http://www.anandtech.com/show/11227 /intel-launches-optane-m

>same price as larger capacity ssd's, little to no performance increase over them

So what's the advantage?

>>59605174
>literally slower than standard NAND

>>59605174
I don't understand what is there so special about this. I'm still good with my dirt-cheap half TB Sandisk SilkySuperDrive that cost me only 140 eurocoins.

Please enlight me OP.

File: UHKazO7.png (339KB, 960x669px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 960x669px

>>59605174
>tests performed against a hard drive
>less performance than shitty Intel SSDs except in low queue operation
>zero overprovisioning
>MTBF of ONE FUCKING YEAR
ok op, have fun

>>59605174
Another meme technology that won't help Intel compete with ryzen

>Endurance 100 GB/day


Rofl
So do I have to turn it off after playing a game for 3 hours?

>>59605174
oh cool
benchmark?

New meme?

>>59606227
Nah they want it to act like a swap partition and save your ram content when you put the computer to sleep.

Which is a fucking total misuse of the technology because its sequential performance is worse than even Intel's prior SSD

File: control.png (345KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 1280x720px

>Esport gamer
>Fanatic gamer

/v/ please

This might be good in a few gens when power draw lowers, sequential write improves and it doesn't cost like fucking $3 per GB while still retaining TLC V-NAND endurance!

So 3-4 years