I have a question about female companion robots/sex robots.
Roxxxy was released in 2010 (BTW its website looks crappy). For that price she is quite ugly and has no well intelligence. Now is 2017 and still there is no any another female robot available for buying, only dead silicone dolls. Why is that?
At least Japanese manufacturers may create something, but even they offers only simple dolls. I need a better girlfriend than dead doll or stupid Roxxxy.
>>59346787
social pressure
It's Roxxxy
>>59346787
They haven't figure out how to get past the uncanny valley. Also, forget about AI on sexbots. The technology simply isn't there yet.
>>59346808
It's weaker than a lot of money. There is a great demand.
>>59346814
>how to get past the uncanny valley
Manga stylisation, like on the pic
>The technology simply isn't there yet.
We already have some sort of AI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkcKaNqfykg
>>59346814
>They haven't figure out how to get past the uncanny valley
These look fine.
>>59346849
Yeah. I want one of them, but robots, not simple dolls.
>>59346842
>>59346849
While an anime style might be fine for some people it would weird out the ones that aren't into that (normies/most people). I think the best approach is to simply use sex dolls + vr. That way you can customize the doll in whatever you want it to look like.
>>59346787
>has no well intelligence.
Not on her own in that respect, apparently.
>>59346981
Where I can buy it?
>>59346849
These look nice
Too bad they're banned by feminists and cuckolds
And sketching little grills is questionable enough, I don't know what my dad would think if I bought one of these.
They're probably too difficult to clean anyway
>>59347079
Your dad should disown you because rustle has a horrible artstyle.