Old Firefox ESR release: ~The only sane way to browse the web

>>59541722
ESR 52 will be the last good ESR because so many extensions won't work with 59.

>>59541742
XUL is utter shit. Mozilla is doing the right thing. Retarded luddites may keep their broken, insecure, buggy, unmaintainable, slow piece of crap :^)

>installed 10ESR FF on a P3 eeepc with 512MB RAM and windows 2000
>set up adblocking using hosts file
>I can use youtube on that
>fucking youtube that sometimes lags on Terry's nuclear reactor

>>59541801
I don't remember the last time I had stability problems on release (as in non-beta or nightly) Firefox.

I recently moved from Windows 10 + FX nightly to Windows 7 + FX 10 ESR
>no modern """minimalistic""" ui bullshit
>no forced updates
>no australis bullshit in fx
>downloads in a separate window
>preferences in a separate window
>fast af because back then mozilla actually had programmers instead of fat feminist lesbians
I never truly understood what is this "comfiness" you friends are talking about until now.

>>59541722
>low spec
>using debian instead of gentoo
Are you retarded? You could get RAM usage down by a lot thanks to the magic of USE flags.

>firefox 24
Oh wait, you ARE actually literally retarded.

What window decoration theme are you using Anon?

File: Vista-startpage.png (169KB, 1037x743px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1037x743px

Have you ever heard about Palemoon?

>>59542432
Modded OSX ambiance theme. The original theme came with emerald.

>>59542426
>actually memeing the >install gentoo meme

>>59542448
yes, it's slower than FF24ESR in my experience

>>59541722
>HTTP
Why? Can't get HTTPS to work with such an old version of Firefox?

>>59541801
This. If developers no longer care about their addon(s), why should Mozilla? They can't keep supporting legacy code forever. If the addon is really that desirable as claimed, then an alternative will be made.