Found this book today at the uni. Should I do the exercises even if I'm not interested in Lisp/Scheme?
>>59453994
No. Sell it for a meme price. It's an absolute worthless book.
>>59453994
learning is for faggots
>>59453994
S teers
I incipient programmers towards
C ompetent
P rogramming practices
also, are SICP lectures worth watching to accompany the book?
>link related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Op3QLzMgSY&list=PL8FE88AA54363BC46
>>59454633
No. It's a complete waste of time and they are old as fuck. Just forget about it.
>>59453994
Not really. 3 out of 5 chapters are dedicated to things specific of lisp. But, it's not like learning the syntax of a new language is challenging so why not just do it in scheme and lisp.
>>59453994
Lot to learn from that book. But MIT switched to Python as intro lang because they realized programming is mostly slapping together libraries.
>>59454824
the world runs on shitty code. design isnt a bottle neck in 99% of applications.
What is a book that teaches the same as SICP but has exercises in a modern language?
>>59455146
htdp?
>>59454471
meme price? I got a copy for like $7 shipped online
>>59455146
Composing programs. Literally written as the successor to SICP (in Python)
>>59455521
>>59455146
(It's an interactive website not a book because its not 1990)
>>59455146
object oriented programming in ruby
i'm just shitposting, I haven't actually read any programming book
>>59455584
>object oriented programming in ruby
actually this is what the book is called and this is the book
>>59454572
Shit this guy
Is really bad at acronyms
Crap
Pee
>>59455146
>>59455584
Perhaps "Understanding Computation" (pub O'Reilly), it uses ruby, and teaches the core theoretical concepts of CS.
>>59456322
So is this guy
Is really bad at mocking
Caged
Platypus