Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: NVIDIA_com_MSFT_HGX-1_WMFG-A-CS-HGXfront.jpg (258KB, 980x540px) Image search:
[Google]
258KB, 980x540px
http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-and-microsoft-boost-ai-cloud-computing-with-launch-of-industry-standard-hyperscale-gpu-accelerator
http://www.nvidia.com/object/gpu-accelerated-microsoft-azure.html
THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA
>>
>Microsoft
>AI
k.
>>
File: screenshot-2017-03-08-14-35-03.png (59KB, 876x688px) Image search:
[Google]
59KB, 876x688px
>>59305596
ayy
>>
>>59305596
I'm thinking of making machine learning my career. How fucked am I for the future?
>>
>>
Is this the thread where we pretend GPGPU is used in more than 9% of industry applications?
>>
>>59305596
>Nvidia Tesla quarterly revenue
>150 million
>Intel datacenter quarterly revenue (CPU only)
>4.7 billion
So tell me, if GPUs can replace CPUs, and GPUs are around >>59305890 200 times faster than CPU, then why is Nvidia's Tesla revenue over 20 times smaller than Intel's x86 datacenter revenue, the market they're competing against?
Let me tell you, it's because GPUs are useful to only a handfew of cherrypicked applications.
>>
>>59306039
We know, thanks x86
>>
>>59306039
Just WaitTM
>>
Uff I better call in Facebook and Google and tell them to get rid of their xeons for their ZFS dataservers and backsups because GPUs can RAID, scrub and checsum all dat much faster.
>>
Buthurt Intelfags ITT
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3