how can we be real if we cant perform ((∞ + 1))??
>tfw cia limiting our maths
>>59639245
Infinity is not a number.
You would've known that if you took a non-meme major, and learned at least some Analysis I, you fucking CS monkey.
>>59639245
How can Maths be real if our eyes aren't real?
>>59639309
/thread.
>>59639245
you can perform (∞ +1),(∞ +2) yada yada but it will be a new sequence by your own axiom (yes u heard me right buddy, create your own fucking axiom because it fucking allowed) but before doing that assign a number say β instead of ∞ as the right limit of the first sequence so the next sequence becomes β+1,β+2.....
>>59639245
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrU9YDoXE88
>>59639245
∞ + 1 = ∞
>>59639309
You don't need to take ANY major to know this. I'm a translation college dropout and stole OP's CS monkey job.
Literally no debt required to make a decent living btw.
>>59639245
∞ is not real, so the fact we can't cant perform (∞ + 1) actually proves we are real.
>>59639245
How can we be real if we can't perform (( hamburger + 1))?
Oh, that doesn't count? Is that because hamburgers aren't numbers?
Well neither is infinity.
>>59639309
>>59641947
Fucking javascript
>>59643038
∞ / 0