So tomorrow when all of your Internet privacy is 100% gone, what

>>59631484
explain?

>>59631510
lol

>>59631510
our government sold us out

>>59631484
>tomorrow
Are you libtards retarded or something? You think that the NSA is just getting ready to start data collection now?

>>59631808
Now it will be open knowledge. They will know you watch porn on xvideos and send them to your parents. Watch out kid.

>>59631510
jews

also if you havent encrypted all your shit already you deserve it

File: 1486525091328.jpg (51KB, 699x699px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 699x699px

>>59631484
Today they were selling your data. Yesterday they were selling your data. Tomorrow they will be selling your data.

>>59631484
>land of the free

>>59631814
>now
This has been happening since Obama took office retard.

>>59631783
MAGE AMERIGA GREAD AGEN :D

>>59631484
Why do you assume everyone lives in the USA? Not everyone is a burgertard, my data goes nowhere near America ISPs.

>>59631484
>what will the NSA find when they look at your IP?
For over a decade I've assumed everything I access directly is logged and likely to be leaked to the public with by real name attached, so nothing compromising. The one exception is very vanilla porn that I deliberately download every couple of days with an automated browser. (Good thing I like vanilla porn.) I've also automated my browser to browse random normie bullshit.

>>59631484
the NSA already has our internet history idiot. I hope my future employers don't buy mine though

>>59631902
if you're Canadian bell and rogers is owned by at&t, if you're british you're pretty much already under surveillance and your data is being sold to the US, after all the UK LOVES selling out their citizens to the US

>>59631484
I just want more refugees to live with me.

Your processor and motherboard spy on you at the hardware level. The NSA already knows everything about your cock girl fetish.

Privacy was already gone. The only difference is now they can sell your interests to advertising companies.

>>59631783
your government sold you out. not american, so i don't give a shit.

>>59632014
>repealing law that did effectivly nothing
>sold you out
Really no need to involve yourself in american politicans if you are an ignorant foreigner

>>59631937
you're a fucking idiot. rogers communications bought the shares back in 2004. at&t was not even a majority shareholder. they didn't own more than 34% of the company. stop spouting bullshit.

File: 1485417204356.png (134KB, 446x343px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 446x343px

the commie hypocrisy is real right now. it must be a shitstorm on /pol/ right now.

>removing double-regulation and giving the job back to the FTC who already did this anyway

Oh no, it's the apocalypse.

>>59631937
Another thing, AT&T doesn't do business with Bell Internet subsidiary. You want to be an american so badly, go suck trumps cockaroni.

>>59631859
>This has been happening since Obama took office retard.

And the Obama administration signed away what little of the 4th amendment we still had left as they left office.
No big fanfare about that.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/01/obama-expands-surveillance-powers-his-way-out

>>59632146
>12333
nice trips

>>59631902
Yeah except this is a US website, idiot.

File: silly kunt.jpg (15KB, 276x276px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 276x276px

>>59632189
no it isn't

>>59631484
>So tomorrow when all of your Internet privacy is 100% gone
No idea what you're talking about.
Glorious Europe doesn't have those issues

>>59632232
this website is hosted in America AND The owner is a Japanese known for selling the data of 2ch users to third parties.

>>59631484
Oh it's the who are you quoting guy

>>59632014
At first, they came for the niggers, but I did not speak up, for I was not a nigger.

Then they came for the Jews, but I ignored it, for I was not Jewish.

Then they came for the women, but I did not care, for I was blessed to be a a male.

Then they came for me, and there was nobody left that would speak up.

I might be from the UK, but if I choose to ignore such major issues, I am digging my own grave when it eventually happens to my people.

>>59633646
You guys already got fucked last year.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/19/extreme-surveillance-becomes-uk-law-with-barely-a-whimper

I think that we, already, do not have enough privacy. Everything we do is registered everywhere.

If you do not believe me, just press (if you are using Google Chrome) CTRL + L and type: "chrome://dns", there you can see all websites you have visited, even if you have deleted your history several times since you installed it. Now imagine how people from your ISP knows what you search, what you like and probably where you are right now, reading this reply.

