Why is Applel the only mainstream laptop manufacturer that regularly produces 16:10 laptops?
>>59448971
Dunno. You should ask them.
>>59448971
I've been asking this myself for years. 16:10 is the sweet spot. Just bring 16:10 ThinkPads bag fucking CIA Niggers! NIGGERS!
>>59448971
They never fell for the 16:9 (gaymen manchild) meme
>>59449037
This gif isn't accurate though. If you compare 16:9 to 16:10 you'll notice that instead of having less horizontal space 16:10 has just more vertical space. If you got the same horizontal resolution on both you should see more on strategy games. For example, on 1920x1200 you got more vertical space but not less horizontal space than on 1920x1080.
>inb4 "but muh shooter FOV"
fucking idiot, adjust your FOV if you want to play shooters.
>>59449083
>>59449037
I think this meme came from 1680x1050 still being the most used 16:10 res when 1920x1080 already was the de facto standard for 16:9
>>59448971
The God tier Menu bar uses 80px on non retinal Macs, space for that makes good use of 16:10
>>59449083
>This gif isn't accurate though.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_of_view_in_video_games#Field_of_view_scaling_methods
>>59449180
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hor169.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hor1610.jpg
Compare the two. You'll notice that the 16:10 one has a smaller horizontal resolution than the 16:9 image. I specifically compared 1920x1080 with 1920x1200 though. And even if, in some game, the horizontal FOV is smaller on a 16:10 screen it should be adjustable. If FOV isn't adjustable a game should be avoided anyways. Standard FOV is almost always too small.
>>59448971
Idk, but 16:12 is superior.
>>59448971
>>59449509
That's 4:3 nigger
>>59449837
You mean 32:24
>>59448971
Because they care and they don't buy cheapest chink/gookshit LCD panels that others do.
>>59448971
To be unique and give themselves some sort of brand name
>not interested in Apple's laptops
>there are no 16:10 Retina iMacs