>buying a high end CPU (1800x / 6900k / etc)
>yet not owning one or multiple 1440p / 2160p monitors
>to the point of comparing gayming values by 1080p performance, when a 1800x/7700k setup should be auto bottlenecked by GPU since the screen its supposed to be connected to
>still playing in 1080p
>comparing 1080p benchmarks and pretending to be serious
>not owning a 2160p screen in 2017
I had a 1440p monitor that made 1080p look like shit
Now i've a 2160p monitor that made 1440p look like shit.
I can't even look at 1080p anymore
How autistic are you to see 1080p as a valid gayming comparison base for high end components
increasing resolutions is the most jewish trick, i bet you look at 4k screens the same way you looked at 1080p several years ago.
at first its beautiful, then you get used to it.
don't fall for the increasing resolution jew.
>>59605284
Resolution increasing is one of the least jewish trick ever.
It's 100% transparent. Better resolution = higher pixel density at same size = greater workspace at same size / legit game detail increase / etc.
>>59605689
ALL PLACEBO
Because dumping money on a CPU is much smarter than dumping money on a GPU.
People are still rocking 2600K's with 1070s or better and it's fine.
People are NOT rocking GTX 670s or 6970s anymore if they want to play anything modern at full HD
People who saved $150-200 on an unlocked i7 back in 2011 are still thinking of killing themselves over that mistake.
Gaming at full HD is fine when you want to concentrate on the playing experience, not benchmarking your computer and/or taking screenshots that look awful even in 4K. Their computers built around a good CPU will be good for whatever gaming in 2020. A 6600K will struggle.
>>59605252
Its just the Intel marketing that makes you believe that people still care about 1080p on the high end
>>59605252
The human eye cant see more than 1080p