[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What are the most needed addons for the TOR browser? I have ghostery,

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 128
Thread images: 15

File: Tor.jpg (191KB, 1494x1014px) Image search: [Google]
Tor.jpg
191KB, 1494x1014px
What are the most needed addons for the TOR browser? I have ghostery, but don't know what else I should be using for convenience or security purposes.
>>
>>59670804
ghostery sells data, do not use
also don't install random addons, they can leak data
>>
>>59670804
You shouldn't use add ons in the Tor browser you fucking retard.
>>
>>59670804
>What are the most needed addons for the TOR browser?
None. Tor was meant to be used as-is, without any potentially risky additions.
>>
>>59670804
I like that one Stylish addon with themes and usually soke gamebaddons because there are gardlybany games on tor
>>
>>59670804
Google Translate extension for those situations when you visit russian arm smuggling marketplaces.
>>
>>59670852
It's not that the additions are risky, it's just that it gets reported to websites what add ons are installed. You want to blend in with other Tor users, not stick out by being the only retard to use some retarded add on.
>>
This is bait
>>
>>59670893
Exactly.
>>
>>59670893
block all javascript so they can't detect your addons, problem solved
>>
File: Untitled.png (74KB, 1002x686px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
74KB, 1002x686px
>>59670804
uBlock Origin and uMatrix. Remove NoScript and HTTPS Everywhere, they're useless.
>>
Do you guys run Tor on your base system or in a VM?
>>
>>59672584
Host ofcourse, why would you run it in a VM?
>>
>>59672805
Keep it contained.
>>
>>59671823
And now you stand out as a user who disables javascript.

Which honestly isn't particularly meaningful, but using ghostery on the tor browser makes you retarded
>>
>>59670804
8/8
>>
File: images-2.jpg (11KB, 208x243px) Image search: [Google]
images-2.jpg
11KB, 208x243px
>>59672154
Yes goy and don't use tor, incognito mode will work just as well.
>>
>>59673464
>stand out cause you block javascript
yeah nah, some sites sites will just think you're one of the billions of crawlers/bots that request info and maybe have you input a captcha, that's all
>>
>>59670804
First of all
>Don't use TOR
It has been compromised a long time ago
Get i2p nigga
>>
>>59670829
It only sells data if you say yes to all those questions when you set it up. You're right about not installing random addons. It just increases the attack surface.
>>
>>59672154
Literally never listen to Femanon. If she's not from a three letter agency she's just off the scale retarded.
>>
>>59673581
You may want to read the complete post before responding.
>>
>>59673464
I thought tor now blocks javascript by default. The creators even recommended blocking javascript because it's really easy to use that to identity users.
>>
>>59673648
WTF, lol
>>
>>59673663
yeah nah, the correction stands
>>
>>59673597
>doesn't know it is Tor not TOR
>calls it compromised without providing a source

You seem educated on the matter.
>>
>>59673542
What? I said you don't need NoScript which is inferior to uMatrix and HTTPS everywhere is redundant these days.
>>
>>59673665
Yes JavaScript is blocked by default because it's dangerous as fug, Java drivebys by RuneScape baiters can put a rat on your PC so just imagine what the CIA or NSA are capable of
>>
>>59673732
It might be. There was the recent case where the FBI dropped a ton of child pornography charges in order to keep however they found these people a secret.
>>
Are people literally retarded?
What the fuck, /g/.
>>
>>59673839
doubt.jpg
>>
>>59670804
>not using a VPN service to connect to your VPS running OpenVPN to connect to the real server you flew to Russia and hid in a utility box that's stealing wifi from the surrounding area and then connecting to tor
>2017
>>
File: Kitchen-design-ideas-20.jpg (4MB, 4214x2730px) Image search: [Google]
Kitchen-design-ideas-20.jpg
4MB, 4214x2730px
>>59673754
>>
>>59673839
the way they can get you through tor is by profiling your browsing habits

if you visit the same three onion sites every time you login they are going to have a good idea who you are if they want to perform a heuristics analysis on the exit nodes they run
>>
>>59673914
>he doesn't bounce his internet off the moon
>>
>>59673859
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/03/doj-drops-case-against-child-porn-suspect-rather-than-disclose-fbi-hack/

Decide for yourself.
>>
>>59670878
>Protecting your privacy
>Google
pick one
>>
>>59674012
thatsthejoke
>>
File: watdafuk.gif (982KB, 450x258px) Image search: [Google]
watdafuk.gif
982KB, 450x258px
>>59672154
Have fun being uniquely identifiable. You even mentioned you solely use Russian nodes for entry and exit. You couldn't make it easier for anyone to solely identify your traffic. lolz
>>
>>59672154
you are one of like 3 people in the world with that browser fingerprint

while you're at it you might as well set your window size to something retarded like 1337 x 1337 pixels so they'll pick you out for sure
>>
>>59673965
That looks niiice (:

>>59674123
>You even mentioned you solely use Russian nodes
I doubt. I even showed my torrc config. I clearly don't "solely use Russian nodes".

