> he unironically believes windows users give a shit about

>>59285097
blogspot.com

wordpress.com

sage.com

>>59285097
But the madVR dev freaked out at mpv because he claimed that mpv stole his algorithms.
How can madVR be better if the dev thinks they're identical?

>>59285133
But isn't madVR closed source? How could they have stolen his work if he hides the source code?

>>59285097
You do realize that none of those placebo filters actually make a difference right? You're just mining bitcoins for the people who developed it. Good goy.

>>59285133
>the dev thinks they're identical
Do you live in a fantasy world? madVR has about 10 more algorithms for rendering video. Go ask him right now at doom9 if he thinks they identical and bring us his answer.

>>59285249
>placebo filters
You are literally blind. At the first least you can appreciate the GPU fluid motion filter for AMD GPUs. It's crisp, nothing like that slow crap called SVP, and with literally 0% CPU impact.

>>59285331
>AMD GPUs
sorry I'm not poor. do only poor people use mpc-hc?

anyways enjoy mining buttcoins for placebo, LOSER

File: madVR.png (152KB, 1713x810px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1713x810px

>>59285196
They didnt steal his code. A few months back some anon was able to take a look though. Turns out Madshis code isnt as good as people thought.

>>59285359
sorry I'm not stupid. do only stupid people respond here
the entire point of the thread is not mpc-hc

>>59285377
what a joke
and people respect this retard
this is why that garbage is closed source

>>59285377
> I have literally never seen or I'm able to see madVR's code
> let's call it bad code
please

>>59285391
if I'm stupid, you must be really stupid if you're more poor than a stupid person
buddy, mpc-hc is the mcdonalds of media players

>>59285377
>>59285399
And here we see why linux is a failure on the desktop. 2 idiots on 4chan circlejerk that madVR, the software that mpv copycats is so much worse.

They are not even able to see the code since it's closed source.

Jesus fucking christ, you deserve mpv after all. Go to it.

Nice to see that all the MPV shills are capable of doing is screaming BOTNET, B-BOTNETTTTTTT when challenged, maybe you shouldn't take debate tactics from the vape/doge threads in their final weeks of existence

>>59285446
>>59285450

wow, so much butthurt
truth hurts doesn't it

>>59285466
Do you have any evidence other than NO U's in the face of opposition

>>59285407
>>59285446
>Dump of madVR (0.90.24) shaders
https://0x0.st/eqp.txz

>>59285483
Evidence? For what, to debunk the angry "hurrdurr ur stupid" outbursts from idiot children?

>>59285494
Show us where on your peanus that MadVR touched it

>>59285507
>show us
>us
:^)

>>59285507
how seething are you rn?

Every single thing in existence is some grand political struggle now, like MPC vs. MPV.

Millennials were a mistake.

>>59285309
Actually it's around 4.

>>59285446
>They are not even able to see the code since it's closed source.
They are, though.
You do realize you can de-compile stuff, right?

>>59285529
i'm just here to laugh at mpctards getting butthurt

>>59285548
This. Everyone here is trolling except that one guy who fucking ragequit by now.

File: 1485733037063.gif (3MB, 414x382px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 414x382px

>>59285377
>Anon shows up and just starts making shit up
>/g/ takes it a face value because if they can't understand it, "it must be true"

File: 1452099888323.jpg (23KB, 488x488px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 488x488px

>>59285489
this is hideous

>>59285591
lol no, he's back for more
madshi you legend

>>59285548
>implying wanting to see them butthurt isn't part of the grand political struggle that you are acting out subconsciously

File: fakenews.jpg (74KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1280x720px

>>59285591
>Anon shows up and is like

>>59285686
this post reeks of newfag

>>59285097
so madVR is the better filter?

>>59285377
not sure what that screenshot of yours should prove. it just says that madvr contains a lot of copy pasted code. so? iirc, madshi himself (or somebody posing as him) later joined that 4chan discussion and explained that he did that to improve startup times, or something like that. you may or may not like that approach, but that doesn't say anything at all about the code quality.

if you think you can judge code quality by looking at cross compiled disassembly, you don't seem to know very much about coding.

