How come we have OLED TVs but no OLED monitors? Not even an

>>59327480
> Static image burn in
> Inconsistent pixel wear rates lead to artifacts on static images like desktops
> Cost/Yield

Because there are a lot of people still buying shitty (((gayming))) 1920x1080 tn monitors priced over 500$

>>59327520
No there isnt retard

Lenovo and Dell have released OLED laptops. Apparently the technology has problems with brightness and viewing angle. You can't sell a display for premium prices if it's dim and the colors go off as you move your head. If they can't charge top dollar it's not worth their time to invest in developing the technology.

>>59327520
Lol what?

>>59327504
FPBP

>>59327504
Therefore OLEDs are also meme? why TV aficionados are craving for OLEDs?

>>59327550
>viewing angles
Remind me again why that's important?

>>59328059
So you can look at your screen

>>59328079
Viewing angles don't affect that unless you're an idiot who uses his screen at a 60° angle.

>>59327656
Because they are on the same tier as audiophiles. Also, how often are you watching static images on your TV?

>>59328465
t. no friends who crowd around your laptop to watch shit.
t. no colleagues who crowd around your laptop to review your work.
t. no collaborators who who crowd around your laptop to observe your genius.

Must suck being so foreveralone anon.

>>59328506
Remind me again why we need more than 30° for any of those.

>>59327536
>he underestimates the stupid of man
thas stoopid.

>>59328506
>static images
What?

>>59328542
see
>>59327504
> Inconsistent pixel wear rates lead to artifacts on static images like desktops.

OLED is fine for TV's where the image is always moving, you never notice the pixel inconsistencies.

>>59328599
How often are you watching static images on your computer?

>>59328661
>what is the taskbar
>what is my constantly-open screenfetch in case of a thread on /g/

>>59327480
Monitor market is always lagging TVs these days, probably because profit margin is lower.

Dell showed a 30" OLED, but it was set to cost $5k and they ended up axing it for whatever reasons.

>>59327480
OLED only have maximum of lifespan of 5 years

>>59327480
>How come we have OLED TVs but no OLED monitors?
You do realize you can use a TV as a monitor? I have a 40" 4K as one.

With that said why the fuck cant I buy non-smart TVs, or similarly sized monitors. I dont want the CIA to be able to spy on me through the microphone in my remote.

>>59329310
Why do you say that like it matters?

>>59327480
Hang on thats not an OLED monitor its a midget tranny wtf??

File: tmp_11942-4091079047199.png (604KB, 600x753px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 600x753px

>>59327480

>Raul said" "I have never pretended to be a television"