>https://arstechnica.com/informatio n-technology/2017/03/

>>59501373
Is this for servers or something? What would the use case be for such a ecosystem?

>>59501482
I don't think even Intel knows.

>>59501482
their shitty xeons don't support enough ram, so they created small higher capacity ram for the servers

meanwhile amd is developing processors which support 12TB of ram per socket

>>59501595
But we only need 8GiB of RAM...

>>59501643
For MUH VIDYA.

File: 1419656063270.jpg (125KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 640x960px

>tfw fell for the 375GiB RAM meme

File: RAM.png (29KB, 659x588px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 659x588px

>>59501643
>>59501669
Sorry but 8GB is not enough.

>>59501729
>I don't know how RAM is used: the post

And here I thought I was on /g/

>>59501754
How do I not understand you huge fucking retard? I keep shit running like two browsers with 20 tabs each.

>>59501595
>their shitty xeons don't support enough ram

There is not a single computer on Earth, server, super computer, or otherwise that has even hit the 2008 Xeon RAM-per-board limit.

>>59501784
How do I not understand you huge fucking retard? I keep shit running like five instances of Skyrim with ENB mod on each one

>>59501830
Cool

>>59501643
underage b&

>>59501754
This isn't on Linux retard, Windows shows you what is used not what is in use and ready to be filled

>>59501873
>I don't know how RAM is used: the retard strikes back

>>59501824
>The biggest benefit may be from substantially increasing the amount of physical memory in a server: 2 socket Xeon systems can hold up to 3TB of RAM, but 24TB of Optane, and 4 socket systems support up to 12TB RAM, but 48TB Optane. This could be a huge boost for applications that need truly enormous quantities of memory.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/03/intels-first-optane-ssd-375gb-that-you-can-also-use-as-ram/

Yet another Intel blunder.

Good. Fucking dipshits.
>I-its going to be a thousand times faster though goy

>>59501482
>>59501373
yeah so it's actually faster than ssds, theoretically 1000x but 5-7 atm. it's can be used as fast ssds but also as (server) cache, so trending/current stuff will fetch faster. http://bgr.com/2017/03/20/intel-optane-3d-xpoint-ssd/

>>59502119
It's got low ass latency so it's great for low queue random read, but in sequential it falls behind SSDs. Endurance is terrible, absolutely terrible though.

>>59501373
That's huge.

Swapping is expensive. Very expensive. This solves a huge problem.

>>59502296

Nuh uh, this AMD shill board says it's bad and Intel is doomed and will be bankrupt by 2018.

>>59502296
Nope, write endurance means if you use this fucker as RAM it'll die in a matter of months.

File: screenshot_3064.png (8KB, 863x180px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 863x180px

>>59501921

>>59501921
>Standby = in use

>>59501824

ignorant intel fanboy who only knows video games detected.

>>59501921
>>59501754
>Not capitalizing titles.
How can the reader even infer that you are making a fictitious titular joke?

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/capitalization-in-the-titles/

>>59501947
or you can go AMD with more memory by default with faster memory available, and a more powerful server CPU with better energy efficiency on top of things.

And if you STILL need more memory, then you can buy this expensive optane crap for the AMD server.

no wonder intel kept delaying this shit so much

>>59503138
>And if you STILL need more memory, then you can buy this expensive optane crap for the AMD server.
Nope, it's locked to Intel CPUs

>>59501729
>1600MHz
Pathetic speedlet.

>>59503689
>Falling for the faster RAM is better meme

>>59501643
>>59501729
newfags don't know about my 8 + 4 GB of RAM

>>59501373
This sounds like something for more powerful IOT devices further down the road? Idk

>>59503673
>locked to Intel CPUs
>no server CPUs support it yet
Whats the point of this product? Is it to annoy me?

>>59501373
when does it come out, I've been wanting this kind of shit forever

File: iknow.png (22KB, 486x407px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 486x407px

>>59503771
i knot goyim!

>>59504186
1500$ for 375gb

:^)