>>59674141
I know fons and plugins affect your fingrprint, not extensions. Window size is usually 1280x1410, as that's the size when I dock it on side.
>>
File: girls_laughing.jpg (43KB, 600x363px) Image search: [Google]
girls_laughing.jpg
43KB, 600x363px
>>59674218
>Window size is usually 1280x1410, as that's the size when I dock it on side
>>
>>59673965
needs moar open shelving
>>
File: Untitled.png (322KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
322KB, 2560x1440px
>>59674231
??
>>
>>59674301
when will you post a pic of your hand?
>>
>>59674301
Why do you even use Tor? You're as unique as you can be.
>>
>>59674301
NEVER
NEVER
NEVER

resize the default tor browser window

even on the hardened tor browser
>>
>>59674301
>using tor
>swapping out the default extensions
>resizing the window
>visiting non-onion sites

jesus christ just kill yourself already
>>
File: 1314933401346.gif (178KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]
1314933401346.gif
178KB, 480x480px
>>59674218
>>59674301
Oh yeah, I should have said solely Russian and Ukrainian nodes.

You suffer from Dunning-Kruger effect. You're either a troll or a complete moron. I think the latter.

>>59674355
This^

Femanon goes against all the advice of the Tor developers themselves regarding usage.
>>
>>59674029
With all those /v/-tards around you cant be sure anymore these days
>>
File: Untitled.png (13KB, 1002x1086px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
13KB, 1002x1086px
>>59674330
No one (three letter entity) has any interest of following me throughout Tor network. But no site owner could associate my Tor session with my regular one. I don't need more than that.

>>59674355
Well, sucks. I'm not going to browse on this. It's too narrow.

>>59674370
Ahahahah, no

>>59674371
Right.. I don't see you following me anytime soon..
>>
>>59674408
>No one (three letter entity) has any interest of following me throughout Tor network. But no site owner could associate my Tor session with my regular one. I don't need more than that.

what you need is a shared VPN

DO NOT VISIT NON-ONION SITES WITH TOR

FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME

EXIT NODES WILL SNIFF YOUR PLAINTEXT DATA
>>
File: game_over.jpg (29KB, 400x267px) Image search: [Google]
game_over.jpg
29KB, 400x267px
>>59674408
>Right.. I don't see you following me anytime soon..

This is irrelevant and also not an argument. You go against the warnings of the tor developers themselves. Little knowledge and lots of arrogance = Femanon.
>>
>>59674440
Idk, I've been using it for years. I do have OpenVPN set up too though. I still need two (or more) different identities at once. Tor is able to do that.
>>
>>59670838
Why?
>>
>>59674464
>go to onion site
>oh this is the only user blocking this specific piece of script/IP
>oh this is the only user not blocking this specific piece of script/IP
>>
>>59674462
>I've been doing something stupid for years so that makes it OK
>>
>>59672154
>>59673679
>>59673754
>>59674301
>>59674408
Wow. Femanon once again proved to be the most retarded anon /g/ has ever known. The sad thing is she could have been on the same level as everyone else right now if she would have actually listened to the advise she got here in stead of attentionwhoring and trying to safe face as a namefig.
>>
>>59674505
Experience beats theory.
>>
File: laawdy.jpg (924KB, 5000x5000px) Image search: [Google]
laawdy.jpg
924KB, 5000x5000px
>>59674526
>Experience beats theory.

omfg how fucking delusional. i believe you are a woman now.
>>
>>59673966
What if you use a VPN?
>>
>>59674218
No, I clearly remember you saying you only use russion nodes. You're a fucking retard one likes you here.
>>
>>59674915
that question doesn't have enough information

if we're talking vpns we've entered an entirely different realm of possibilities
>>
>>59674526
>anecdotal evidence beats empirical evidence
>>
>>59674970
no one*
>>
>>59674978
If I use a VPN and then connect to Tor is it safer then just connecting directly?
>>
>>59674970
You remember wrong. See >>59674301

