA developer currently known, which makes Ubisoft look good in comparison
>whine that Nvidia or AMD are at fault for the game behaving in a retarded manner with hardware

OP, your retardation has no bounds.
Of all the fucking games, you used Bethesda shit as a tool to attack a hardware manufacturer.

The way to fix your problem is simple: Ask the mod community for Bethesda games. All fixes come from them anyway.
>>
>>59734966
It happens in all DX12 games on Nvidia, fucktard.
>>
Nvidia's shitty DX12 API (or hardware) is what's causing many of the bad benchmarks of Ryzen (or at the very least compounds the issue). Most of the reviewers are testing with 1080/1080Ti/Titan XP's. This means any DX12 results are not really valid to Ryzens performance in games.
>>
AYYMD RYPOO HOUSEFIRES IS GARBAGE

NVIDIA DOESN'T NEED TO FIX ANYTHING, IT RUNS PERFECTLY FINE ON SUPER INTEL CPUS
>>
>>59736160
You are roasted ?
>>
>>59733048
How old is this picture now?
>>
>>59733016
They can't. The cards themselves have lacking hardware for DX12 and Vulkan so they actually need to do all those async magics via software emulation which to layman looks like "awful drivers"
Thread posts: 32
Thread images: 5


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.