>tfw you fell for the inkjet meme for 20 years of using computers

Yep same here. But that relief though is just to great

>>59549780
As much as it pains me to say, inkjets still have it all over laserprinters for color. Especially photographs. But other than that, yeah. Inkjets are trash.

>not using a continuous ink supply system
cheaper than laser and you can print on photo paper.

File: cis.jpg (74KB, 640x653px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x653px

>>59550270
doesn't solve op's problem.
For that, you need a cronjob.

All for double the size, double the initial cost (even more if you want color) and no photographic capabilities?

No, thanks. I absolutely hate printers and I've managed to live without owning one for the last few years, but I'd probably still get an inkjet if I had to buy one tomorrow.

>>59550914
Ink costs more than the printer itself, so its entirely worth it.
It's cheaper to just buy a new printer from the clearance section than it is to buy ink sometimes.

>>59552194
This and the ink, if not in use for a long time, will dry up and not be usable. Unless you want to clear up the blockage which is a pain and not necessary when you can go laser. Plus toners last indefinitely due to their initial cost and technology

>>59550270
>>59550426
Tell me more

>>59552194
You can also get used lasers from offices very cheap.
Professional printers with ethernet and automated duplex are like 50 bucks on ebay.
You just need to check if there are cheap toner cartridges available for the model.

>>59550914
Laser printers aren't even expensive.

>>59550914
>All for double the size, double the initial cost
Lasers are quite small and affordable nowadays
>Color
Meme, you don't need it.
>Photos
Take it to a store and have it done.

You will spent a shitload over time and get endless frustration from owning an inkjet.