>>59633726
>DNS pre-resolution and TCP pre-connection is disabled.
am i good senpai?

>>59631484
This is how an average /v/ermin.

>>59631979
and dataminers

>>59632058
Nope. A bunch of /pol/ believes that the cable communications act of 1984 protects their privacy and/or that only anonymized data can be sold.

>>59632063
>ignoring the AT&T vs FTC decision last year that made the FCC regulations necessary to protect privacy
Oh no, it's another shill.

File: IMG_0174.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>living in a country where regular citizens are downright powerless to stopping new shitty corporatist laws like these

Have any of you considered that there's a more fundamental problem at hand?

>>59634439
Sure, but not enough people will ever reach that conclusion.

So are you gonna do something about it /g/? No your not haha looks like big hacker man 4chan isn't so big after all LOL

>>59634390
lol fucking idiots

>>59632617
You must be living in a different Europe to the one I live in then.

>>59632232
>>59632842

nip-moot was selling user data before it was cool.

>>59634637
Truly a pioneer

>>59631484
wasn't it already legal for them to sell such data? so wouldn't it have already been sold? They just struck down a law that would make it illegal to sell such data.

>>59634824
Until the court ruling last year, the FTC privacy regulations applied. The FCC regulations were introduced to cover the lack of privacy protections created by the AT&T victory.

>>59634569
The Netherlands is a magical place

>>59631484
>tell your parents what you watch on xvideos
That would be pretty scary, considering what I usually get off to.

>>59631484
I CANT BELIEVE DRUMPF, THE BIG CHEETO, SIGNED THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT THAT SAID THAT ISPS CAN SELL YOUR INFORMATION FOR PROFIT WHENEVER THEY LIKE TO THE NSA

Before this everything was fine but now Muslims have to live in fear because we have a white supremacist president who wants to sell Muslims and people of colors information to the government to track them and probably deport them all with his Nazi laws that he'll sign just like this law that he signed and invented and authored himself that said that ISPs can now sell your information.

File: 1360368220235.jpg (80KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 720x720px

>amerifats cucked again
AYYYYY

>>59635667
Woah now that's one hot anime baby dude

File: snowden.jpg (31KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x360px

>>59631484
>worst thing that can happen it's if nothing changes
Nothings changes, 'nothing to hide' niggers still use google, microsoft, facebook, apple products.

Loli is legal in my state so I'm fine.

>>59631484
Encrypted VPN gibberish.

>>59635686
They will see that only you use VPN in network.
If 'nothing to hide' vpn can give some sort of privacy, still use Tor is much better, if you open node it will be really hard to tell what exactly you do.

>>59631783
DRUMPFTARDS BTFO

>>59634474

gonna live inna woods
no electricity, no communications
lets see them mine my data now haha haa

I run my own ISP, no logs, feels good.

>>59631856
>land of the fucked

The NSA, and CIA will continue to spy on us but that isn't the issue. I am not ok with that, but there is nothing we can do about it.
I really don't want advertisers, and other private companies with my info and data.
If this law is passed I am going to have to fire up a VPN forever.

File: 1488675129189.png (24KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 657x527px

>>59631484
Nothing special. Looks like they'll find a lack of normie social media use and a shitload of time spent on /g/ and Hacker News.

Is this going to be retroactive? Can my ISP sell my browsing history from before the date the bill was signed into law, or only after?

>>59635850
How?

>>59633646
Fuck off you have those shitty signs with eyes saying "surveillance is a necessity" and the picture shows big eyes like big brother looking over the UK. Your country is a joke. The mayor of London is a muslim

>>59636044
Own ip block, bgp transit, shell company.

How does the traffic appear? I guess the ISP would take away the IP and replace it with a random ID so people could only get me if they know what I googled at a specific time for example.

can anyone confirm?

*raises VPN shield*

Psssh nice try kid

>>59636290
Can anyone confirm what 4324234 different ISPs with your data when they sell it? No.

They have an incentive to sell your identity with your habits, marketers will pay good money for targeted info like that.

