Is there any point buying point and shoots now that smart phone

>>/p/

>>>/p/

>>59444000
Dubs trips for truth.

Short answer: maybe.

>>59443952 (OP)
>Is there any point buying laptop now that android tablet are so good?

>>59443952
>Sony RX100
>Point and shoot
Are you serious, anon?

>>59444046
Prosumer is just an high-end point and shoot.

>>59443952
>>>/p/oo in the loo

>>59444030
Boom, roasted

>>59443952
Yes, my 2007 Ixus is better than your phone.

>>59443952

Smart phone cameras are great now, but they're noisy as fuck in lower light.

phone cameras are garbage

Any camera without physical controls is trash. If you have to navigate digital menu to take a picture it's not a real camera.

>>59444784
no one said a smartphone is a real camera

>>59444472
Not better than my 2 camera iphone 7 plus with 4 leds flash

Tiny smartphone lenses have limited physical resolution

File: e9d.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>59444967
kys

I noticed this too. My Google Pixel takes images just as good as my 760d

Phoneposters posting blurry """12 megapixel""" JPEGs
Just look at /bst/
Most images could be reduced to 3-4 megapixels with no loss of information

>>59443952

Well, optics maybe?

What are you doing on a technology board without knowing how shit a phone camera compared to a real camera is?

>>59443952
Yes.
But only because smartphone cameras still aren't good.

>>59443952
Yes

>>59443952
Smartphone cameras arent great. Got my galaxy s6 because it supposedly had one of the best smartphone cameras and the quality is all over the place. Any video washes out the colors too.

Only if you have a high-end Lumia.