I'm going from a 2500K to an 1800X, but apparently MSVC relies more on single thread performance?
Help me /g/, am I being deceived or how badly did I fuck up
>>59309092
get the 1700x, better value and the higher clock speeds help it compared to the 1700 vs the 7700k, and competes nicely with the 6800/6850k
price to performance, but wait maybe another week let windows and amd push out some fixes
>>59309134
Wait, is the 1700X better for what I want than the 1800X?
Not too worried about value, just figured I could avoid dropping 1k on a CPU and get basically the same performance
>>59309154
1800x is good, but honestly, i think 1700x is the real star. $100 less, can compete with the 6900k in way. It just hits that sweet spot imo
>>59309196
Thanks Anon
I'm planning to overclock it so I think the 1800X would be better for that anyway, but I'll look into it some more and see if the 1700X is a better choice
Any idea about MSVC? I was 100% sure it was properly multithreaded but then people keep saying it's not
Go away boatfucker
piss off boatfucker
>weebshit
>>59310055
>>59310031
>>59310069
that's not a boat that's my mom