>>59631484
what a disgusting fuck, I hope he is dead.

>>59636332
how targeted would it get though?

>out of the 16000 users who searched for lemonade, 600 of those searched for sugar right after

Should I care if I'm one of those?

with just my name could someone buy my history?

>>59636381
>>59636381
I have no idea how targeted it will get. I think that they will scoop up as much as they can, and sell as much as they can, only stopping when there's of it being illegal. Like publishing that you're nazi,feminist,fag, etc. maybe.

Their only goal is money.

And just having them collect this info and store it means it will be leaked. Computer security is a joke -- look at all the huge leaks.

I doubt someone would be able to buy your history like that. But if someone has a hookup, is a $10/hr employee, or has a friend..


>Should I care if I'm one of those?

That's more of a personal decision, lemonade/sugar isn't what matters.

>>59636107
Lucky.

I got nothing to hide, lads. Feels good!

>>59631484
I'll run a honeypot, buy /pol/s history and publish that shit. Really interested to see what kind of degenerates are always claiming cultural highground lmao

>>59631484
>what will the NSA find when they look at your IP?
You don't get it. If the NSA doesn't already have this ability, they're not doing their job.

The change in the law is to allow ISPs to monitor your traffic, harvest the data, collate it, and sell it.

They want to get in on the advertising party.

>>59631484
lol

>>59635714
Will Tor protect me?

>>59631484
they will find me waving my 10 inch schlong in front of my webcam and me telling them to suck it

>>59631484
>what will the NSA find when they look at your IP
They could already do that.

>>59631484
>Don't use social media
>Don't go to normalfag porn sites
I think i'll be fine.

File: 0afbc69335772f13fc9130fa433cc439.jpg (96KB, 465x310px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 465x310px

1. NSA was already doing that

2. ISPs were already doing that. Now it's just legal for them to do it.

3. They're not going to learn anything other than the fact that most people spend their time shitposting, watching porn, and playing video games

4. Trump is a useless piece of shit. He was a better choice than Clinton, but he's still fucking useless and isn't doing anything to stop this.

>>59636921
To some extent.

Your best options without spending more money or slowing you down are:

Run your own DNS, using different upstream than theirs.

Force https everywhere.

Slowing you down and or costing money will add:
You can use TOR

You can get a VPS, and tunnel everything through it. That will cost money, obviously.

And both options there slow you down a bit.

>>59631484
Fears ?
Lol i dont live in cUck S A

>>59637060
Memes aside, very few other places give you the mix of civil, social and intellectual freedoms that the US provides. Sure, politicians on both sides are chipping away at them, but we're still better off than most of the world. From a freedom standpoint.

File: 1363367767575.jpg (33KB, 704x396px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 704x396px

>>59631484
trumpcucks are already defending it

https://www.flake.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2017/3/flake-introduces-resolution-to-protect-consumers-from-overreaching-internet-regulation

>"My resolution is the first step toward restoring the FTC's light-touch, consumer-friendly approach. It will not change or lessen existing consumer privacy protections. It empowers consumers to make informed choices on if and how their data can be shared."

For emphasis:
>"It will not change or lessen existing consumer privacy protections."

It's almost as if the MSM is trying to push an anti-Trump narrative! I know it sounds absurd because the MSM would never lie to us.

Is this retroactive history or just history after the new bill?

>>59633694
>newspaper publishes article complaining about a story not being told

WASN'T THAT YOUR FUCKING JOB, NEWSPAPER?

Oh look it's another episode of americucks getting fucked over again. And again... and again... will you learn?

>>59637047
>NSA was already doing that so let everyone do that aven my dog

YEAY MURIKA

Que all the companies who buy your shit into database and send emails. "If you don't want your coworkers to see your dick pay 100$".

Also, "anon, I'm upset to find your browsing habits are against company policy. Please accept this 20% paycut."

>>59637241
I have money, can I buy your internet history? No?

Stop believing MSM lies.

>>59637241
>implying I don't want my co-workers to see my benis

>>59637266
1. Create a "security" company
2. sign a deal with ISP
3. ???
4. Profit