>>59285377
Kekked, do people actually use this crap?

File: madvr.png (44KB, 694x732px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 694x732px

>>59285800
>that damage control
Literally CS graduate-tier.

>>59285936
>CS
*SE

>>59285489
>1566 files
>maybe 125 discrete algorithms
>only properly like 85-90 because lots of X/Y duplication or dedicated algos for colorspace and bit-size
this is disgusting

>>59285800
having a reason for doing something doesn't mean that reason is good

>>59285377
You can't judge people's code quality through a decompiler. What if he autogenerated the shaders from a template at compile time?

I want mpv to succeed but i dont want mpc to fail. Why cant we just let them be? Is it not enough?

>>59286206
mpc is windows only so who gives a shit?

>>59286148
The hard-coded explanation is a better fit to observation than that though, given >>59285377's observation that there's basically no flexibility in allowed options.

>>59286073
do you have personal experience with dx9 programming? if not, you're probably not the right person to judge if any given reason is good or not.

>>59286613
Well, until such an expert comes along, I'll use what knowledge I have to make my own choices.

Since there's no mpv thread going rn I might as well ask here. How can I make mpv show the same colors as mpc-be? All videos seem to have some yellow-ish tint in mpv compared to mpcbe.
Can't take any screenshots now since I'm on the phone, but for example in some scenes in Monogatari the skin of the characters is close to white in mpcbe (proper color) but in mpv the skin is somewhat yellow-ish or has a warmer tone.
Default config or profile=opengl-hq doesn't matter. Windows.

>>59287144
Install GNU/Linux

>>59287207
what a great advice, thank you.
I'll do just that when all my 500+ Steam games will work natively on Linux.

>>59286426
>mpc is windows only so who gives a shit?
Linux users judging by how much time they spend talking about it.

>>59285097
Which one is supposed to be better?

>>59285800
>>59285936
>>59286073
>>59286613
>>59286646
That's his (if it's actually him) original statement: https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/thread/S57186738#p57215184

Now I don't think the source code actually has over 1000 files which he is editing manually, so the generation at compile time sounds plausible to me. But I'm not expert, though no one here seems to be.

>>59287533
I guess that makes sense. I can accept "generated at compile-time" as an answer if it's from him.

>>59287533
thanks!

yes, he seems to say he's creating (some of) the 1000 compiled shaders automated at compile time. i wonder how fast/slow the dx9 compiler is compared to the glsl compiler? if he says he compiles the shaders at compile time to speedup startup time, that might hint to the dx9 compiler being rather slow. anybody knows?

just done a quick google search. the dx9 hlsl compiler seems terribly slow. e.g. see here:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39622444/hlsl-compilation-speed
https://www.gamedev.net/topic/660996-loop-compilation-bad-performance/

it seems, depending on the situation, sometimes compiling an hlsl shader (even a relatively simple one) can take multiple seconds.

no wonder then that madshi decided to ship fully compiled shaders instead of compiling them at runtime!

I can't believe how passionately you all argue about video players. If only you had such zeal for the things that are truly important in life.

>>59285377
>that image
>i have no idea how compiler optimization works
Really makes the people who didn't go to established CS universities stand out

>>59285097
>madvr is less complete than current vo_opengl
>madvr is still using 1990s technology to sell it to winxp users
>madvr v1.0 will be a paid release
>the next libultra/libplacebo library will destroy any other renderer
>bluesky is very bad and probably doesn't work with new amd cards

>>59285133
In reality he doesn't really give a shit about FOSS drama.

>>59285377
Who do you want writing the renderer - a dude that writes code that spergs on /g/ will find pretty, or dude with modest coding quality but also patience and eye for the actual images the code works on?

I take the second type over "hurr I have read a blogpost about code style guidelines after installing Linux, now I see every programmer is shit" types.

>>59293519
Nice bait. I give it 9/10.