>Ryzen 1600X flagship 6-core for $249 USD >surely will

if you don't buy the lowest end of each core count and overclock you are a fool

File: ryzen 5.jpg (247KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1920x1080px

>>59432650

>>59432650
Her voices always surprises me

I expect a chinese accent whenever she speaks

>>59432698
Asian Americans speak better American than whites

>>59432666
I would actually argue that because of binning the higher clockspeed and single core performance would outweigh the few dozen extra dollars.

>>59432968
ironically higher clocked bins draw less power

>>59432650
this is not gonna beat the i7 7700K. don't be fucking delusional.

if anything, it will solidly wreck the equally priced KBL i5 chips by matching them in single thread perf and smashing them horrifically in parallel workloads.

with X99 and i3/i5 dead, Intel is going to get hammered into their tiny mainstream i7 corner.

>>59433560
it's also going to make 6 core x99 chips irrelevant as well.

>>59432650
Doubt it will beat the i5...

>>59433560
If

>6800k>7700k

Then

>1600X>7700k

Considering AMD has the superior SMT implementation i'm betting it will soundly trounce both.

>>59432775
Garbage accent I want to see a chink speak with a true Alabama accent