http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa ge=news_item&px=Chro

File: 1469309230745.png (2MB, 1011x3032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1011x3032px

We already have transparency support in webms, APNG is DOA.

Besides if we need to replace anything, it would have to be JPG and PNG with WebP.

>>59408650
t. autism

We need an animated looping image format, a perfect gif replacement

When will animated WebP arrive?

>>59408874
>We need an animated looping image format, a perfect gif replacement
>When will animated WebP arrive?
BRUH...

https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/faq#why_should_i_use_animated_webp

Also what's wrong with looping webms and hiding the video controls?

>>59408902
I'm probably just nostalgic for gif and want a perfect replacement

>Also what's wrong with looping webms and hiding the video controls?
takes too much work desu

>>59408650
kys. in the most painful way you can think of. you're fucking retarded and a waste of life.

File: a47c43930ec34bf06e3e8cd4d718f8fd.png (245KB, 540x668px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 540x668px

>>59409059
Why are you so upset anon? You genuinely seem upset behind that meme mask. You can talk to me about if you want, I'm willing to be a shoulder to cry on if you're genuinely hurt.

File: shanghai.png (291KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 800x800px

>>59408650
wow i didn't know webp was that much better than jpeg

File: 1481421817701.jpg (101KB, 777x717px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 777x717px

>>59409100
kys. seriously. just do it.

>>59409188
Alright, hope things get better man.

>>59409188
>>59409059
pls stop bullying people in my thread

File: 1481060883424.jpg (65KB, 600x902px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x902px

>>59409209
they will. good luck and hope you succeed on the first try.

File: wink-composite.png (2MB, 1800x2224px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1800x2224px

>>59408650
I had to double check this so I made my own comparison. It's true, WebP really is this good. At least for animu anyway. But hey the bright colors and high contrast make it easy to see artifacts.

>>59409588
what is wrong with her face?

(No but seriously who's this character)

>>59408496
NEVER
E
V
E
R

;_;

>>59408650

webM's are videos though, you mongoloid

apng/gif have universal playback, they'll play and work on all the web the same. with mp4/webm you need a bunch of hacks just to make appear like a gif/apng

>>59410590
see
>>59408902

>>59410499
Are you even 18?

>>59410554
Yeah because another arbitrary image format is just what we need to shit up the web when webp exists.

>>59410617
WebP is already shit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Better_Portable_Graphics
>BPG makes APNG and muted WEBM obsolete

>>59410617
>arbitrary
wew

png support is everywhere. A apng file viewed with a program that does not support it will only show the first frame rather that fail out.
it's a very compatible introduction to a new format and not much needs to be changed to support it. The only current blocker is PNG Group vs Mozilla dick waving.

>>59410684
Shit, should've just linked this.
http://bellard.org/bpg/animation.html

File: bpg_apng.png (59KB, 303x337px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 303x337px

>>59410684
>>59410698

>>59410684
>>59410698

Good format but people are too scared to use it because of patent faggotry.

File: GameOver.png (4KB, 696x316px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 696x316px

You can argue about technical aspects forever. It doesn't matter.
What matters for a new format is universal support. It should work in all browsers, or it's as good as dead.

>>59409588
holy fuck lol I totally forgot about this parking ad bitch

>>59410739
IE is irrelevant so APNG wins

>>59411097

Yep. In mobile web especially.

>>59409588
Source?

>>59408496
literally took them 9 years after firefox to add it? why?

>>59408902
>Also what's wrong with looping webms and hiding the video controls?
Browser's video players suck

>>59410684
>BPG
lol is this nigga serious

>>59412202
Sucking MNG and then WebP dick

>>59410684
BPG is DOA and will never be used. Seriously, stop wasting your time on it

>>59410554
W-Why not?

>>59411938
bump