>tfw no one is interested in creating an architecture designed

>>59397119
>clock speeds
If you think that this is all there is to CPU performance, you clearly know nothing.

>>59397131

That assumption would also assume that I believe the FX9350 performs better than Kaby Lake. I am sad that you think anyone could be that ignorant.

I'd just like to see it from a design standpoint.

>tfw the most prominent speed demon microarchitecture limited potential clock speeds by having to have parts of it clocked 2x higher

>>59397172
>I'd just like to see it from a design standpoint.
Architectures that push clock frequencies up to above 5-6 GHz exist, it's just that they have little practical applications and require liquid nitrogen cooling systems.

>>59397832
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_zEC12_(microprocessor)

This reaches 5.5GHz with water cooling.

>>59397119
Imagine the cooler on that baby!