I would use Debian instead of Arch if only their wiki had be

Arch: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wireless_network_configuration
Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi

However, I think Gentoo wiki is the comfiest:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Wifi

>Ian Murdock announced the birth of Debian
keks

File: 1489302449774s.jpg (2KB, 125x65px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x65px

>>59491868

>>59491897
>posting thumbnails

>>59491715
Arch users literally want someone to hold their hand while they copy paste commands into the terminal.

>>59491868
> Vacuum cleaner cord
> JTRIG operation

which one was it?

>>59491658
Meh, unless you want fucking stability debian is totally out of choice.

>>59492015

>not being an ant

>>59494036
Debian unstable (sid) > Arch
Maybe Arch devs are faster if it's about making packages as upstream as possible, but Debian feels more condensed, it supports more platforms, community is better and what's most important - Debian is better recognized as Linux distribution in among professionals.

the archfag thinks he needs a wiki because he's so used to looking up documentation due to it breaking. hilarious

>>59494036
I don't know about that.
Back when KDE was a shitshow (so a few times), it was seemingly stable on Debian.

File: 1489898478365.png (134KB, 724x508px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 724x508px

>>59491897
>s.jpg

File: 1463501174646.jpg (43KB, 1875x975px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1875x975px

>>59492015
>>59494058
>>59497019
Apologies. selected the wrong pic. here's the big one.

>>59497082
triggered