>>59674983
I think you don't understand those words very well.
>>
>>59675080
in 99% of scenarios this method is less secure than just using tor directly

but it ultimately depends on your threat model
>>
>>59675211
How?
>>
File: retarded.jpg (28KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]
retarded.jpg
28KB, 500x375px
>>59675162
>>
>>59675245
Because it has to be assumed from a cogent security model that the VPN server is logging your activity
>>
Can I browse Tor while logged on my google account?
>>
File: 1472391333650.gif (891KB, 700x478px) Image search: [Google]
1472391333650.gif
891KB, 700x478px
>>59675258
Great. now back to the subreddit you crawled from.
>>
File: 34336667.jpg (46KB, 900x504px) Image search: [Google]
34336667.jpg
46KB, 900x504px
Use Riffle

http://news.softpedia.com/news/riffle-our-anonymity-network-is-better-than-tor-says-mit-506231.shtml
>>
>>59675355
Yes, but why would you do that? Google is the master botnet.
>>
>>59675342
I see but some genuinely don't keep logs.
>>
>>59675375
To upload videos on my youtube channel
>>
>>59674355
What If I globally block all scripts?
>>
>>59675400
>I see but some genuinely don't keep logs.
>genuinely

there is no way for you to know that

this is what happened to hidemyass

they claimed they didn't log anything, government came a-knockin' and WOOPS! it turns out they did keep logs of everything.
>>
>>59675409
And why would you do that? Tor even configured in a way to make it faster is still slow.
>>
>>59675452
Screens resolution can be determined even without JS. If you care enough, don't resize it.
>>
>>59675359
how does it make you feel to know that you're this retarded?
>>
>>59675452
You have to be trolling at this point

The reason to use the default plugins is because it does not allow you to be individually fingerprinted among all of the other Tor users

changing which scripts you block and don't block by fucking with the default plugins just singles you out from the crowd

All of this stuff is literally on the tor website, I don't know why you keep bothering us with it.
>>
>>59675457
Here's what I don't get: if a VPN claims to not keep logs, what benefit is it to them to lie and actually keep the logs? What am I missing?
>>
>>59675805
Because they can sell it. Are you asking why someone would want easy money?
>>
>>59675805
One reasonable answer is incompetence. Another is that the VPN might be a honeypot. Or they are trying to profit off the data. Who knows. All I know is that it has happened in the past and it's very likely happening right now.
>>
>>59675840
>>59675861
>profiting off the data

How much could they possibly make from this? Google, Microsoft, etc. could make a shit load because they have many millions or even a billion users. How many does a medium sized VPN have? Thousands, if that? Is it worth risking your business over it? I don't think so.
>>
>>59675939
Jesus you are insufferable

Who knows

That's the fucking answer right there

Can you vet it? No. OK, it has to be considered insecure from a security protocol.

It's likely they aren't trying to profit from it directly right now. It could just be a honeypot. Maybe they will use it for an exit scam. Maybe they will use it to blackmail their users.

I don't fucking know because I'm not a diabolical asshole selling user data on the darknet

But I know that type of data is there so SOMEONE is doing it. I also know other highly touted VPNs have been caught storing user data and logs. It only makes sense that others are doing it as well.
>>
>>59672805
>>59673679
>>59673754
>>59674218
>>59674301
>>59674408
>>59674462
>>59674526
>>59675162
>>59675359
>>59675375
>>59675459
>>59675475

I'm not sure why anyone would take advice on my being anonymous by someone who goes out of their way to not be anonymous and a Vietnamese sewing board.
>>
>>59675457
I read that PIA were confronted and they couldn't give over anything because they didn't store anything.

Its true what you said though.

I always thought it would be harder for a hacker or something to get your IP if you have a VPN.
>>
>>59676204
>I read that
You sure did
>>
>>59676204
"hacker" is such a useless term. the question is WHO is hacking you and HOW MUCH MONEY do they have?

All of these security measures have pros and cons depending on your threat vector

Tor falls under the "I will be locked up by the government" vector so anything that you put between you and Tor is an additional risk

If your goal is to avoid website tracking then a vpn might be a suitable compromise

If you don't trust your ISP then the question comes down to: do I trust my VPN MORE than my ISP?

