What video editing software does /g/ use? I'm going to start

>>59362597
>what video editing software does /g/ use?
vapoursynth + ffmpeg + vim

>>59362597
I've tried a few FOSS ones, and Blender felt the most polished. I'm no expert though.

>>59363042
post result

>>59362597
Final Cut X

Kdenlive

>>59362597
I'm in the field, there are 3 alternatives among professionals: Avid Media Composer, Final Cut and Premiere.
Ignore the first: currently it is used only in higher levels, it is difficult to crack and definitively not user friendly, you have to give yourself a very strict workflow to use it well, something that doesn't happen at first.
Final cut is the go-to for macfags, I used final cut X and I assure you it is nothing special. Of course it works but it is not something you'd need. I heard in the final cut 7 days it was incredibly good. Performance on OSX are incredible tho, you could edit 4K on a coreM.
My advice is to go with premiere, it is well recognized and used in lower and mid levels so it is not something you'll only use, it is quite easy to use but still offers a lot of flexibility, it used to be basically a toy at first but nowadays it is perfect to learn and for small projects.
Sony Vegas is fine but nobody uses it for work. Good for making memes on youtube, so it makes no sense for me.

File: Sequence 01.webm (3MB, 720x405px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x405px

>>59363712

Vegas is very easy to use and has lots of Gaymer plugins, really isn't a long-term product though.

Premiere is incredible, seamless integration with Photoshop and After Effects makes it way stronger than other programs for most projects.

In terms of pure workflowing Avid is the king, it's not built for adding effects or doing actual 'editing' - but for building TV shows and stringing together movies it's undoubtedly the king.

Overally premier is the best mix, you can use it for anything from shitty YouTube memes to full industry editing.

>>59363727

what are you settings in Premiere?!

File: 1489289300317.jpg (68KB, 685x548px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 685x548px

>>59363894
settings? this?

>>59363718
this so much

>>59363894
I use premiere pro cs6. newest one I managed to get to work cracked

for a full hd video mine are like this

timebase 30fps
frame size 1920 x 1080
square pixels
no fields
display formar 30 fps

audio 48000
display format audio samples

preview file format I-Frame only mpeg
width 1920
height 1080

noch maximum bit depth or render quality


----


I export a video like this

file > export > media

format H.264
preset (leave it - will be custom after you change stuff below)

export video and audio checked

go to the video tab

width 1920
height 1080
framerate 30
square pixels
tv standard ntsc
profile high
level 5.1
render at maximum depth

bitrate encoding vbr 2 pass
target bitrate 80
maximum bitrate 100

no advanced settings


audio tab

audio codec aac
sample rate 48000 hz
channels stereo
audio quality high

bitrate kbps 192

advanced settings
precedence checked

multiplexer tab
multiplexer mp4
stream compatability standard

down below
use maximum render quality

export - thats it

>>59363718
Depends on where you live too.
In Japan a lot of people use Edius, for example.

>>59364486
Italianfag here, but I don't think things are that different in Europe/ USA. As long as you use one of these 3 you are at least recognized. Among youngs or people who started their business in the last 5/10 years premiere is absolutely the most used, if not the only one, someone tried final cut because he had a Mac but eventually switched to premiere for compatibility with colleagues

>>59364486
I heard edius is ok and very cheap to actually buy.
no need to download cracks