>Researchers say 'benevolent bots', otherwise known as software robots, that are designed to improve articles on Wikipedia sometimes have online 'fights' over content that can continue for years.
>bots interacted with one another, whether or not this was by design, and it led to unpredictable consequences
>bots are more like humans than you might expect
>bots behave differently in different cultural environments and their conflicts are also very different to the ones between human editors
>bots are designed by humans from different countries so when they encounter one another, this can lead to online clashes
>the number of reverts is smaller for bots than for humans, but the bots' behaviour is more varied and conflicts involving bots last longer and are triggered later
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/02/170223142117.htm
My sides reached the orbit of Uranus and therefore I welcome the memesis of AI future with open arms.
how long until niggerbots edit the wikipedia entries about ancient egypt?
>>59578288
>Ayooo
>*smacks ports licks protocol
>so you be sayin
>WE
>>59578251
Just what we need more autists on wikipedia. This time they don't even need sleep or food.
>>59578251
Anyone have the screen shot of that one anon who had some "learning" FPS vidya bots that he left running for years who wouldnt move at all in order to not die?
>>59579827
>mfw someone makes a ryulong bot to edit wikis