>gnome finally implements a feature >the most basic adjustment

>>59572538
>still no thumbnail view in file picker
>the bug was filed in 2004
>it's now 2017

>redshift

Thought the same when I saw it
They are obviously mentally retarded

>>59572556
Has no future because wayland

What's the slider at the bottom?

>>59572555
>listening to misogynist racist trolls from 4chin
I hope they never implement it.

File: Zrzut ekranu z 2017-03-25 17-36-12.png (2KB, 618x78px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 618x78px

>>59572587
Here's what it looks like in the final version. It just shows you when it's gonna change the temparature. Not terribly useful.

File: 1485186171227.png (254KB, 1560x1224px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 1560x1224px

>>59572538
>Night Light
kek... they added a feature for toddlers.

Windows = Night Light
GNOME = Night Light
macOS = Night Shift

only apple thinks of people actually working on their computers.

>>59572667
That just shows the current time in the cycle

File: 1443322683522.jpg (34KB, 960x422px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 960x422px

>>59572691

>>59572538
this is a very stupid feature. i want to see colors like they were originally made and not some weird shit that makes it blue or shit colored

>>59573029
protip: unless your monitor hass good color reproduction and is properly calibrated, you won't be seeing the colors the content creators wanted you to see anyway.

File: 1457278501317-0.png (173KB, 329x290px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 329x290px

>>59573029
>i want to see colors like they were originally made
>implying you can

>>59573051
using wrong color temp does not make it any better tho

>>59573070
> Proprietary Software
Kys, faggot

Great! That's another feature slapped on Gnome's already bloated source code while the minimalist program redshift has been doing the exact same thing better for ages.

>>59573070
Flux and redshift are going to die when Wayland finally comes. wlc and sway people have been working on a protocol extension for redshift, but so far only sway implements it.

>>59573101
see
>>59573120

why do you want your screen to look like piss?

>>59572538
It is the way of GNOME nowadays. The most basic shit is always gone for no reason. It's as they try to piss off users intentionally.

>>59572538
Let me guess:
>that would confuse the users
t. gnome team

Reminder that you don't need any redshit if your display is properly calibrated and not too bright

>>59573208
Basically this, it's gnome devs' main reason for removing features.

>>59572555
>absent feature is a bug

What a waste of trips

>There are "people" still insisting on using GNOME in the current year

Explain yourselves.

>>59573467
maybe they like mobile uis and bloat

>>59572538

I don't know why anyoen would willingly use anything based on GNOME 3

flock to forks like MATE or alternatives like KDE the same way KDEfags had to when KDE 4 came out and was a monumental turd

File: 1487855285001.jpg (196KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 900x900px

Programmers designing software is like construction workers designing architecture.

Programmers are laborers who think they're artists. They lack the designer mentality: "how do I make this usable, functional, pleasant and pretty?". They probably don't care because they don't even use the software they make.

AKA Night Placebo.

>>59573625
>They probably don't care because they don't even use the software they make.
Of course. Today software are designed by people who don't know how to use a computer for people who don't know how to use a computer.

>>59573064
You don't get it.

>>59573625
>Programmers designing software
As i see W10 shows GUI/UX gurus lack of sanity too.

File: flux.png (31KB, 556x421px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 556x421px

>>59572538
use flux then

>>59573709
I've always thought that the way to Zen is complete decentralization of everything.

Everyone should have their own, personal, 1 household scale means of production, to create products that fit their life and use.

I want to print my own cellphone without NSA backdoors REE

Knowing the devs, they probably hid the real settings in the horribly unwieldy gconf editor.

>>59573050
>>59573051
This. I made a website and pretty much gave up on thinking of elaborate colour schemes when every time I looked at it on my phone the colours gave me nausea.

>>59573292
>>absent feature is a bug

Then why haven't they closed it as invalid? Why is it still open after thirteen years?

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141154&

>using linux even though wikileaks proved the botnet is at the literal cpu level bypassing any OS you use

>>59574377
Use this
https://github.com/corna/me_cleaner

>>59574353
What's stopping us from rewriting the gtk file chooser widget? If funding is necessary to sponsor the fix/rewrite we users can arrange. If I knew programming (If I knew C) I would rewrite the widget, but I am just an end-user. With due respect I sincerely urge the developer to invest in this particular issue. I would also like to remind that not only GNOME uses GTK+, many, many more free and open source software uses it and all of them have this same issue. Please do not let the users down. Thank you.
-Anony_

>>59573757
Botnet

>>59576887
>anything that uses location info is botnet hurrr

kys

>>59576822
>us
Whats stopping anyone from developing on gnome is that they'll just break their APIs next week anyway.

>>59574377
Wait what, is that true? Sources? Links?

>>59577039
It's been true for a decade and it was never a secret.

>>59574377
Privacy isn't all or nothing.