ayyyy https://videocardz.com/67242/amd-ve ga-with-64-compute

>>59334467
Can we not do this again? Listening to the Intel shills crap on because you idiots slightly overhyped Ryzen's gaming performance has been bad enough, don't overhype this one too.

FUCK YOU FUCK YOU

>>59334467
Lmao back to back Nvidia and Intel threads BTFO!!

File: OsLA18e.png (853KB, 861x889px) Image search: [Google]

853KB, 861x889px

>>59334506
>WHAT!? A BRAND NEW PROCESSOR DOESN'T PERFORM BETTER AT LAUNCH THAN A PROCESSOR WITH AN ARCH THAT'S HAD 20 YEARS OF OPTIMIZATIONS?

AMD blown the fuck out r-right guys?

File: Capture.png (147KB, 318x254px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 318x254px

>>59334467


These are Fury X numbers, you got to pump those numbers up

https://compubench.com/compare.jsp?benchmark=compu15d&did1=26470338&os1=Windows&api1=cl&hwtype1=dGPU&hwname1=AMD+Radeon+R9+Fury+X&D2=AMD+687F%3AC1

>>59334467
not really destroying it at all and a year late.
#wait4vega was totally worth it

>>59334620
Fury X confirmed for being as good as a 1080

>>59334594
this isnt the ryzen thread you know

>>59334467

who is this sperm extractor?

File: kkoh5.gif (51KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 640x480px

>>59335781
Im not the one who brought it up to begin with.