Will you still pirate shit and browse your favorite preggo loli

>>59696866
No because I'm a law abiding citizen not a degenerate.

File: 1485908708636.gif (2MB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x375px

>>59696866
>Less regulation is bad
Underage millennials and gen y liberals should be purged.

>>59696866
>>>59693703

File: 1488590849511.jpg (24KB, 506x556px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 506x556px

>>59696900
>being a law abiding citizen not a degenerate.

>>59696911
Your right nothing bad ever happens in highly unregulated markets

>>59696866
Of course.

>>59696866
Lolimarathon.cf is no longer up so I see no reason to try anymore

Stop falling for fake news.

All it did was abort a regulation that wasn't even planned to go into effect until next year. In other words, your "internet privacy" is exactly the same as it's been since you were old enough to shitpost.

>>59697330
This. It's literally nothing and these people on tv who don't know this shit are just spouting nonsense. Why didn't they care about the vault 7 leak by Wikileaks showing how the U.S used foreign malware to attack targets? Or the Snowden revelations?

File: 1489936004541.png (3MB, 1500x2085px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1500x2085px

>>59696866

Publishers often refer to copying they don't approve of as “piracy.” In this way, they imply that it is ethically equivalent to attacking ships on the high seas, kidnapping and murdering the people on them. Based on such propaganda, they have procured laws in most of the world to forbid copying in most (or sometimes all) circumstances. (They are still pressuring to make these prohibitions more complete.)

If you don't believe that copying not approved by the publisher is just like kidnapping and murder, you might prefer not to use the word “piracy” to describe it. Neutral terms such as “unauthorized copying” (or “prohibited copying” for the situation where it is illegal) are available for use instead. Some of us might even prefer to use a positive term such as “sharing information with your neighbor.”

>>59697826
In the future please just link to the gnu.org/philosophy page you copied that from so my filter takes care of you.

>>59697040
He didn't say a totally free market you fucking moron. Just much less regulated than today's market.

>>59696924
Moemoe

>>59696866
Yes because I live in Minnesota

>>59696866
>pirate
No such thing

>>59696866
Yes because i don't live in the land of data caps and going to jail for using a torrent client.

>>59696866
You aren't making any sense. ISPs already had all your browsing info beforehand. The only thing that has changed is now they could sell that info if they wanted. Your privacy is exactly the same still.

>>59699015
wrong, there is literally no change, selling your data has always been legal.

>>59696866
>not using a VPN for porn already

>>59697067
there is a torrent of it
pastebin.com/eWcq9UE9
it contains more stuff, the lolimarathon is inside /4chan lolimarathon 23gb

I live in the balkans though?

>>59697842
nah, fuck your filter

File: Screenshot_20170402-081115.jpg (400KB, 1425x2468px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 1425x2468px

>>59696866
>he doesn't install the Pornhub app on an encrypted, sandboxed secure folder powered by Samsung Knox (tm)
fucking normies lmao

File: 1487165267509.jpg (10KB, 293x282px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 293x282px

>>59702243
>Samsung Know
>Implying it is not backdoored

>>59697842
>Wahhh somebody said things I don't like
>Waaaahhhh he should be silenced so I can continue to be intoxicated by only listening to things I want to hear.
Grow the fuck up kid. Filters are for tumblr users.

>>59702243
This is a weak troll. You would have been better off by claiming that Incognito mode would protect you.

File: 1479767524216s.jpg (4KB, 208x206px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 208x206px

>>59702243

File: Indian Poolean.jpg (28KB, 152x214px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 152x214px

>>59702554

>>59702243
is there actually an open source sandboxing app for android?

>>59702773
Not for consumers. There are a couple enterprise options out there, but they're pretty strict when it comes to licensing and have a bunch of prerequisites you have to fill before you can even apply. I can say there *might* *possibly* be something in the works similar to what you're talking about, and it'll definitely capture the attention of privacy enthusiasts.

Let's let our dicks hang out for a sec and pretend there's a little breathing room in any NDAs I may or may not have-- there *may* already be a roadmap laid out, and you *might* see something in late '18 related to interesting little boxes of inception and obfuscation, and once you peel the banana you become master of the universe. :^)

>>59702464
Filters are wonderful, why would I ant to see the same generic posts spammed day after day?