> 'Improvise' is a toolset for configuration, post-processing, payload setup and execution vector selection for survey/exfiltration tools supporting all major operating systems like Windows (Bartender), MacOS (JukeBox) and Linux (DanceFloor). Its configuration utilities like Margarita allows the NOC (Network Operation Center) to customize tools based on requirements from 'Fine Dining' questionairies.
From Vault7 (CIA-leak).
Linux isn't even safe anymore. What is it still good for now?
>>59306824
> HIVE is a multi-platform CIA malware suite and its associated control software. The project provides customizable implants for Windows, Solaris, MikroTik (used in internet routers) and Linux platforms and a Listening Post (LP)/Command and Control (C2) infrastructure to communicate with these implants.
What I am more interested in is how they come up with these weird names.
>>59306875
>names
most important step when creating 1337 h4x
>implying it was ever safe
It's still good for what it's always been good for, showing everyone how much of an autistic retard you are.
>>59306875
Probably insider (ha!) jokes
What is very worrying is script kiddies and malicious hackers getting their hands on these tools. :(
>>59307004
They didn't release the source codes. Only general information
>>59307041
I know, but if the CIA can find these vulnerabilities, then so can other hackers.
>>59307004
>>59307053
>scriptkiddies
>find exploits
pick one
>>59307053
>no port opened
If they didn't infected me from a website, it's literally nothing. Some "hack" literally needs local access. You talk about CIA, so they can be lazy about remote exploits.
>>59307053
> Implying that they are competent enough.
We are talking about Zero Days here. Everybody else had the opportunity to discover them since the release of these programms. CIA has MIT professors and experts, not just script monkies
>>59307129
> if they didn't infect me from a website
If there is XKeyscore then there will be a backdoor cookie or application
>>59307160
Good luck with that.
>>59306824
>Linux isn't even safe anymore.
>wikileaks recommend it
>Snowden uses it
Security isn't a product that you just get and it will be there for you.
>>59306824
I thought it was pretty obvious that Linux was compromised, but its still better then binbows
>>59306875
4chan posters are their employees
>>59306824
Because the beauty of the open-source and modular nature that Linux adopts allows it to learn, fix and evolve any security loopholes.
>>59306824
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.