>$30 cheaper than the Haswel and Skylake i3's >same

>poornigger chips

Intel got spooked by Ryzen.

>dual core in the year of our lord

Actually the 4560 is THE chip

>>59418647
>pentium
sorry is this 1997?

>>59418722
You're thinking of celeries.

File: [HorribleSubs] Kobayashi-san Chi no Maid Dragon - 10 [720p].mkv_snapshot_03.09_[2017.03.15_14.20.51].png (310KB, 439x387px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 439x387px

>>59418647
>buying a 2 core 4 thread CPU
>in 2017

2 core CPUs are only excusable if you're ultra poor, buying it for your grandma, or are using it for something light like your own mail/DNS server.

>>59418845
>he doesn't run a public DNS out of his home
pleb

File: UTHepzS.png (610KB, 940x1959px) Image search: [Google]

610KB, 940x1959px

>>59418691
>>59418845
This, 4 cores is the absolute minimum right now.

AMD R3 chips should be arriving soon but I highly recommend at least the the R5 1400.

Why is it so cheap compared to an i3?

>>59418845
This
The PC i built for my mom has a 2 core 4 thread i3.
It's actually very fast for the price point
Dropped an old hyper 212 on that bitch and the fan doesn't even go past idle.

>>59418902
My i3 6100 overclocked will run basically any game at 60fps

Sure if you want 144Hz it'll bottleneck but if you're buying an i3 you can't afford a 144Hz monitor

File: Capture.png (24KB, 583x572px)

24KB, 583x572px

>>59418902

ummm, threds is all that matters now

>>59418845

>paying literally $150-200 more just for 2 physical cores without HT
>literally same single clock speeds
>only 10% better multi thred improvment
>have to pay autism for i7s to get actually more cores

>>59418902

>that wattage

did they use 775 socket as their benchmark?

>>59419167
>Fake cores are better than real cores

Can all the shilltel cocksuckers please self-immolate themselves?

>>59419194
That just shows how much of a scam Intel is running with their trash i3/i5/i7 lineup and pricing. Intel's panic flailing moves in the face of AMD's rising competition are exposing it for what it is.

>>59418902
minimum for what? to be called a gaymer neet?
sure -> /v/

>>59419599
Kill yourself, retard.

File: 1488729817546.png (3MB, 4000x2309px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4000x2309px

>not enough

>>59418691
Poorfags are playing poorfag games, which are either free to play (and optimised for laptops and low end systems) or old. The g4560 is a good product for it's target market.

>>59419621
>hurr durr it's gud enuf fur muh vidya why would you ever want to do anything else with your PC?

Drink bleach. A lot of it.

>>59419609
whoaahh, strong argument there, r u gonna call mommy? and tell her that ppl bully and your processor you over the internet??

>>59418845
Most laptops are still dual core... Because laptops dominate the market outside of gaming, most applications are going to be coded with dual core as the very least as the minimum spec for the near future.

>>59419652
>hurr durr im professional i koded last year also i need 100core to shitpost and watch anime at the same time

>>59419652
Then why do people reply with:
>>59418673
>>59418691
>>59418722
>>59418824
>>59418845
>you must use your computer for whatever reason I use and only

>>59419621
>min framerates under 60 in one game, at 60 in two, and barely above 60 in another

Throw in a web browser or music and you'll be dipping below 60 lol.

>>59419652
vidya is one of the most cpu intensive things out there for a normie, especially demanding vidya. I guarantee you that the majority of PC users are more prone to gayming than content creation.

>>59419936
i only see 1 minimum frame at 55 in bf1 and with 100avg
but maybe its too hard for a non gamer 2 understand these charts

>>59419652

nigger we are talking about a $60 chip here. literally an entry point chip.

you have two choices as far as $65 bucks will bring you.
AMD Athlox x4 860k or Pentium G4600. And the Pentium, with less cornz, is better.

>>59419936
lol @ you thinking firefox will drag my fps down.

>>59418694
this

>>59418694

yeah but nobody has it in stock except the jews and they're charging $70 for it

this is faster an better an only $10 more and plus i didnt have to wait till after fucking schlomo-day for them to take my order since apparently this last friday was another jewish muh feelings day

>>59420039

or you know...casually shitposting and streaming HD content and dont wanna bother with GPUs so they get a cpu that can do everything and doesnt even require case fans to run because its never hotter than 80 deg from the mobo and the CPU is around 20-30 with the stock fan and no dust

>>59421818
Its 49€ in the europes

Too bad its 54 W, I wanted to build some little server

>>59421922

its out of stock for all the MSRP shops, only BH has it

>>59421950
Well, as I said I'm on the europes, amazon and 2 online hardware shops from my country have it in stock

People here is too retarded to buy anything that don't have "gamer" stuck into the name

Pentium lacks AVX because of Jews.

>>59419621
>doesn't show maximums, 1%, 0.1%, or frametimes
FUCKING GARBAGE GRAPHS

>>59424121
>1%, 0.1%, or frametimes
Thinking that matter for CPU test, wat an idiot

Frametimes GPU driver problem, or poorly coded engine

File: 1488436502224.jpg (26KB, 411x412px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 411x412px

>>59418902
My 6100U works just fine for web browsing, and my gayming pee cee has a 4130.

>>59418647
>Wattage
>Conveniently not advertised

Do you have fire insurance?

File: cc6b50cf2e3bea94af89d0bd2aa037f3-1200-1422.png (178KB, 1200x1422px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1200x1422px

>>59419621

i was like almost sold on this chip as im looking for a budget option, but then i actually looked at the lows.

dips of 30fps-50fps. that can not translate into a smooth game play experience.

wonder if an overclocked to hell Athlon x4 860k would do better?

>>59418647
It's pretty god tier for budget builds

Intel is absolutely killing AMD in price-performance now

>>59424987
It's only 51W

File: 1476024898381[1].png (264KB, 570x683px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 570x683px

>there will never be another g3258

This thread makes me ashamed of my fellow AMD fans...
Stop being such autists, if AMD made a CPU that cheap and it performed well you would rave and bitch about it to Intel drones.
Grow up and stop this retardation

>>59418647
>2 threads
kek

>>59421818
I bought one from them and they had it shipped within 48 hours.

>>59427502
>checked intel's page
>says 4 threads
>anon claims 2 threads

Hmm

>>59427872
He's an AMD shill

AMDshill on suicide watch

>>59426965
The 860k can't really compete, it's not about the clock, it's the architecture that do the magic here.
Some games used to lag or stutter on Pentiums because of core/thread count and old & cheap amd quad cores gave maybe less FPS but better overall smoothness, right now these new 2c/4t Pentium wipes every amd cheap and mid-range CPU for almost any kind of use, gaming included

File: 4560.png (119KB, 622x1051px)

119KB, 622x1051px

>>59426965
It doesn't even come close.