If you are trying obfuscate activity on the clearnet then you have to assume that your VPN is safe and use a shared IP pool for plausible deniability

if you are using tor you have to worry about the exit nodes parsing your data

you can run tor->VPN but in that case your VPN is still the weak link

You can run your own VPN on a VPS host but then the question comes down to...do you trust your VPS host?

there's not a one-size fits all answer
>>
>>59670804
>based on firecucks
you should just google chrome with vidalia, at least you haven't a shitty browser. :^)
>>
>>59676343
>google chrome
>tor
>>
>>59673464
> And now you stand out as a user who disables javascript.

please educate yourself before posting your garbage
>>
>>59676328
>do I trust my VPN MORE than my ISP?

I don't see why anybody wouldn't, seeing as how you can't trust your ISP at all. They log everything and never tell you otherwise.

>>59676036
Oh, so you don't have any idea what you're talking about. Got it.
>>
>>59676231
https://torrentfreak.com/vpn-providers-no-logging-claims-tested-in-fbi-case-160312/

>>59676328
I do trust my VPN more then my ISP. Comcast fucking sucks.
>>
>>59676620
>But still, the big question remains: how can a prospective customer be sure that their VPN provider really keeps no logs? In reality the answer to that question is largely a matter of trust, weighed up against the goodwill the company has built up over its time in business.
>>
>>59676620
>(((tested))) FBI case
Yes goy, it's totally safe, see? Even the FBI can't get to them, haha!
>>
>>59676620
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeypot_(computing)
>>
File: fbi monitoring.jpg (284KB, 1756x1317px) Image search: [Google]
fbi monitoring.jpg
284KB, 1756x1317px
I can't remember the VPN now but there was a story a while ago of a well known VPN that had absolutely no logging as per their contract. However, one of their users was found to be stalking and harassing a young woman after she complained to the police and they went to the VPN provider. They didn't turn over logs, but, they did set up a real-time trace to get the guy in action.

Moral of the story? They may not 'log' anything, but that doesn't stop them from tracing users upon request.
>>
>>59674141
wrong. Full screen is fine.
>>
>>59673966
They do that for any browser.
>>
>>59674370
What do you mean by onion sites? Would xvideos count?
>>
>>59674408
So how do i know the proper size for the tor browser?
>>
>>59676140
Learn to proof read your sentences you stupid cia nigger.
>>
>>59675375
Can you have chrome open as a browser, and also TOR used as a browser at the same time? But only do my porn on TOR
>>
>>59675364
Fuck off shill.
>>
>>59677499
try make and me faggot
>>
>>59676328
Are you saying that it is SAFER to use a browser that isnt TOR for any sort of activity? If I wanted to watch porn and not have my stuff logged, TOR would be a bad idea?
>>
>>59676343
What?
>>
>>59677626
my trips already did that you silly nigger cattle, keep re-rolling and getting rek'd.
>>
>>59677578
I don't see why not. Chrom* does not have the permission to see what FireFox/Tor is doing

>>59677439
Close and open Tor again, should open with its optimal size. If you mistakenly click the window edges consider the window resized.
>>
>>59676659
But I am 100% sure that my ISP does keep logs, and will give them up if asked. I also know that soon they're gonna be selling internet history.
>>
Femanon giving more bad advice

https://www.whonix.org/wiki/DoNot#Do_not_use_clearnet_and_Tor_at_the_same_time.
>>
>>59670804
are you retarded or what
think for a minute about why tor opens up at a certain resolution/size and only has preconfigured noscript installed
>>
>>59678179
It says to not access the same site. Eh, I've been doing this without any issues
>>
Anyone use riffles?
>>
>>59672154
you're truly fucking retarded, aren't you...
>>
>>59674301
>windows
wew lad
>>
>>59679149
fuck you
>>
I would never touch Tor again but;
Exclude all five eyes exit nodes (USA, UK, NZ, AUS, CAN)
Exclude the rest of the 14 eyes countries (optional)
Use the strictest Tor settings which disable Javascript
and don't touch the add-ons you tard
>>
>>59681490
do u have a vid for this?
>>
How do I get Tor to open webms? Sorry if the solution is obvious, I'm new or whatever.
>>
>>59681490
>Exclude all five eyes exit nodes
How?
>>
>>59670804
All you do is to set NoScript to block all scripts by default.
Don't even change the browser window size.
>>
>>59670829
What's the best alternative to Ghostery that does the same thing but doesn't have all its worrysone controversies?
>>
>>59685802
Is there a video for this?
Thread posts: 128
Thread images: 15


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.