>buggy chipset drivers >can just lock up, AMD in maximum

File: intelfags.jpg (282KB, 752x548px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 752x548px

>>59596126
>Intel faggot
>Doesn't want competition

>>59596237

No. It's just looking like they will remain the cheap knock-off and Athlon 64 days where they BTFO Intel are not coming back anytime soon.

>>59596256
Nobody's saying they're going to BTFO Intel's i7 K-SKU for gaming, at least not anytime soon. But the fact is Ryzen is gonna give you a hell of a lot more than you can get from Intel with the same money. Especially with Ryzen 5/3.

Intel just gives us shitty small improvements year after year. I'm not saying their processors are bad but at least AMD is trying to give us something more for the same money.

>>59596126
Bugs on a first release are expected, the thing is they get fixed. Intel has had similar bugs at launch but you wont mention those I'm sure.

File: 1487452561666.jpg (26KB, 192x171px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 192x171px

>intel has never had bad launches

>>59596126
>buggy chipset drivers
[citation needed]

Yeah but are they free open source?

>>59596126
Why would you regret eating a hamburger?
I eat one at least once a week and I don't feel any side effects.

>>59596126
>Imagine being at computers

>>59596126
>buggy chipset drivers
>can just lock up
sounds like Nehalem, Haswell, and Skylake

>>59596378

>Ryzen is gonna give you a hell of a lot more than you can get from Intel with the same money. Especially with Ryzen 5/3.


Anon you are making a mistake.

It's an objective fact that R7 CPU line up, specially 1700 has huge, unthinkable performance/price AND watt/performance advantage compared to Intel's 8-10 cores

Same thing with R5s and R3s as well

R5s again have better price/performance, watt/performance advantage when compered to Intel's i7 4/8-6-12 core line ups.

And again with R3. r3 has huge performance/price AND watt/price AND watt/performance advantage against Intel's 4/4 and 2/4s.

Other than media center-couch/emulator gaming Pentium, Intel has no objectively good product against AMD line up right now.

Don't go after brand loyality like a common mule, just buy the objectively better CPU which are Ryzen at the moment.

t. The guy who has a 4930k workstation, 8320 home server, 4790k gamin' pc

>intel launches a cpu
>it literally makes arithmetic errors because of DESIGN ERRORS in the alu
never forget

Intel literally has had a black box nobody knows what it's for since fucking 2006.
AMD does now too but they only started doing it in 2013.

File: so_fat_i_eat_computers.jpg (148KB, 800x619px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 800x619px

>>59596126
I AM FAT FUCK

>>59599638
>imagine being at computers
>so fat you look nd see food

its a fucking cpu unless there is a chipset problem its all about price per performance ratio.

File: intel BTFO.png (73KB, 1247x1194px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1247x1194px

>>59596126
>Buggy chipsets
>Still does better than intel
TOP GOY

File: Tzvika.png (521KB, 630x580px) Image search: [Google]

521KB, 630x580px

>>59596237

>>59596126
>SNAP recipients
fucking lost it right there

>>59596126
>Intel has never had a buggy chipset

>here, put this cia backdoor into your PC goy!

IMAGINE

>>59596126
>>buggy chipset drivers
Reminds of the glorious days of Super Socket 7 and VIA Chipsets.

File: AMD-TOLD.png (16KB, 441x495px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 441x495px

Wow incuks sure are buttranged.

>>59596237
Yeah man, I have a ryzen system and it works great. The only people that are bitching about it are people that don't have one. Every person that I've talked to that actually has one is completely satisfied.

>>59596126
at least AMD doesn't have known hardware backdoors and built-in wireless so any intel computer can be accessed remotely without even powering it on.