Can someone explain to me why the 7700K fails at minimum frames

>corelets

AMD provides quality frames and Intel provides quantity frames .

7700k at 90%- 100% utilization during gaming, if scene suddenly ask for more it choke. it more appearance at 4k since fps is lower

>>59507443
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7OAxYYaCyo&t=0s

TFW hairworks is enabled at 8x AA, and has same frames as a 7700K with no hairworks

>>59507466
>>59507516
Dis

>>59507516
One more to add, if reviewer decided to avoid the "choke" point, 7700k would win easily in frametimes and minimum

I laugh so hard that this game was released 4 years ago, while shills are still buying quad cores and destroying their future gaming fps

>>59507443
BUT YOU HAVE MORE FPS LOOKING AT THE GROUND :DDD

>>59507443
Because Intel is a company strictly for 9 year olds. AMD is for black people, because it runs faster

>>59507608
Any review with current frames and frame times can show us that even at 1080p the 1800X performs better at lowest 1% frames in modern games that support cores (the inevitable future of PC gaming and why Ryzen 7 is 8 core, as we can't build significantly faster cores anymore)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TId-OrXWuOE

>>59507592
you sound like a sjw

GO AMD GO !!
YOU CAN DO IT

>>59507674
sjw is anyone that does things smarter than conservative shills paying for extra CEO yachts

>>59507443
quad cores aren't future or even modern proof obviously

>>59507695
Those are commie bros
SJWs are a splinter group that stand only for the "moral" points of communism while undermining the whole way by feeding into capitalism

>>59507516
dis. reviewers never show about mini stutters which amd doesn't suffer from.

>>59507553
the fuck?
also have an itch to play witcher after this, damn no, not for the third time!

>>59507443
Why are people comparing a 330$ cpu to a 500$ one tho?

Wouldn't comparing it to a 6800k for example? Or even the 7800k, whenever that comes out?

>>59508387
Because that $350 CPU is currently the best in the world at gaming. We can't compare to CPUs that don't exist yet.

The fact that it beats a $500 dollar CPU is just cause for alarm for AMD. Amongst people who do nothing but game. And who don't care about future proofing. Or power consumption. Or platform longevity.

>>59508421
Ain't the 1800x more of a content creator CPU rather than a straight up gaming one?

Also doesn't the 7700k beat even the 1k$ Intel cpus aswell?

I guess we'll just have to wait and see for Ryzen 5.