Ryzen R5 and R3's spotted on ASRock website. http://ww

File: 1487187490966.png (292KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 512x512px

>>59406325
>2mb cache

File: 1430460027689.png (450KB, 812x720px)

450KB, 812x720px

>>59406361
>she sees your cache

File: 17218315_321747084895209_2518136169596190975_o.jpg (155KB, 1200x1130px)

155KB, 1200x1130px

>>59406446

>>59406325
>2MB of cache
So no L3 Cache then? Or is this a mistake?

>>59406446
>>59406361
Cachelets, when will they learn?

>>59406607
I don't know, you can compare it with the A4 CPUs they have publically listed. http://www.asrock.com/support/cpu.asp?s=AM4

File: 1262849707105.jpg (344KB, 1280x720px)

344KB, 1280x720px

>>59406325
>mfw my old q9550 has 2x6MB l2 cache

>>59406607
It apparently only reports the L2 cache. There's 2MB of L2 cache per core, 8MB of L3 cache per core complex.

>>59406607
they only list L2. The R7 series is listed as 4mb. There is no way the r5 wont have L3.

>>59406824
>There's 2MB of L2 cache per core
*512KB of L2 per core

>>59406962
Thanks I had just realized I screwed it up.

>>59406962
Also, if that's right it would mean that the 1600 would have 768KB of L2 per core instead of 512KB of L2 per core like the current Zen processors.

>>59407008
More cache to go around, I guess.